Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Australian Federal Election 2016

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 45, 46, 47  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
What'sinaname Libra



Joined: 29 May 2010
Location: Living rent free

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 9:09 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Have the libs made a decision yet?
_________________
Fighting against the objectification of woman.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2016 10:32 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

According to the press gallery they have until mid-May (day after the budget is handed down) to call a double dissolution. I'm guessing the recent polling will have curbed Malcolm's enthusiasm on that front.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Culprit Cancer



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: Port Melbourne

PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:35 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Dan Andrews and his cohorts are pretty smart hitting Turdbull up for some cash to build the major rail project. Turdbull will lose a State by denying Victoria the money. Especially when he gives the perception he is pro public transport.

The new legislation to alter preferential voting doesn't go far enough. You should be able to put 1 and your preference goes nowhere.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
pietillidie 



Joined: 07 Jan 2005


PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:23 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The next person to mention "cost-benefit analysis", "consulting firm" and "good policy" in the same breath is to be summarily executed.

Any old BS to justify the Selfish Old Fart (SOFt) wreck-the-joint-before-we-die grabfest damaging Australia's future:

The Aged wrote:
Malcolm Turnbull's cut-price National Broadband Network is facing mounting delays and rising costs, according to a damning internal progress report obtained by Fairfax Media.

The report, marked "commercial in confidence" and "for official use only", sets out a litany of problems in delivering the Coalition's supposedly more budget-friendly fibre-to-the-node (FTTN) model.

By the company's own assessment, the giant infrastructure project has fallen two-thirds short of its benchmark construction timetable. Connection costs to each house or business are also blowing out. The model had been marketed to voters as superior to Labor's NBN because it was "Fast. Affordable. Sooner".

http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/nbn-malcolm-turnbulls-faster-cheaper-rollout-falters-20160228-gn5l0s.html

Rolling Eyes Effing good one, yesterday dunces. Eff off back to 1920 and don't let the door hit your sagging, warring, paranoid, wrinkly Old Darwinian arses on the way out.

_________________
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Wokko Pisces

Come and take it.


Joined: 04 Oct 2005


PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 11:30 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

By Selfish Old Farts you mean the Baby Boomers who got their free Uni, easy dole money, free Health Care and generous pensions are now leaving a huge debt behind for Gen X+ while removing all these socialist benefits one by one as they roll through life not needing them anymore?

Just got to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps, give a firm handshake to the boss and we'll be fine right gramps?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
pietillidie 



Joined: 07 Jan 2005


PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 12:22 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

^Not sure if David has commandeered your account! Razz

Follow the incentives, is all. Younger people, unfortunately, grew up as the spawn of the beneficiaries, learning their mindset, but not inheriting their economy. Now, said young people lack the political infrastructure, awareness and wherewithal to correct the grabfest and challenge the lies.

Howard launched the assault, Abbott rode it, and now Turnbull is holding the can and had better update his own software quick smart before he and the country end up permanently trapped in an old rust bucket heading south.

_________________
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Culprit Cancer



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: Port Melbourne

PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 5:26 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

pietillidie wrote:
The next person to mention "cost-benefit analysis", "consulting firm" and "good policy" in the same breath is to be summarily executed.

Any old BS to justify the Selfish Old Fart (SOFt) wreck-the-joint-before-we-die grabfest damaging Australia's future:

The Aged wrote:
Malcolm Turnbull's cut-price National Broadband Network is facing mounting delays and rising costs, according to a damning internal progress report obtained by Fairfax Media.

The report, marked "commercial in confidence" and "for official use only", sets out a litany of problems in delivering the Coalition's supposedly more budget-friendly fibre-to-the-node (FTTN) model.

By the company's own assessment, the giant infrastructure project has fallen two-thirds short of its benchmark construction timetable. Connection costs to each house or business are also blowing out. The model had been marketed to voters as superior to Labor's NBN because it was "Fast. Affordable. Sooner".

http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/nbn-malcolm-turnbulls-faster-cheaper-rollout-falters-20160228-gn5l0s.html

Rolling Eyes Effing good one, yesterday dunces. Eff off back to 1920 and don't let the door hit your sagging, warring, paranoid, wrinkly Old Darwinian arses on the way out.
Back to dial up soon.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Culprit Cancer



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: Port Melbourne

PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 5:34 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

And just when Malcolm thought he had breathing space from Big Ears. Bang!! an essay on why he would have won the election, but it's not sniping. lol
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
partypie 



Joined: 01 Oct 2010


PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 6:51 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmmm ... The damn cabinet is leaking again
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Abbott must be almost completely disconnected from reality if he thinks he would have won this election. This is the guy who made (a then completely, as opposed to only mostly, empty and pointless) Bill Shorten look good. People would have voted in Ivan Milat just to get rid of Abbott.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Wokko Pisces

Come and take it.


Joined: 04 Oct 2005


PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 9:24 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Abbott works firmly from the Howard playbook. The more on the nose you are at an election, the more goodies you throw at the electorate. Shorten is so stinky that most people would've held their nose and voted Abbott.

Labor must be praying for as early election so they can ditch Shorten and start a rebuild.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Lazza 



Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:18 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Wokko wrote:
Abbott works firmly from the Howard playbook. The more on the nose you are at an election, the more goodies you throw at the electorate. Shorten is so stinky that most people would've held their nose and voted Abbott.

Labor must be praying for as early election so they can ditch Shorten and start a rebuild.


Do you honestly think that Abbott would have won an election against Shorten the way his polling was going?? Shocked Shocked

_________________
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Wokko Pisces

Come and take it.


Joined: 04 Oct 2005


PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:34 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Hard to say, I remember Howards polls looking pretty dismal mid term and he'd always turn it around but throwing sweets at the electorate. Not as easy to do in a downturn though I suppose. While people didn't like Abbott, I've never known anyone to say how much they like Shorten (Abbott has a lot of support to go along with a lot of hatred, nobody cares about Bill). I think Tone would've ripped him apart in the debates as well.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:03 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

surely Abbott is just gawn yeah
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Lazza 



Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 11:19 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Wokko wrote:
Hard to say, I remember Howards polls looking pretty dismal mid term and he'd always turn it around but throwing sweets at the electorate. Not as easy to do in a downturn though I suppose. While people didn't like Abbott, I've never known anyone to say how much they like Shorten (Abbott has a lot of support to go along with a lot of hatred, nobody cares about Bill). I think Tone would've ripped him apart in the debates as well.


Yeah you make a good point here Wokko.

Hard to say what would have happened.

_________________
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 45, 46, 47  Next
Page 2 of 47   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group