View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Bkash
Joined: 25 Sep 2015
|
Post subject: Tummy tap | |
|
Tummy bloody tap
Is afl as a code becoming like soccer ? Where players takes a dive ? Where has the hard yakka gone ... Are the players too soft... Too chicken or too y gen and beard and latte sipping pu$$is . I hate for thus code to head into the soccer scene cus that the very reason I don't want soccer much anymore (diving and Oscar winning acting that gets done) .
Rant over _________________ 2 b or not 2 b |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
So, are you saying players should be allowed to punch other players in the breadbasket and wind them without penalty? I don't agree (unless they're Carlton players being struck, in which case it's all fine, play-on and a report for staging). |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Parasite taggers should have their ribs cracked.
Zacharacas was equally unlucky last week, belting that Weasel player... _________________ M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
Bucks2014
Joined: 15 Feb 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
The AFL had to do something about it, use to be jumper punchers but they started to get reported. So players were being punched in the solar plexus every week and nothing but maybe a $1000 fine was handed down.
Not sure if you've been whacked in the guts Bkash, but I remember it well in my footy days and it bloody hurt not being able to breathe for awhile. _________________ "Still waiting for your call Caroline ... not a quote in sight. Don't ever presume to speak on Collingwood's behalf," |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Problem is, the AFL just can't start changing interpretation late in 2016.
Was there any announcement that they were cracking down on J-Ping?
The AFL are just asking to be taken to court over this; imagine if a player got a week for jumper-punching his parasite tagger a week out from the finals, when all the players got $1000 fines prior to round 15?
That club would rightfully be screaming "precedent".
Certainly clamp down on jumper-punching for 2017, but 2016 must be consistent with the penalties from earlier in the season.
And yes, most of us had been sniped and almost concussed on the field back in the day, even playing in the VAFA. _________________ M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
Bucks2014
Joined: 15 Feb 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
Agree, I hate changing of the rules but in this case I agree with it. The reason I do players realised they could hit as hard as physically possible and get maybe a fine. Touch someones head and see you later, seems crazy to me. So hate a player or the best player, punch him in the guts all day. Sorry, until the last two weeks you could. _________________ "Still waiting for your call Caroline ... not a quote in sight. Don't ever presume to speak on Collingwood's behalf," |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Location: Bendigo
|
Post subject: | |
|
piedys wrote: | Problem is, the AFL just can't start changing interpretation late in 2016.
Was there any announcement that they were cracking down on J-Ping?
The AFL are just asking to be taken to court over this; imagine if a player got a week for jumper-punching his parasite tagger a week out from the finals, when all the players got $1000 fines prior to round 15?
That club would rightfully be screaming "precedent".
Certainly clamp down on jumper-punching for 2017, but 2016 must be consistent with the penalties from earlier in the season.
And yes, most of us had been sniped and almost concussed on the field back in the day, even playing in the VAFA. |
Surely the change in interpretation has been that these types of punches have become tolerated. Don't the rules prohibit striking? |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
jackcass wrote: | piedys wrote: | Problem is, the AFL just can't start changing interpretation late in 2016.
Was there any announcement that they were cracking down on J-Ping?
The AFL are just asking to be taken to court over this; imagine if a player got a week for jumper-punching his parasite tagger a week out from the finals, when all the players got $1000 fines prior to round 15?
That club would rightfully be screaming "precedent".
Certainly clamp down on jumper-punching for 2017, but 2016 must be consistent with the penalties from earlier in the season. |
Surely the change in interpretation has been that these types of punches have become tolerated. Don't the rules prohibit striking? |
I'm sure the rules prohibit striking, and rightly so.
My beef is that unless all clubs were notified by the AFL that they were cracking down on jumper-punching [news to me if they were...],
then Zacha and Cas could consider themselves very harshly done by, when compared to similar incidents earlier in 2016 only resulting in fines.
All we ever ask the AFL for is consistency in the rules, their interpretations and penalties; and surprise, surprise, they FAIL AGAIN.
Mid season penalty changes to jumper-punching is literally "moving the goalposts" in my opinion.
And for what it's worth, my stance on jumper-punching remains the same: if you are holding an opponents jumper or arm to restrict them from getting to the contest because you are in effect a talentless shit,
then you deserve a whack in the guts everytime.
That doesn't register under my definition of striking... _________________ M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies4shaw wrote: | So, are you saying players should be allowed to punch other players in the breadbasket and wind them without penalty? I don't agree (unless they're Carlton players being struck, in which case it's all fine, play-on and a report for staging). |
If it's a Carlton player being struck, the striker should be allowed, nay obliged, to use brass knuckles. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
yin-YANG
Joined: 03 Oct 2011
|
Post subject: | |
|
I like the physical contests - hard tackling and bumps etc great part of the game. A little push and shove now and then is all good to let you sense that the players are keen to win and will stand their ground. All good.
The punch to the guts however - more often than not a coward punch when the opponent is not aware it is even coming is BS. It is weak and the game would be better without it! _________________ Love us or Hate us... we are Collingwood - you can't ignore the Mighty Magpies!!! |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Location: Bendigo
|
Post subject: | |
|
piedys wrote: | jackcass wrote: | piedys wrote: | Problem is, the AFL just can't start changing interpretation late in 2016.
Was there any announcement that they were cracking down on J-Ping?
The AFL are just asking to be taken to court over this; imagine if a player got a week for jumper-punching his parasite tagger a week out from the finals, when all the players got $1000 fines prior to round 15?
That club would rightfully be screaming "precedent".
Certainly clamp down on jumper-punching for 2017, but 2016 must be consistent with the penalties from earlier in the season. |
Surely the change in interpretation has been that these types of punches have become tolerated. Don't the rules prohibit striking? |
I'm sure the rules prohibit striking, and rightly so.
My beef is that unless all clubs were notified by the AFL that they were cracking down on jumper-punching [news to me if they were...],
then Zacha and Cas could consider themselves very harshly done by, when compared to similar incidents earlier in 2016 only resulting in fines.
All we ever ask the AFL for is consistency in the rules, their interpretations and penalties; and surprise, surprise, they FAIL AGAIN.
Mid season penalty changes to jumper-punching is literally "moving the goalposts" in my opinion.
And for what it's worth, my stance on jumper-punching remains the same: if you are holding an opponents jumper or arm to restrict them from getting to the contest because you are in effect a talentless shit,
then you deserve a whack in the guts everytime.
That doesn't register under my definition of striking... |
Fully concur, hate the adhoc weekly rule interpretation changes. |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
BTW, sniper Hodge will surely go for a sling tackle AND jumper punch.
Let's see the AFL revert to a $1,000.00 fine this week, my guess... _________________ M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
Bkash
Joined: 25 Sep 2015
|
Post subject: | |
|
Tummy tap and jumper punching is considered ilegal ! Ok go that
Then why are players committing deliberate Corkies and knees to the back and ribs not considered illegal ? I guess we always expect and accept certain degree of hardness from the players. _________________ 2 b or not 2 b |
|
|
|
|
Bob Sugar
Joined: 11 Feb 2010 Location: Benalla
|
Post subject: | |
|
I love it how the commentators brush aside tummy taps as if it's nothing, but let me tell you even the soft ones can deck you if they hit the sweet spot and you're not expecting it. _________________ Defender...........
On the day before the first, Daicos created God.
You like this. |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
piedys wrote: | BTW, sniper Hodge will surely go for a sling tackle AND jumper punch.
Let's see the AFL revert to a $1,000.00 fine this week, my guess... |
Oh, lo-and-f*cking behold, the Sniper King Hodge gets away with two counts of murder again.
Unf*cking believable. _________________ M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
|