Oh no

[ronrat]

According to the AFL website ex scum player Andrew Carrazzo has been shadowing Matt Stevic in his bid to become a scumpire.

Right Andrew here are my rules.
When in doubt the benefit of the doubt goes to the side playing Collingwood.
Under no circumstances are infringements to Travis Cloke to be penalised.
Hawthorn are to be given every opportunity to bastardise the rules.
A one handed handball by the swans is a legitimate disposal.
If you have to pay a free to the magpies take it back as far from goal as possible, preferably to a player 2 kicks further back.
The advantage rule only applies to Collingwood opposition.
No matter how bad your decision is any protest, however you define it, is to cause the Pies to be penalised 50 metres. A shrug, perplexing look or shaking of the head us good enough. The reverse applies.
If Collingwood come up with a tactic that works you must design a rule that will outlaw it and push Dobber Campbell to introduce it.
Only start paying free to Collingwood when it is clear that they can't win or can't lose.

[Brown26]

It'd be funny if it wasn't true...

You forgot the part about awarding 3 free kicks to the opposition any time there is neutral momentum or momentum going towards Collingwood. That includes after breaks, long stoppages and when the Pies are clearly going to score a goal...

- Ben

[piedys]

That's pretty much my take on the maggots too.
Nice work blokes.

Dyso