View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
|
|
|
|
Wokko
Come and take it.
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
David wrote: | Wilkie! No way. Didn't see that coming. |
Now you know how I felt in 2010 when country conservative independents backed a Socialist from Melbourne. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
They're going to have a majority without him, so he's just trying to curry some favour. No harm in that. |
|
|
|
|
Dave The Man
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies4shaw wrote: | They're going to have a majority without him, so he's just trying to curry some favour. No harm in that. |
Just so he can Kiss there Ass just in case they need them.
Nothing Wrong with the Old Brown Paper Bag Trick Works _________________ I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
Wokko wrote: | Wilkie and McGowan both backing Turnbull. It's over. |
It's over, and it's just beginning.
LNP stay in power with a majority in the house of reps but they face a dogs breakfast of a senate and I'm not tipping Labor will be kindly disposed toward helping.
Gonna be an interesting time until the next election which I highly doubt will be in 3 years time. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
Post subject: | |
|
ABC predicting that the Coalition will reach 76 seats by winning the seats of Flynn and Capricornia. Labor is predicted to win Cowan, Herbert and Hindmarsh narrowly putting them up to 69 seats.
Therefore the House of Reps will most likely consist of:
Coalition 76
Labor 69
Greens 1
Xenophon 1
Katter 1
Independents 2
- Andrew Wilkie
- Cathy McGowan _________________ | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
Sounds about right, Jezza. Although they'll no longer need the assurances from Katter and McGowan if that comes to pass, they might yet come in handy if they face a by-election or a defection from the ranks. Hardly the most comfortable territory for Turnbull to be in (and that's provided he becomes the first prime minister since Howard to survive a full term). _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
Turnbull has claimed "victory" and Shorten has conceded, if anybody still cares. |
|
|
|
|
Culprit
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: Port Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies4shaw wrote: | Turnbull has claimed "victory" and Shorten has conceded, if anybody still cares. | He has won but is in a worse position in the Senate than before the election. That worked. lol |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
Jezza wrote: | ABC predicting that the Coalition will reach 76 seats by winning the seats of Flynn and Capricornia. Labor is predicted to win Cowan, Herbert and Hindmarsh narrowly putting them up to 69 seats.
Therefore the House of Reps will most likely consist of:
Coalition 76
Labor 69
Greens 1
Xenophon 1
Katter 1
Independents 2
- Andrew Wilkie
- Cathy McGowan |
Those 3 predicted to go to Labor are still right down to the wire with at least 15% of the vote still to be counted and postal votes playing a large part. The prediction is only because Labor currently leads by a fleas foreskin.
I wouldn't be surprised to see all of the 3 go to LNP. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
Hindmarsh has actually been relatively stable over the last few day – indeed, the count has actually started to swing back Labor's way. Still close, but I'm guessing they'll hold that and Cowan, and still have a bit of a buffer left in Herbert. It's certainly not out of the question they could hold all three.
Flynn and Capricornia look like wins for the Liberals at this stage, but let's not forget that they still need to get through absentee and overseas votes. Postal votes are favouring the Coalition, but absentees sometimes swing the other way. If the ABC still consider them to be in doubt, then I'll back their judgement. So while I think the Coalition will have a majority, I don't think a hung parliament is totally out of the question even at this point. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
Culprit
Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: Port Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
Interesting both Turdbull and Shortman say that the Government has a mandate. A mandate to do what actually? Throw in Shortman said they will help the Government Let's see how long that lasts. The arrogance of the LNP is even greater now and it will be interesting how the polls trend later this year. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
You'd like to think that what the ALP has in mind is that it will support the Government in the Senate on the passage of important Bills that get passed in the Reps, rather than allow Hanson any say in things. |
|
|
|
|
Wokko
Come and take it.
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Pies4shaw wrote: | You'd like to think that what the ALP has in mind is that it will support the Government in the Senate on the passage of important Bills that get passed in the Reps, rather than allow Hanson any say in things. |
If the majors team up to railroad One Nation I'd expect their vote to double next election. Why bother voting for a major party if they're just colluding. Greens would pull the left vote and ON the right. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
You really think there's enough angry, paranoid, stupid people out there to double that vote?
It's much more likely that some significant number of the people who voted that way a week ago will realise that, in the calm light of day, they don't want someone sillier than a stoned tree kangaroo representing them.
The problem with One Nation is that it doesn't stand for anything sensible. It's just "against" things. That's not a swipe at conservative politics, generally, it's an observation about that "party" specifically. Radical incoherence is, in our country at least, not typically a means of maintaining a supporter base. |
|
|
|
|
|