| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Please rate Nathan's performance 0-5 stars |
| ***** 5 stars |
|
7% |
[ 2 ] |
| **** 4 out of 5 |
|
7% |
[ 2 ] |
| *** 3 out of 5 |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| ** 2 out of 5 |
|
21% |
[ 6 ] |
| * 1 out of 5 |
|
25% |
[ 7 ] |
| Donut - 0 out of 5 |
|
35% |
[ 10 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 28 |
|
| Author |
Message |
CarringbushCigar 
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Location: wherever I lay my beanie
|
| Post subject: Nathan Buckley 2016 Report Card - Round 6 v West Coast |  |
|
| Yes its that time of the week again. |
|
|
|
 |
thompsoc
Joined: 21 Sep 2009
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Send in Homer Simpson for the donuts!!!
_________________
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest. |
|
|
|
|
Brenny
Joined: 05 Apr 2011
Location: Westpac Centre
|
| Post subject: | |
|
My only question is, how do we know today was all bucks fault?
I don't even begin to try and understand game plans, but we showed in the 2nd and 3rd we knew what was going on and regardless of Bucks' coaching efforts, the team performed.
Surely it all can't be Bucks fault... surely.
FYI: I've been critical of Bucks in the past few weeks, but now I've got other questions like maybe our playing list is overrated and maybe they don't have the nouse to be able to play as they should be.
_________________
Heeeeeeeeeeeeeey, we want some Bayley! |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| 5 votes 5 donuts lolz |
|
|
|
|
qldmagpie67
Joined: 18 Dec 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| I voted 5 votes because I like to be different |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| qldmagpie67 wrote: | | I voted 5 votes because I like to be different |
Lol can you stop being a jekyll and hyde!!!  |
|
|
|
|
qldmagpie67
Joined: 18 Dec 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| The Boy Who Cried Wolf wrote: | | qldmagpie67 wrote: | | I voted 5 votes because I like to be different |
Lol can you stop being a jekyll and hyde!!! |
Said the boy who cried wolf !! |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003
Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| thompsoc wrote: | | Send in Homer Simpson for the donuts!!! |
Homer could get a game in our midfield, and couldn't make them any more inept than they are.
_________________
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
CarringbushCigar
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Location: wherever I lay my beanie
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| piedys wrote: | | thompsoc wrote: | | Send in Homer Simpson for the donuts!!! |
Homer could get a game in our midfield, and couldn't make them any more inept than they are. |
I think only Ned Flanders would fit the 'culture' |
|
|
|
|
September Zeros
Joined: 04 Oct 2012
Location: Behind you
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Ooooh it's a love fest in here.....where's the back door? Oh oh ocupado!
Relax its a joke.....and relaxing makes it easier I hear. 
_________________
No Pressure, No Diamonds
They used to be a happy team at hawthorn.
________________ |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I honestly think we have too many ordinary players such as:
Frost
Brown
Langdon
Sinclair
Greenwood
Broomhead
I could probably add Smith to that list, even though he got a lot of the ball, because he just seems a bit ordinary.
Of course even the really good teams have 2-3 players of this calibre, but we've got at least 6, which is 3-4 too many. We really miss Varcoe, Adams, Swan, Ramsay and Elliott. This is not Bucks' fault. |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Should it be Bucks' fault? |
|
|
|
|
Mugwump
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Location: Between London and Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| RudeBoy wrote: | I honestly think we have too many ordinary players such as:
Frost
Brown
Langdon
Sinclair
Greenwood
Broomhead
I could probably add Smith to that list, even though he got a lot of the ball, because he just seems a bit ordinary.
Of course even the really good teams have 2-3 players of this calibre, but we've got at least 6, which is 3-4 too many. We really miss Varcoe, Adams, Swan, Ramsay and Elliott. This is not Bucks' fault. |
I could agree with that list except Sinclair. His leg-speed is valuable in a side that lacks it, his desire unquestionable, and his disposal generally good. He gets a lot of flak for missing easy shots in the early part of his career but nowadays he rarely wastes it. We need his hammies to hold up.
I agree with your general point, though.
_________________
Two more flags before I die! |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Mugwump wrote: | | RudeBoy wrote: | I honestly think we have too many ordinary players such as:
Frost
Brown
Langdon
Sinclair
Greenwood
Broomhead
I could probably add Smith to that list, even though he got a lot of the ball, because he just seems a bit ordinary.
Of course even the really good teams have 2-3 players of this calibre, but we've got at least 6, which is 3-4 too many. We really miss Varcoe, Adams, Swan, Ramsay and Elliott. This is not Bucks' fault. |
I could agree with that list except Sinclair. His leg-speed is valuable in a side that lacks it, his desire unquestionable, and his disposal generally good. He gets a lot of flak for missing easy shots in the early part of his career but nowadays he rarely wastes it. We need his hammies to hold up.
I agree with your general point, though. |
I actually like Sinkers and always have, from the time he debuted. However, he has been injury prone and and has rarely put successive good games together. While his run is definitely valuable, based solely on his performances to date, he has to be considered an average performer. I certainly hope he becomes a good player. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
