Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Lumumba and Shaw

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BJ Aquarius

Harry C - The champion of the Harrys


Joined: 09 Oct 2001
Location: All around the place

PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 10:33 pm
Post subject: Lumumba and ShawReply with quote

Could do with these two off half back.
Just sayin'

_________________
I don't know the key to success, but the key to failure is trying to please everybody.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
thompsoc 



Joined: 21 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 10:49 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

No run and carry from the backline.
Heater and Harry and Seedsman all gone.
It is run, carry and spread and all 3 could do this.
But the party boys can stuff off.

_________________
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Greening gold 



Joined: 04 Jul 2011
Location: Narooma - NSW South Coast

PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 11:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Lumumba and ShawReply with quote

BJ wrote:
Could do with these two off half back.
Just sayin'


Thought the same thing when I watched Heater v Port last week here in Manuka - he was busy organising the backline structure all game, same as Maxy did. Was it 4 or 5 marks Heater took in the 3Q today? Heritier played a good one tonight against Richmond. Other Collingwood rejects that are getting a game every week in winning clubs include Ceglar, Seedsman and Kennedy, and I think we passed on Tim O'Brien at Hawks too. Rhys Shaw kicked on OK as well.
Good to see we changed the culture of the club and ditched so many blokes who couldn't get a game with us and now play in winning teams.

_________________
If you used to barrack for the 'Pies, you never barracked for the 'Pies.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
AN_Inkling 



Joined: 06 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 11:07 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

We could, and in the case of Shaw especially the club always knew that, but while I'm critical of the amount of run we've traded out of the team those two aren't great examples. Lumumba for Varcoe is a wash and Adams for Shaw is a win for us, we needed to bring in more young talent. The way Shaw left was a discredit to himself and of club, player relations but the outcome was a positive one.

The one thing I would say: we could have traded in Varcoe and also kept Lumumba. That's again skewing our age profile higher though and I think the decision to stay young and just replace Lumumba with a like player was the right one. And that's from a big Lumumba fan who'd love to see him still at the club.

_________________
Well done boys!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
thompsoc 



Joined: 21 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 11:14 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

AN_Inkling wrote:
We could, and in the case of Shaw especially the club always knew that, but while I'm critical of the amount of run we've traded out of the team those two aren't great examples. Lumumba for Varcoe is a wash and Adams for Shaw is a win for us, we needed to bring in more young talent. The way Shaw left was a discredit to himself and of club, player relations but the outcome was a positive one.

The one thing I would say: we could have traded in Varcoe and also kept Lumumba. That's again skewing our age profile higher though and I think the decision to stay young and just replace Lumumba with a like player was the right one. And that's from a big Lumumba fan who'd love to see him still at the club.

Varcoe for Harry is a win.
Adams for Heater is a complete loss.
Seriously Heater is an AA and would kill Adams on a football panel rating vote of who is better.

_________________
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
AN_Inkling 



Joined: 06 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 11:17 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^^Heath Shaw's 30. I'd love him at the club but trading in a younger player was a good move for us given the stage of our list build. His onfield behaviour and performance in his final season didn't leave the club much choice, happy for him to be given the boot at the time.
_________________
Well done boys!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Greening gold 



Joined: 04 Jul 2011
Location: Narooma - NSW South Coast

PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 11:25 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

AN_Inkling wrote:
^^Heath Shaw's 30. I'd love him at the club but trading in a younger player was a good move for us given the stage of our list build. His onfield behaviour and performance in his final season didn't leave the club much choice, happy for him to be given the boot at the time.


Given that he doesn't seem to be having any problems at GWS and in fact is employed as a p/t coach and mentor to the young blokes, do you reckon that whatever problems he may have been having at Vic Park were all his fault?

_________________
If you used to barrack for the 'Pies, you never barracked for the 'Pies.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dark Beanie Gemini



Joined: 06 Feb 2004
Location: A galaxy far, far away.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 11:31 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Different environment, away from party mates, out of the spotlight and finally a bit of maturity has helped.
_________________
If you are foolish enough to be contented, don't show it, but just grumble with the rest. - Jerome K Jerome
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 11:35 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I hated Heater going. However, almost everybody here seemed to think it was a great thing and had to be done, at the time.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
kickit2me Taurus



Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Location: Sai Yok Noi

PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2016 11:36 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't forget Wellingham.
_________________
"And that effort by Ezard was pathetic" - Don Scott.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
inxs88 



Joined: 17 Aug 2014


PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 12:11 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Shaw single-handedly sunk our 2013 finals campaign against Port with his selfish, obstinate and petulant ways. Gifted 2 goals just on half time and put himself ahead of every teammate, supporter and coach. For a 28 year old with 9 senior years experience this was unforgivable so any history revisionists out there should just remember the facts!!
_________________
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
The Boy Who Cried Wolf 



Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right

PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 6:31 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I have to disagree, even though Shaw was a total idiot during that game, it doesn't change the fact that Bucks looked like a clown in the coaches box all game, and was totally out coached by Hinkley - this is the game where I personally jumped off board with the Buckley fail train.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
daics aka the ruckman 



Joined: 30 Aug 2010
Location: Scoreboard Hill @ Vic Park

PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 9:40 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I listened to the first quarter last week GWS v Port. Heath Shaw gave away three free kicks in the first quarter which resulted in goals. He also gave away two 50's for mouthing off to the umpire.
It reminded me of why we traded him.

_________________
go pies
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dangles 

Balmey Army


Joined: 14 May 2015


PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 9:52 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd take Adams over Heater at this stage because he's in the right age demographic for our next tilt at a flag.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
leaderless2016 



Joined: 24 Apr 2016


PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2016 10:13 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Adams fits the demographic from a rebuild sense, but I would love to understand where the clubs see's our next leaders coming from.

Overall, still think we made the right decision on this one, don't forget, Heath was beginning to loss the plot in his final year, most supporters were quite happy to trade him out while he still had value.


Last edited by leaderless2016 on Mon Apr 25, 2016 11:07 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group