|
|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
I've never had the donuts there. I had a hotdog for breakfast, usually go the ham and salad roll but this morning was a tad coolish. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
Try the donuts!the real ones, not the Spanish ones, I rarely indulge in donuts, but market ones are hard to resist! _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Location: The 18
|
Post subject: | |
|
Spanish donuts.
I guess they come with extra cream. _________________ He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👌🏿 _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Location: The 18
|
Post subject: | |
|
think positive wrote: | 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👌🏿 |
What the hell are those emoticons? _________________ He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
swoop42 wrote: | think positive wrote: | 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👌🏿 |
What the hell are those emoticons? |
Clapping hands and a black ok!
😱🙈🍻🤠🤡👹👽☠️🤖🙀🙏🏻👅👣💄👸🏽👨❤️👨💏👩❤️💋👩👯♂️🕺🏻💃🏿🐽🦇🦄🌝🌚🌪🍩🍩🍩🤼♀️🤺🏄🏿♀️🚴🏿🚀🎠🌋🌠🌆🌉🌃🕌🛁🔮
Essen💊💊💊
Colling🆘Wood
WPT🚳 _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
Bucks5
Nicky D - Parting the red sea
Joined: 23 Mar 2002
|
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
|
|
|
|
Mugwump
Joined: 28 Jul 2007 Location: Between London and Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
Yes, the tabloid article is unfair on the discussion, and it misrepresents it. However, the philosophers zone discussion is still pretty lamentable. Read it, and look at how deeply saturated it is with Leftist assumptions :
1. The main problem with the family is that it may be unfair, conferring advantages on some and not others (the purpose of life being to find universal equality, apparently)
2. Biological relationships are largely a social and cultural construction.
3. That the family is "a weathered institution ever more in need of a rationale for existing".
Once you start with these types of assumptions, the conclusions (which, naturally, are that there is no normative or ideal family structure, that private schools are bad, and that you should feel occasionally guilty about giving your kid an advantage by reading to it) follow very patly. They are, of course, the standard pot-boiler conclusions of the Left. How convenient for the ABC's core demographic, nodding along on their donkeys.
A different set of philosophical assumptions might, unsurprisingly, lead to a different set of conclusions :
1. Humans do not make this world or themselves ; rather, they are born into it as a product of evolution, which in turn programmes certain instinctual forms of life (e.g. biological attachment) as predisposing to human happiness ;
2. The private family is the keystone of individual liberty, as it is a small piece, and place, of private government where the state is not routinely empowered to intervene
3. Social equality is not the ultimate goal of life. The ultimate goal is maximizing individual welfare in aggregate, and when one person receives love, or excellence or opportunity, another is not diminished by that.
We don't hear much about this alternative set of assumptions on the ABC, however. I wonder why ? _________________ Two more flags before I die! |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
It's a highly radical view being proposed as a philosophical thought exercise by an interviewee, not 'by the ABC'. Once we get that out of the way, I broadly agree with your arguments whilst retaining some sympathy for the concept of changing the fabric of the family model as we currently know it. If family is an essential institution for the functioning of society, as it may well be, then I think we could do worse than ditching the nuclear family for more of an extended family network, whether that be actual relatives or something more communal.
Either way, nothing wrong with pulling apart all we hold sacred and see what makes it tick – on a philosophy program, it should be a regular exercise. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
Mugwump
Joined: 28 Jul 2007 Location: Between London and Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
David wrote: | It's a highly radical view being proposed as a philosophical thought exercise by an interviewee, not 'by the ABC'. Once we get that out of the way, I broadly agree with your arguments whilst retaining some sympathy for the concept of changing the fabric of the family model as we currently know it. If family is an essential institution for the functioning of society, as it may well be, then I think we could do worse than ditching the nuclear family for more of an extended family network, whether that be actual relatives or something more communal.
Either way, nothing wrong with pulling apart all we hold sacred and see what makes it tick – on a philosophy program, it should be a regular exercise. |
I tend to agree with your points, including the nuclear vs extended family thing. I know it was not the AbC's opinion, but in my experience the "thought experiments" on the ABC tend to go in the leftward, never the rightward direction, and they are not represented as an ideological exercise but rather as some kind of disinterested truth. Somehow it is assumed that the perspective of the Right is already the consensus, when it clearly is not (look at the balance of opinion on my various Burkean scribblings on here if you doubt that !).
A real philosopher would weigh the different concepts of the family, consider their purpose and meaning and the contingent facts and assumptions which underpin them, and consider all angles before delimiting a framework for deciding on truth. Instead, this was pretty low quality sociology based on the idea that equality matters above all, with conclusions that follow predictably ideology-saturated assumptions. _________________ Two more flags before I die! |
|
|
|
|
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Location: The 18
|
Post subject: | |
|
A car has hit a pole down my way so we have an old fashioned power outage.
Haven't had one for a long while and boy you soon realise how you just take it for granted your electricity supply will work in this country.
Thankfully the stove is on gas so I can make something for tea but seeing the bloody thing will be the problem.
A torch, a few small candles and the light on my phone will have to see me through. _________________ He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Location: The 18
|
Post subject: | |
|
Power back on at 6:30pm.
Man not sure how I survived those 105 minutes.
LOL. _________________ He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
Humanity is doomed. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
The worst part of that is resetting everything! _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|