#35,#1 Alex Fasolo
Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bob Sugar
Joined: 11 Feb 2010
Location: Benalla
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
Required player IMO.
_________________
Defender...........
On the day before the first, Daicos created God.
You like this. |
|
|
|
 |
Darkstranger
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
|
| Post subject: | |
|
No doubt trade bait and expendable, been there long enough for not enough
Hopefully some interest.
_________________
There is Collingwood and then the rest. |
|
|
|
|
roar
Joined: 01 Sep 2004
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Normally a better kick at goal than he showed this year, and if that gets back on track, he'll be handy.
_________________
kill for collingwood! |
|
|
|
|
Domesticated_Ape 
Joined: 01 Oct 2012
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| derkd wrote: | | blakis wrote: | | We are not losing the Faz he was one of our better players this year. He just needs his role to be more clearly defined as a crumbing forward. |
Don't get me wrong, I think he has played some solid games this year. Problems is he fits into the "not quite anything" player mold. As a forward he is almost a third tall....but not quite. If he is a small well he battles with Elliot for that spot. He does not get the disposals avg only 14 per game for 2015 for the middle of the ground.
A very good depth player, but i get the feeling he is to talented to play as simply a depth player. Does he play on a wing? try him down back? |
No, this fits into the "not quite anything" post mold.
One small forward spot? Five talls then?
Depth player who played 17 games this year?
Fighting with Elliot for a spot when they played together more than half the season?
Fas has already been tried down back and occasionally gets up onto a wing. His best spot is as a lead up small forward and he wont be traded if the above are the best reasons people can come up with. |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie 
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Love the Fas. He stays unless we get a great offer for him. No one is untradeable, it all depends on what's on offer.
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Flashman
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
He was good this year.
He flies too much with our talls on occasion when he should stay down and his set shot kicking for goal dropped off a little bit, but aside from that he did his job. His second half of the year when Cloke and Elliott were virtually useless was very good in particular. He has very good hands, can read it off the pack when he remembers to crumb and has the potential to be a very good finisher.
I'd look to trade others ahead of him that's for sure. |
|
|
|
|
Culprit 
Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: Port Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| My view is no club has shown interest in him at this stage. If a club does I am sure the club would consider the offer. He has potential but teases us all the time. |
|
|
|
|
Flashman
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I'd trade Cloke ahead of him.
Seriously. |
|
|
|
|
qldmagpie67
Joined: 18 Dec 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Last year I would have taken anything we could get for him. This year he improved greatly.
My concern is can we play both Faz & Elliott in the same forward line ?
They are both the same type lead up mid sized forwards and neither is defensively strong or adept enough to play long patches in the midfield.
I wouldn't be trading him unless we got offered well over the odds (a early first round pick or 2 decent players with 50+ AFL games) |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Is this really the last one? |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| qldmagpie67 wrote: |
My concern is can we play both Faz & Elliott in the same forward line ?
They are both the same type lead up mid sized forwards |
Where does this myth come from? They are not the same. yeah, they have some similar traits but they're not the same.
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Member 7167 
"What Good Fortune For Governments That The People Do Not Think" - Adolf Hitler.
Joined: 18 Dec 2008
Location: The Collibran Hideout
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Bob Sugar wrote: | | Required player IMO. |
Agree Defender - err Bob Sugar.
He has improved in time but needs to understand that when he is in a contest with the likes of Moore, Cloke or White he needs to stay down, not detract from the marking contest and concentrate on crumbing if the oppotunity arises. He will get there in time and will improve his value in our forward line.
_________________
Now Retired - Every Day Is A Saturday |
|
|
|
|
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Assuming we get Treloar, I believe we have 19 first picked players in our team (i.e., if they are fit, they should play) and FAZ is one of them.
Backs - Langdon, Scharenberg, Williams, Brown, Reid (5)
Mids - Grundy, Pendles, Swan, Sidey, Treloar, Adams, Greenwood, Varcoe, De Goey, Broomhead (10)
Forwards - Cloke, Moore, Elliot, FAZ!!!! (4)
I would make all 19 of these players untouchable!
There are then about 15 players who also capable of getting games if form and availability of the above makes it possible.
Crisp, Frost, White, Witts, Oxley, Goldsack, Blair, Maynard, Marsh, Ramsey, Sinclair, Ben Kenn, Seedsman, Macaffer, Toovey.
If this list was reduced to 10 players by the start of next season, by trading those that have any currency that we could convert into a first picked player, I don't think that hurts our best team. so far, we have had rumors about Frost, Witts, Seedsman and Kennedy.
Freeman and Goodyear haven't shown me anything yet (and Freeman seems gone), Gault and Abbott are rookies - Cox not considered.
Total of 39 players.
_________________
Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk .......
Last edited by E on Thu Oct 01, 2015 3:07 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| There exists this list was reduced to 10 players by the start of next season by trading those that. |
|
|
|
|
rand corp
Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: south east asia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Prefer to keep him but he is not one of the untouchables,
In that I mean, he has his price, if losing him was the difference in getting Treloar for example, you'd do it in a heartbeat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
