Saudi Arabia
Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests Registered Users: None |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ronrat
Joined: 22 May 2006 Location: Thailand
|
Post subject: | |
|
Jezza wrote: | Sunni-Shia relations are going to take a massive blow now.
Considering much of the conflicts in the Middle East are centered around this schism I can't see any peace in the region any time soon. |
Hasn't been for centuries. And won't be for a few more. The best thing, well smartest thing, is to stay out of it. The ironic thing is if it gets into a half decent shit fight half the adult population will be doing nothing because they are not allowed. The Saudis have Mecca of course which could make it problematic for the Haj pilgrimages over a few years. _________________ Annoying opposition supporters since 1967. |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
I've wondered about that. What is the experience of Shiites taking that pilgrimage? Must be at least some amount of teeth-gritting. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
|
|
|
|
sixpoints
Joined: 27 Sep 2010 Location: Lulie Street
|
Post subject: | |
|
Why's everyone got a problem with the Saudi's all of a sudden? That's no way to treat an ally!
2010 - the worlds biggest arms sale ever made is signed off between the U.S. and the Saudis. The U.S. agree to sell $60 billion worth. (84 F18 fighter aircraft, 70 Apache helicopters, 36 surveillance helicopters)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8000747/US-secures-record-60-billion-arms-sale-to-Saudi-Arabia.html
The Brits have sold so many British made war planes to the Saudis that now the Saudis have more of them than the Brits have!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/11584269/Saudis-UK-made-war-jets-outnumber-RAFs.html
Let's not forget to top up on British made missiles why are at it. The Brits will divert the missiles they are making up in Scotland to the Saudis first. They will restock the Saudis and keep their own orders on hold. The Saudis need them more at the moment.
http://www.defensenews.com/story/breaking-news/2015/07/16/britain-diverts-bombs-destined--raf--help-saudi-fight--yemen/30236031/
Billions upon billions of arms sales to the home of Wahabbism, the home of Al
Qaeda, the home of 11 out of 15 of the 9/11 bombers, the home of women being second class citizens, the home of mass beheadings....our allies.
Presently the Saudis are using US & Britsh planes and missiles to attack another country in Yemen. The sovereignty of another nation has been breeched and countless killed in air strikes, but not a sniff of protest. Just like in 2010 when Saudi tanks rolled into Bahrain to quell pro-democracy protests.
Invade and bomb other countries at your will and we'll even supply the hardware.
It's freely sold to them and they use it. When they use it and thousands die, of course no protest or condemnation occurs. Now they execute Nimr al Nimr and in doing so send an incendiary and provocative message straight to Iran.
These nut jobs think they have the imprimatur to do what ever they like.
The sad fact is that they indeed do. |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
Moving away from regional conflicts for a moment, here's something for those who actually want to know more about women's rights in Saudi Arabia – not just as a way of reinforcing simplistic narratives but actually to understand a little about how things are there, both in terms of the brutality inflicted upon women there and their struggle for a more liberated future.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/01/11/sisters-in-law
They're starting from a long way back all right, but they're making progress. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
Way way way way too slow that progress! OMG. I'd die if I had to live like that, those poor women, fighting for rights that should have been theirs 50 years ago if not from year dot!
Curios if single men and women risk arrest for being seen together, how the hell do they meet a partner! _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
think positive wrote: | Way way way way too slow that progress! OMG. I'd die if I had to live like that, those poor women, fighting for rights that should have been theirs 50 years ago if not from year dot!
Curios if single men and women risk arrest for being seen together, how the hell do they meet a partner! |
The woman don't get much choice in partner, dad brokers a deal with a mate or a business colleague, the woman marries who she's told to. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
^ Yep, that's how arranged marriages work (or worked until recent times), in Israel, Japan, India and Congo, as well as every country in Europe. This - second-class treatment of women - is the history of the entire human race. Thankfully, even the stragglers are starting to leave it behind now. Cause for celebration, no?
It's not the best analogy, but seeing these cracks in the Saudi patriarchy is like seeing the slowest kid in school pick up his first book. It doesn't mean you no longer have idiots in your class or that he's suddenly a genius, but it does mean that things are changing for the better.
TP, how slow is too slow? By what measurement can we assess these things? _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace
Last edited by David on Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:09 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Your purpose is celebration no. |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
David wrote: | ^ Yep, that's how arranged marriages work (or worked until recent times), in Israel, Japan, India and Congo, as well as every country in Europe. This - second-class treatment of women - is the history of the entire human race. Thankfully, even the stragglers are starting to leave it behind now. Cause for celebration, no?
It's not the best analogy, but seeing these cracks in the Saudi patriarchy is like seeing the slowest kid in school pick up his first book. It doesn't mean the struggle is over, but it does mean the struggle is winning.
TP, how slow is too slow? By what measurement can we assess these things? |
By what measurement do you assess "recency"? _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Will that accomplish your objective? |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
Like, right now? Arranged marriage is extraordinarily common in Orthodox Jewish communities in Israel and traditional Hindu communities in India, and was just about the only form of marriage allowed in Japan before WW2 (and still seem to be practiced there in some places there today).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arranged_marriage
Quote: | Arranged marriages have declined in prosperous countries with social mobility, ascendancy of individualism and the nuclear family; nevertheless, arranged marriages are still seen in countries of Europe and North America, among royal families, aristocrats and minority religious groups such as inplacement marriage among Fundamentalist Mormon groups of the United States. In most other parts of the world, arranged marriages continue to varying degrees and increasingly in quasi-arranged form, along with autonomous marriages. |
All marriage has ever been, in its simplest form, is one man handing his property over to another man. The suitor asks the father for his daughter's hand; the father walks his daughter down the aisle. That dynamic only exists for us symbolically today, but the very fact that those symbols are still so widespread demonstrates how universal the idea was until recent times. _________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
^
I was more thinking of "every country in Europe" being recent when it was largely ceased in the 18th century. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003 Location: Andromeda
|
Post subject: | |
|
Ah, I see - in that case I was definitely referring to the historical practice, although there are probably some small communities throughout Europe (gypsies, for instance) where it is still practised.
Anyhow, I found this entry in the Encyclopedia Britannica amusing. Shows how standards and perceptions can change:
http://www.britannica.com/topic/family-kinship#ref794409
Quote: | The general rule in marriages until modern times was the legal transfer of dependency, that of the bride, from father to groom. Not only did the groom assume guardianship, he usually assumed control over all of his wife’s affairs. Often, the woman lost any legal identity through marriage, as was the case in English common law. There have been exceptions to this practice. Muslim women, for instance, had considerable control over their own personal property. |
_________________ All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
pietillidie
Joined: 07 Jan 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
^The error you highlight here, i.e., the mistake of judging different people in different cultural contexts by our own local perception of time, is behind a good portion of cultural misinterpretation at the moment.
We can actually now experience spatial difference much better than we can a difference of time, including sequence, development trajectory, and such. We can simply visit a place or even see a picture of it to know we're dealing with something vastly different.
Put jeans and sneakers on someone, and bring them into our geographic space, and the difference *apparently* dissolves. Except it hasn't, of course; instead, we just can't see it, even though it remains in the person's head and near social relations, and then that of their kids for a couple of generations.
The same applies to our grandparents, but we have grown up together and accommodate the differences, and can't remember just how insane many of their old views and behaviours were when we were kids. And if we can't remember something, it might as well have never existed. _________________ In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|