#35,#1 Alex Fasolo
Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests Registered Users: None |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Deja Vu
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
E wrote: | Assuming we get Treloar, I believe we have 19 first picked players in our team (i.e., if they are fit, they should play) and FAZ is one of them.
Backs - Langdon, Scharenberg, Williams, Brown, Reid (5)
Mids - Grundy, Pendles, Swan, Sidey, Treloar, Adams, Greenwood, Varcoe, De Goey, Broomhead (10)
Forwards - Cloke, Moore, Elliot, FAZ!!!! (4)
I would make all 19 of these players untouchable!
There are then about 15 players who also capable of getting games if form and availability of the above makes it possible.
Crisp, Frost, White, Witts, Oxley, Goldsack, Blair, Maynard, Marsh, Ramsey, Sinclair, Ben Kenn, Seedsman, Macaffer, Toovey.
If this list was reduced to 10 players by the start of next season, by trading those that have any currency that we could convert into a first picked player, I don't think that hurts our best team. so far, we have had rumors about Frost, Witts, Seedsman and Kennedy.
Freeman and Goodyear haven't shown me anything yet (and Freeman seems gone), Gault and Abbott are rookies - Cox not considered.
Total of 39 players. |
Good analysis but Crisp belongs in the starting mid group IMO _________________ http://youtu.be/hvtdbfI1sqQ |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Deja Vu wrote: | E wrote: | Assuming we get Treloar, I believe we have 19 first picked players in our team (i.e., if they are fit, they should play) and FAZ is one of them.
Backs - Langdon, Scharenberg, Williams, Brown, Reid (5)
Mids - Grundy, Pendles, Swan, Sidey, Treloar, Adams, Greenwood, Varcoe, De Goey, Broomhead (10)
Forwards - Cloke, Moore, Elliot, FAZ!!!! (4)
I would make all 19 of these players untouchable!
There are then about 15 players who also capable of getting games if form and availability of the above makes it possible.
Crisp, Frost, White, Witts, Oxley, Goldsack, Blair, Maynard, Marsh, Ramsey, Sinclair, Ben Kenn, Seedsman, Macaffer, Toovey.
If this list was reduced to 10 players by the start of next season, by trading those that have any currency that we could convert into a first picked player, I don't think that hurts our best team. so far, we have had rumors about Frost, Witts, Seedsman and Kennedy.
Freeman and Goodyear haven't shown me anything yet (and Freeman seems gone), Gault and Abbott are rookies - Cox not considered.
Total of 39 players. |
Good analysis but Crisp belongs in the starting mid group IMO |
Maynard is a starter too. |
|
|
|
|
MagpiesTheGreat
Joined: 01 Dec 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
Would love to retain Marsh... |
|
|
|
|
3rd degree
Joined: 22 Jun 2004 Location: John Wren's tote
|
Post subject: | |
|
An important player if he can get his confidence up. Needs to get nastier and cockier again, dropped his head for a bit. _________________ " Ohhh Banksy and out comes the Note Book".
www.facebook/the hybernators |
|
|
|
|
Cam
Nick's BB Member #166
Joined: 10 May 2002 Location: Springvale
|
Post subject: | |
|
3rd degree wrote: | An important player if he can get his confidence up. Needs to get nastier and cockier again, dropped his head for a bit. |
Indeed. Needs more Brutus Beefcake and less Ricky Steamboat. _________________ Get back on top. |
|
|
|
|
inxs88
Joined: 17 Aug 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
Cam wrote: | 3rd degree wrote: | An important player if he can get his confidence up. Needs to get nastier and cockier again, dropped his head for a bit. |
Indeed. Needs more Brutus Beefcake and less Ricky Steamboat. |
and more Elizabeth _________________ I love the Pies, hate Carlscum |
|
|
|
|
3rd degree
Joined: 22 Jun 2004 Location: John Wren's tote
|
Post subject: | |
|
Cam wrote: | 3rd degree wrote: | An important player if he can get his confidence up. Needs to get nastier and cockier again, dropped his head for a bit. |
Indeed. Needs more Brutus Beefcake and less Ricky Steamboat. |
Definitely Brutus when he held the tag belts with "The Hammer" _________________ " Ohhh Banksy and out comes the Note Book".
www.facebook/the hybernators |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Location: Bendigo
|
Post subject: | |
|
E wrote: | Assuming we get Treloar, I believe we have 19 first picked players in our team (i.e., if they are fit, they should play) and FAZ is one of them.
Backs - Langdon, Scharenberg, Williams, Brown, Reid (5)
Mids - Grundy, Pendles, Swan, Sidey, Treloar, Adams, Greenwood, Varcoe, De Goey, Broomhead (10)
Forwards - Cloke, Moore, Elliot, FAZ!!!! (4)
I would make all 19 of these players untouchable!
There are then about 15 players who also capable of getting games if form and availability of the above makes it possible.
Crisp, Frost, White, Witts, Oxley, Goldsack, Blair, Maynard, Marsh, Ramsey, Sinclair, Ben Kenn, Seedsman, Macaffer, Toovey.
If this list was reduced to 10 players by the start of next season, by trading those that have any currency that we could convert into a first picked player, I don't think that hurts our best team. so far, we have had rumors about Frost, Witts, Seedsman and Kennedy.
Freeman and Goodyear haven't shown me anything yet (and Freeman seems gone), Gault and Abbott are rookies - Cox not considered.
Total of 39 players. |
Other than a couple of specific posters pushing their own ill informed and completely misguided hate agenda I haven't heard or read anything about Frost in relation to trade options. |
|
|
|
|
watt price tully
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
jackcass wrote: | E wrote: | Assuming we get Treloar, I believe we have 19 first picked players in our team (i.e., if they are fit, they should play) and FAZ is one of them.
Backs - Langdon, Scharenberg, Williams, Brown, Reid (5)
Mids - Grundy, Pendles, Swan, Sidey, Treloar, Adams, Greenwood, Varcoe, De Goey, Broomhead (10)
Forwards - Cloke, Moore, Elliot, FAZ!!!! (4)
I would make all 19 of these players untouchable!
There are then about 15 players who also capable of getting games if form and availability of the above makes it possible.
Crisp, Frost, White, Witts, Oxley, Goldsack, Blair, Maynard, Marsh, Ramsey, Sinclair, Ben Kenn, Seedsman, Macaffer, Toovey.
If this list was reduced to 10 players by the start of next season, by trading those that have any currency that we could convert into a first picked player, I don't think that hurts our best team. so far, we have had rumors about Frost, Witts, Seedsman and Kennedy.
Freeman and Goodyear haven't shown me anything yet (and Freeman seems gone), Gault and Abbott are rookies - Cox not considered.
Total of 39 players. |
Other than a couple of specific posters pushing their own ill informed and completely misguided hate agenda I haven't heard or read anything about Frost in relation to trade options. |
Alright then, I'll see you one: Frost for Talia +/- other tradeables. _________________ “I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
|
roar
Joined: 01 Sep 2004
|
Post subject: | |
|
Need Frost for depth, I reckon as neither Brown nor Reid are the most physically reliable types.
Pretty much agree with E's list of 19 - I'd probably add Crisp, not sure if I would include Fas - these are the players I see being our future. Some of the others (Marsh, Ramsay, Maynard) I expect to be etched into that list by this time next year so they would also be "untouchable" at this stage. _________________ kill for collingwood! |
|
|
|
|
Albert Parker
Joined: 13 Dec 2012
|
Post subject: | |
|
Fasolo was our best forward in the second half of the season.
Problem is, he seems to perform best when Cloke is missing.
Conversion was a problem at times, but he has demonstrated he is better than that over previous seasons. Also improved his forward pressure, although it is yet to be considered a strength.
I think he is a keeper at present _________________ One team, one dream - the Pies and this year's premiership |
|
|
|
|
qldmagpie67
Joined: 18 Dec 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
stui magpie wrote: | qldmagpie67 wrote: |
My concern is can we play both Faz & Elliott in the same forward line ?
They are both the same type lead up mid sized forwards |
Where does this myth come from? They are not the same. yeah, they have some similar traits but they're not the same. |
Stui name me a game when they played together they both had a impact forward ?
My opinion is they both like to be lead up type medium size players. Neither are crumbers neither are overly defensive types and neither have the tank to run in the midfield and both love to be focal targets in th forward 50 that's what I meant.
Faz best games came with Cloke missing, Elliott's came with Cloke in the side but playing up the ground
Elliott is a far more reliable kick but Faz isn't a slouch.
I just don't see them as a perfect fit together in the same forward line but we aren't overly stocked with genuine reliable goal,kickers either.
I've said before I would love a Gunston type around they 190cm hybrid style to compliment our others forwards and a true crumber
I still not into trading him unless it's for huge overs in our favour |
|
|
|
|
Albert Parker
Joined: 13 Dec 2012
|
Post subject: | |
|
qldmagpie67 wrote: | stui magpie wrote: | qldmagpie67 wrote: |
My concern is can we play both Faz & Elliott in the same forward line ?
They are both the same type lead up mid sized forwards |
Where does this myth come from? They are not the same. yeah, they have some similar traits but they're not the same. |
Stui name me a game when they played together they both had a impact forward ?
My opinion is they both like to be lead up type medium size players. Neither are crumbers neither are overly defensive types and neither have the tank to run in the midfield and both love to be focal targets in th forward 50 that's what I meant.
Faz best games came with Cloke missing, Elliott's came with Cloke in the side but playing up the ground
Elliott is a far more reliable kick but Faz isn't a slouch.
I just don't see them as a perfect fit together in the same forward line but we aren't overly stocked with genuine reliable goal,kickers either.
I've said before I would love a Gunston type around they 190cm hybrid style to compliment our others forwards and a true crumber
I still not into trading him unless it's for huge overs in our favour |
So you'd pursue Jeremy Howe? _________________ One team, one dream - the Pies and this year's premiership |
|
|
|
|
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
Post subject: | |
|
jackcass wrote: | E wrote: | Assuming we get Treloar, I believe we have 19 first picked players in our team (i.e., if they are fit, they should play) and FAZ is one of them.
Backs - Langdon, Scharenberg, Williams, Brown, Reid (5)
Mids - Grundy, Pendles, Swan, Sidey, Treloar, Adams, Greenwood, Varcoe, De Goey, Broomhead (10)
Forwards - Cloke, Moore, Elliot, FAZ!!!! (4)
I would make all 19 of these players untouchable!
There are then about 15 players who also capable of getting games if form and availability of the above makes it possible.
Crisp, Frost, White, Witts, Oxley, Goldsack, Blair, Maynard, Marsh, Ramsey, Sinclair, Ben Kenn, Seedsman, Macaffer, Toovey.
If this list was reduced to 10 players by the start of next season, by trading those that have any currency that we could convert into a first picked player, I don't think that hurts our best team. so far, we have had rumors about Frost, Witts, Seedsman and Kennedy.
Freeman and Goodyear haven't shown me anything yet (and Freeman seems gone), Gault and Abbott are rookies - Cox not considered.
Total of 39 players. |
Other than a couple of specific posters pushing their own ill informed and completely misguided hate agenda I haven't heard or read anything about Frost in relation to trade options. |
yes folks, he actually said that..... _________________ Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk ....... |
|
|
|
|
Kurt
Joined: 07 Oct 2013
|
Post subject: | |
|
No _________________ Boom baby! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|