Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
How many Syrian refugees should Australia take?

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 64, 65, 66 ... 72, 73, 74  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  

How many Syrian refugees should Australia take?
None
52%
 52%  [ 21 ]
A few hundred
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
A few thousand
5%
 5%  [ 2 ]
Over ten thousand
5%
 5%  [ 2 ]
As many as possible
35%
 35%  [ 14 ]
Total Votes : 40

Author Message
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:51 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, they have – look up "Christian domestic discipline" on YouTube. Alternatively, here's an article on the phenomenon:

http://m.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/christian-domestic-discipline-spanking-jesus-marriage_n_3479646

This is a common thread running through all of the Abrahamic religions. Christianity, of course, always seems a little more modern in these respects because it has mostly been declawed in the West. What's important to realise that there is a substantial movement right now within Islam against views like this, and groups like HbT represent the religion's reactionary rear guard in the West, not the mainstream by any means.

Isn't it a little ironic that those most likely to fling up their hands in horror at this story – "look at this barbaric, irredeemable religion!" – are often the first to advocate that parents and teachers should still be allowed to hit children? The conservative mind is a strange and often contradictory thing.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace


Last edited by David on Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:00 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Mugwump 



Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Location: Between London and Melbourne

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 9:59 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies4shaw wrote:
Of course, Syrian refugees invented wife-beating. Christians never, ever did that.

C'mon, Skids, stop insulting our intelligence.


Wife beating is expressly commanded in the Quran in cases of disobedience (Chapter 4). The people quoted by Skids are thus expressing the command of their scriptures, in accordance with the rather literalist tradition which is mainstream in Islam, and the misogyny which appears accordingly characteristic of observant Muslims.

I cannot think of anything comparable in the Bible (despite the many sillinesses of the latter, esp. the OT, which mainstream Christians have learned not to take literally).

_________________
Two more flags before I die!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:08 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, come on Mugwump – you'll have to try harder than that! Try these verses from the New Testament (not an explicit command for domestic violence, but still...):

Ephesians 5:22-24:

Quote:
Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.


1 Peter 3:5-6:

Quote:
For this is the way the holy women of the past who put their hope in God used to adorn themselves. They submitted themselves to their own husbands, like Sarah, who obeyed Abraham and called him her lord. You are her daughters if you do what is right and do not give way to fear.


What's a bit of gentle discipline between lord and subject?

As for beating children...

Proverbs 13:24

Quote:
He who withholds his rod hates his son, But he who loves him disciplines him diligently.


His rod, mind you, not his gentle slap on the back of a child's hand.

It's a good thing Christians never take these verses literally and actually hit their children with sticks! God forbid that should be the case.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Mugwump 



Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Location: Between London and Melbourne

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:26 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:


Isn't it a little ironic that those most likely to fling up their hands in horror at this story – "look at this barbaric, irredeemable religion!" – are often the first to advocate that parents and teachers should still be allowed to hit children? The conservative mind is a strange and often contradictory thing.


Parents and teachers are accorded legitimate authority over children - within boundaries - because they are capable of judging the child's best interests better than the child, and it can be reasonably assumed that they are acting to secure the child's best interest when they administer discipline. That is simply a different category of thinking to the idea that husbands/men have that kind of authority over their wives/women.

If you find the "conservative mind" odd on this issue, I'd say that may be because you have failed to see how the two situations are categorically different despite a superficial likeness. You will find much contradiction if you cannot judge equivalence correctly. Perhaps that is a problem with the socialist mind.

I dislike corporal punishment of children, and would prefer that it not be used, but I'm prepared to admit that in some cases and with strict conditions, it may be the kindest thing to do when all else fails. I would, however, hate to go back to the early 1970s and before, when teachers were given too much freedom to use it unilaterally.

_________________
Two more flags before I die!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Mugwump 



Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Location: Between London and Melbourne

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:31 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

^ and in the quotes you give above, the bit which commands a husband to beat his wife (cf the very express Chapter 4 of the Quran) is where, exactly ? I certainly do not have the immersion in the Bible that your upbringing gave you, but I seem to recall that a man is instructed to love his wife as he would his own body, and I recall nothing which licenses wife beating, even in the loonier bits.

Re rods and children, see above - and anyway, it's a different topic.

PS no argument that Biblical literalism is for fools, however. There is much beauty in the book and in JC's ethics, but it's not exactly an instruction manual, taken as a whole. And none of the mainstream churches seem to consider it literally obligatory. That is not the case within Islam.


Last edited by Mugwump on Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:39 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:35 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Have you ever had the immersion in the Bible that your upbringing gave you but he or she seem to recall that a man is instructed to love his wife as he would his own body ? What specifically makes you think of that?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 11:52 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
Actually, they have – look up "Christian domestic discipline" on YouTube. Alternatively, here's an article on the phenomenon:

http://m.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/christian-domestic-discipline-spanking-jesus-marriage_n_3479646

This is a common thread running through all of the Abrahamic religions. Christianity, of course, always seems a little more modern in these respects because it has mostly been declawed in the West. What's important to realise that there is a substantial movement right now within Islam against views like this, and groups like HbT represent the religion's reactionary rear guard in the West, not the mainstream by any means.

Isn't it a little ironic that those most likely to fling up their hands in horror at this story – "look at this barbaric, irredeemable religion!" – are often the first to advocate that parents and teachers should still be allowed to hit children? The conservative mind is a strange and often contradictory thing.


Fuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuckfuck

This shits me, sorry!
No I'm not sorry.

I smacked my children. But I never hit them. Even left a bit of a red mark on a bare leg once when the eldest nearly hurt herself on something she had been told no, shown why, explained why, but still tried to do! I make no apologies for it. It worked, she never did it again.

If all those awful little fucjers out there copped the same, tough love, controlled discipline, blah blah blah, instead of treat them like an adult, the naughty chair and all that other crap that first work, they might have boundaries. No teachers should not physically discipline, but the little bastards can do detention, lines, pick up the crap in the play ground in front of the other kids, it won't $£$%^%%$ kill them. Everybody makes mistakes, or chooses the wrong thing to do, and everybody needs to learn about consequences, self control, and respect.

And I don't want to hear about Christians burning women at the stake for cheating, disobedience blah blah blah, I've been to about a dozen weddings lately, in all kind of religions, not one couple said obey. The old shit doesn't matter, that time is gone, but that video is cutprrent. And it's disgusting.

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:12 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

If anyone wants any evidence that morality is relative, this discussion is Exhibit A!

I personally think it's probably worse to hit a little child than an adult (force and consequential harm being equal), but I respect your opinion if you feel differently. I just hope you can appreciate the irony of condemning one as barbaric even while writing the kind of apologism for corporal punishment that many others in our society would find barbaric.

I don't mean to seem like I'm having a go at the Bible all the time – it does have a great verse about pointing out the speck in your brother's eye.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:28 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
If anyone wants any evidence that morality is relative, this discussion is Exhibit A!

I personally think it's probably worse to hit a little child than an adult (force and consequential harm being equal), but I respect your opinion if you feel differently. I just hope you can appreciate the irony of condemning one as barbaric even while writing the kind of apologism for corporal punishment that many others in our society would find barbaric.

I don't mean to seem like I'm having a go at the Bible all the time – it does have a great verse about pointing out the speck in your brother's eye.


This is where you quote me wrong. When I smacked my kids they got a shock, a lesson and over it in no time, (apart from the lesson), when my dad hit me, my mum, my older sister, he was like rocky warming up. That is not the same thing. A smack on the back of the hand, a tap on the bum, you cannot compare.

And when this little puppy starts misbehaving or sticking his little nose where it shouldn't be, he will get a tap from my finger on his nose, or a little reminder on his backside, and once again, I will raise a well mannered, well adjusted, ridiculously happy dog.

I respect alot of what you say, and admire your ability to look from afar, but something's cannot be feneralized about. And you cannot compare a tap on the back of a child's hand with knocking someone out cold with a fist. If your talking about what was dished up to Daniel Valerio (I can't remember the exact spelling, but his little face with the bruised eye is burned into my memory) then yes, it's much much worse. And I can tell you now if I saw anyone I knew do that, I'd dog them into child services that minute.

You can take as many shots at the bible as you want, not much of it is relevant these days, if it ever was. But don't compare what those women are talking about to smacking a child, it's a whole different thing.

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:31 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

By the way, before boarding the outrage train, did anyone actually bother to watch the video in question?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/muslim-women-describe-how-men-10218040

Note the use of the phrase "should not cause pain", and the demonstration of the actual implements used, which seem almost purely ritualistic in nature – nothing to do with giving your wife a black eye.

TP, you say you once smacked your child so hard that you left a red mark on their leg – if what these women are saying is sincere, then a Muslim man doing that to his wife would be unacceptable. Again, I wish my Christian mother had been barbaric enough to hit me with a folded handkerchief!

I'm not defending the video, by the way: it is trivialising a serious problem in conservative religious communities and saying this sort of stuff is acceptable is probably the thin edge of the wedge. But the fact that this is causing such outrage while genuinely painful and humiliating discipline of children in the home is still shrugged at does seem a remarkable double standard to me.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace


Last edited by David on Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:42 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:38 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
By the way, before boarding the outrage train, did anyone actually bother to watch the video in question?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/muslim-women-describe-how-men-10218040

Note the use of the phrase "should not cause pain", and the demonstration of the actual implements used, which seem almost purely ritualistic in nature. And yet, TP, you say you once smacked your child so hard that you left a red mark on their leg. Again, I wish my Christian mother had been barbaric enough to hit me with a folded handkerchief!

I'm not defending the video, by the way: it is trivialising a serious problem in conservative religious communities and saying this sort of stuff is acceptable is probably the thin edge of the wedge. But the fact that this is causing such outrage while genuinely painful and humiliating discipline of children in the home is still shrugged at does seem a remarkable double standard to me.


what i actually said
" i smacked my children, but i never hit them. Even left a bit of a red mark on a bare leg once when the eldest nearly hurt herself on something she had been told no, shown why, explained why, but still tried to do! I make no apologies for it. It worked, she never did it again. "

but feel free to twist it and make me sound like a child killer.

your fighting this battle with totally the wrong person, i don't need to tell my childhood stories again, but unfortunately i know the difference all to well, as i believe, you do.

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:44 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not twisting it, just repeating what you said. Did you watch the video above? Why do you presume that they're condoning serious domestic violence of the kind you suffered?
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 1:31 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

just watched it again, have you never been smacked with a wet twisted tea towel!! let alone a short stick, but hey, if your missus is happy to go along, all power to you!!

(ps check out your spot in this weeks team!!)

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 1:56 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Did you see how small that stick was? Shocked I wasn't sure whether they were taking the piss or not.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2017 5:52 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/04/12/opinions/how-to-force-russias-hand-on-syria-hall/index.html?iid=ob_lockedrail_topeditorial

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 64, 65, 66 ... 72, 73, 74  Next
Page 65 of 74   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group