|
|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
Tanuki wrote: | Jezza wrote: |
our continual insistence to implement a zone defence that doesn't work and we cannot execute properly is very frustrating to watch.
|
This |
There's no alternative. You have to play zone defense, everyone does players are no longer in fixed positions so man on man is really not possible. We need to get better at it and you don't do that by not playing it. _________________ Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
The_Staunton
Joined: 30 Jul 2007 Location: Hobart
|
Post subject: | |
|
Collingwood Crackerjack wrote: | Pies4shaw wrote: | I thought that was excellent, except for the 6 unanswered goals at the start and the 9 unanswered goals later in the game. |
Take those out and we win by 4 goals easing up....if these trends continue..... |
Except for the four losses, we're 2-0! _________________ We just got nutted at the clearances... |
|
|
|
|
PyreneesPie
PyreneesPie
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
[quote="AN_Inkling"
Unfortunately we dropped away again late and the margin doesn't reflect the amount of good work we put in for half the game. That's one of the challenges under Bucks, when we get down we give up goals very quickly and that needs to change.[/quote]
Not intending to over simply things, but I agree. If we can get some strategies going to stop the run-ons that other teams can get against us, we'll be highly competitive.
It wasn't all negative today. |
|
|
|
|
Collingwood Crackerjack
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Location: Canberra
|
Post subject: | |
|
yin-YANG wrote: | mudlark wrote: | Shameful display. The Comedy slipping act was funny to watch though and turned the tide of what could have been a comeback.Gotta laugh.Frost is the biggest spud ever to don a Collingwood guernsey and Nathan Brown must have pictures of someone because he hasn't a clue about full backing or football for that matter. And ain't it grand we've found ANOTHER turnover king in Smith??? 29 touches and just about turned them all over,not to mention his part in the comedy threesome.Levi Greenwood is woeful. indescribably bad. We're cooked and we need to get a full back quick smart. I'd like to know the free kick tally. I know we got shafted there as well. |
I think Keefe will be back next year so Brown will be under some pressure - but right now there are limited options…
Overall I think Brown, Frost and Reid are good enough - our problems are more to do with a lack of mid pressure and lack of support for our backs more than individual players weaknesses. |
A half gram of coke short of having a decent fullback; a sobering thought _________________ "The last thing he expected WAS THE FIRST THING HE GOT!!!!!"
© Collingwood Crackerjack, 1992 |
|
|
|
|
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
Post subject: | |
|
The_Staunton wrote: | That's where we are at, we accept the Josh Smiths of this world, nice kid, has a dip, but guess what? Can't kick! Another one...the cycle continues. And why does everyone we bring in from another club fall into the land of the bland? Greenwood? 2nd in the Kangaroos B&F? Now a plodding tagger. Aish? Another plodder, can't hit a target. And what is the plan? "Draft picks - ? - 2018 Premiership!" - from where? We aren't within 5 years of GWS in development, St Kilda and Melbourne are coming...and we have no picks early next year. This is the group folks, we're stuck with...this.
The losses are just so inevitable, so predictable, you feel like doing something else with your time. There's no one to rally around, no one that stands out. Just a parade of plodders and good blokes.
I seriously don't know where this clubs next finals appearance is coming from, but it's not from this group and this strategy that's for sure. |
Things can turn around quickly in terms of making finals but I don't particular buy into this illusion that we'll be contending for a flag in 2017-2018 all of a sudden. Sometimes we forget how hard they are to win and with GWS' era beginning and sides like the Bulldogs showing far more upside than we are currently it's hard to see how we'll compete with that right now.
The same noises were being made about 2016-2017 two or three years ago and here we are we haven't displayed substantial improvement despite incorporating a younger team with far more upside and potential.
Based on what I see right now we're a long way off winning a flag. _________________ | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
thompsoc
Joined: 21 Sep 2009
|
Post subject: | |
|
The_Staunton wrote: | Monco Matt wrote: | The_Staunton wrote: | Awful team
Boring, bland plodders - Josh Smith, thanks for having a crack, but another in a long, long, long line of Buckley plodders who just can't kick.
Capable of 1/2 an effort, but so far down the pecking order it's shameful
Not even capable of getting angry, just an awful club at the moment |
Me too, i just feel nothing watching this team. Even through the mini comeback I knew it would only provide false hope. So brittle under pressure, 3 guys slip over creating an eagles goal in the last qtr with the game in the balance and we throw in the towel. We allow a 3 goal contest (with the wind advantage) to cascade into a 10 goal flogging. No heart, no soul, no nothing. And it never changes. We start and end games so poorly, never give ourselves a chance. |
That's where we are at, we accept the Josh Smiths of this world, nice kid, has a dip, but guess what? Can't kick! Another one...the cycle continues. And why does everyone we bring in from another club fall into the land of the bland? Greenwood? 2nd in the Kangaroos B&F? Now a plodding tagger. Aish? Another plodder, can't hit a target. And what is the plan? "Draft picks - ? - 2018 Premiership!" - from where? We aren't within 5 years of GWS in development, St Kilda and Melbourne are coming...and we have no picks early next year. This is the group folks, we're stuck with...this.
The losses are just so inevitable, so predictable, you feel like doing something else with your time. There's no one to rally around, no one that stands out. Just a parade of plodders and good blokes.
I seriously don't know where this clubs next finals appearance is coming from, but it's not from this group and this strategy that's for sure. |
I suggest we throw a big party.
Get the nerds and the straights to let down their hair.
They are too uptight ... need to get loose like Chris Gayle.
We will throw in an invite to Heater and Seeds. _________________ we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest. |
|
|
|
|
The_Staunton
Joined: 30 Jul 2007 Location: Hobart
|
Post subject: | |
|
PyreneesPie wrote: | [quote="AN_Inkling"
Unfortunately we dropped away again late and the margin doesn't reflect the amount of good work we put in for half the game. That's one of the challenges under Bucks, when we get down we give up goals very quickly and that needs to change. |
Not intending to over simply things, but I agree. If we can get some strategies going to stop the run-ons that other teams can get against us, we'll be highly competitive.
It wasn't all negative today.[/quote]
And just in the interest of that, we've been waiting since the Hawthorn loss of 2012 to stop run ons, and we're still waiting...which is why we're so negative in the anti Buckley camp (in the interests of debate) _________________ We just got nutted at the clearances... |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
PyreneesPie wrote: | AN_Inkling wrote: |
Unfortunately we dropped away again late and the margin doesn't reflect the amount of good work we put in for half the game. That's one of the challenges under Bucks, when we get down we give up goals very quickly and that needs to change. |
Not intending to over simply things, but I agree. If we can get some strategies going to stop the run-ons that other teams can get against us, we'll be highly competitive.
It wasn't all negative today. |
The result looks a lot worse than it was. The fact is the Eagles are a very destructive team and have belted teams that aren't Sydney or Hawthorn. Especially at home they were always going to be too good for us. We showed we could match it with them when we were going, unfortunately that late run makes it looks as if we weren't competitive. There are definitely positives to take out of the game but also plenty to work on. _________________ Well done boys!
Last edited by AN_Inkling on Sun May 01, 2016 8:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
Collingwood Crackerjack
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Location: Canberra
|
Post subject: | |
|
watt price tully wrote: | makri wrote: | Pies4shaw wrote: | I thought that was excellent, except for the 6 unanswered goals at the start and the 9 unanswered goals later in the game. |
Excellent bar 15 answered goals. There's an contradiction if ever I heard one. |
Try irony. I hear the Kenyans were burning lots of it recently
Then again that's irrelevant which is the correct answer. Groucho Marx once shot an elephant in his pyjamas, what the elephant was doing there he had no idea. |
"I Went and saw my pies play today"
"Take a beating?"
"No thanks, Eagles already gave us one!". _________________ "The last thing he expected WAS THE FIRST THING HE GOT!!!!!"
© Collingwood Crackerjack, 1992 |
|
|
|
|
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
Post subject: | |
|
AN_Inkling wrote: | Tanuki wrote: | Jezza wrote: |
our continual insistence to implement a zone defence that doesn't work and we cannot execute properly is very frustrating to watch.
|
This |
There's no alternative. You have to play zone defense, everyone does players are no longer in fixed positions so man on man is really not possible. We need to get better at it and you don't do that by not playing it. |
I do agree with this theoretically, and my idea of wanting to play man-on-man is most likely a fantasy at best, but our inability to execute it properly is very frustrating.
Is it a coaching problem or a personnel problem? _________________ | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
pietillidie
Joined: 07 Jan 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
makri wrote: | Pies4shaw wrote: | makri wrote: | Pies4shaw wrote: | I thought that was excellent, except for the 6 unanswered goals at the start and the 9 unanswered goals later in the game. |
Excellent bar 15 answered goals. There's an contradiction if ever I heard one. |
It was actually just meant as a joke to cheer people up a bit. Sorry if it didn't work for you. |
Now is not the time for jokes |
Now is exactly the time, Makri! Go watch your favourite standup on YouTube for half an hour and brainwash yourself out it! Not to malign Pies4Shaw's efforts, of course _________________ In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm |
|
|
|
|
thompsoc
Joined: 21 Sep 2009
|
Post subject: | |
|
AN_Inkling wrote: | Tanuki wrote: | Jezza wrote: |
our continual insistence to implement a zone defence that doesn't work and we cannot execute properly is very frustrating to watch.
|
This |
There's no alternative. You have to play zone defense, everyone does players are no longer in fixed positions so man on man is really not possible. We need to get better at it and you don't do that by not playing it. |
No
Most sides play a short zone and man on man towards the back. _________________ we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest. |
|
|
|
|
Collingwood Crackerjack
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Location: Canberra
|
Post subject: | |
|
The_Staunton wrote: | Collingwood Crackerjack wrote: | Pies4shaw wrote: | I thought that was excellent, except for the 6 unanswered goals at the start and the 9 unanswered goals later in the game. |
Take those out and we win by 4 goals easing up....if these trends continue..... |
Except for the four losses, we're 2-0! |
Thats the spirit....here, have a lollipop _________________ "The last thing he expected WAS THE FIRST THING HE GOT!!!!!"
© Collingwood Crackerjack, 1992 |
|
|
|
|
pietillidie
Joined: 07 Jan 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
thompsoc wrote: | AN_Inkling wrote: | Tanuki wrote: | Jezza wrote: |
our continual insistence to implement a zone defence that doesn't work and we cannot execute properly is very frustrating to watch.
|
This |
There's no alternative. You have to play zone defense, everyone does players are no longer in fixed positions so man on man is really not possible. We need to get better at it and you don't do that by not playing it. |
No
Most sides play a short zone and man on man towards the back. |
I don't think he means they *always* stay in a zone and never actually contest regardless of what happens up-field!
"Jones, Smith and Black, this pack of four opponents forming to mark that long ball in from the centre square is in my zone. Get the hell out!" _________________ In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm |
|
|
|
|
The_Staunton
Joined: 30 Jul 2007 Location: Hobart
|
Post subject: | |
|
Jezza wrote: | The_Staunton wrote: | That's where we are at, we accept the Josh Smiths of this world, nice kid, has a dip, but guess what? Can't kick! Another one...the cycle continues. And why does everyone we bring in from another club fall into the land of the bland? Greenwood? 2nd in the Kangaroos B&F? Now a plodding tagger. Aish? Another plodder, can't hit a target. And what is the plan? "Draft picks - ? - 2018 Premiership!" - from where? We aren't within 5 years of GWS in development, St Kilda and Melbourne are coming...and we have no picks early next year. This is the group folks, we're stuck with...this.
The losses are just so inevitable, so predictable, you feel like doing something else with your time. There's no one to rally around, no one that stands out. Just a parade of plodders and good blokes.
I seriously don't know where this clubs next finals appearance is coming from, but it's not from this group and this strategy that's for sure. |
Things can turn around quickly in terms of making finals but I don't particular buy into this illusion that we'll be contending for a flag in 2017-2018 all of a sudden. Sometimes we forget how hard they are to win and with GWS' era beginning and sides like the Bulldogs showing far more upside than we are currently it's hard to see how we'll compete with that right now.
The same noises were being made about 2016-2017 two or three years ago and here we are we haven't displayed substantial improvement despite incorporating a younger team with far more upside and potential.
Based on what I see right now we're a long way off winning a flag. |
That's what the clubs mantra is, "2018 is our year", well, we keep pushing it back and pushing it back...there's no potential flag in this group. We can't kick. It's sometimes that simple. The talent isn't there after all this time, this whole rebuild, we still wheel out the Josh Smiths and the "great stories"...
Beating Carlton is a must, and enjoyable, but it doesn't solve anything. The club is stuck. I'd love to know how this coaching group, with this strategy and this list, is going to ever achieve anything. And I HOPE like hell in 2022 someone digs this post out and calls me an idiot, but today, I feel we are so far off elite, it's not even funny. _________________ We just got nutted at the clearances... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|