Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
How many Syrian refugees should Australia take?

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 56, 57, 58 ... 72, 73, 74  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  

How many Syrian refugees should Australia take?
None
52%
 52%  [ 21 ]
A few hundred
2%
 2%  [ 1 ]
A few thousand
5%
 5%  [ 2 ]
Over ten thousand
5%
 5%  [ 2 ]
As many as possible
35%
 35%  [ 14 ]
Total Votes : 40

Author Message
Culprit Cancer



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: Port Melbourne

PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2016 5:31 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

We have just announced a crackdown on welfare recipients and the very next day announced that we are increasing our quota of welfare recipients.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Skids Cancer

Quitting drinking will be one of the best choices you make in your life.


Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Location: Joined 3/6/02 . Member #175

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:59 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
Skids wrote:
Common sense by the Chinese. Of course, it's labelled as racist by the bleeding hearts club.

http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2016/09/07/chinese-airline-sparks-backlash-after-warning-passengers-to-beware-ethnic-minority-areas-in-london.html


Quote:
“London is generally a safe place to travel, however precautions are needed when entering areas mainly populated by Indians, Pakistanis and black people,” it reads.

“We advise tourists not to go out alone at night, and females always to be accompanied by another person when travelling.”


Indians are mostly Hindu and many Africans are Christian. Where does that fit in your "Muslims are terrible" hypothesis? Or has that always been a smokescreen for something else?


How silly of me, didn't realise the Hindus and Christians were committing all the attacks Rolling Eyes

_________________
Don't count the days, make the days count.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Skids Cancer

Quitting drinking will be one of the best choices you make in your life.


Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Location: Joined 3/6/02 . Member #175

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 12:01 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/immigration/muslim-migrant-ban-backed-by-almost-half-australians-poll-shows/news-story/fe65dc9cc7018e545539e32b11029385

The majority of Australians want gays to be able to marry AND they want muslim immigration to cease.... pleba what?



Forty-nine per cent of people surveyed in an Essential poll agreed that Muslims should be blocked from the country while 40 per cent disagreed with the idea. There was 60 per cent support for the ban among coalition voters, 40 per cent from Labor and a surprising 34 per cent from Greens voters.

_________________
Don't count the days, make the days count.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Culprit Cancer



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: Port Melbourne

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 1:19 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Best thing about the South American refugees is they do know how to cook up Cocaine in large batches.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 2:59 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Skids wrote:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/immigration/muslim-migrant-ban-backed-by-almost-half-australians-poll-shows/news-story/fe65dc9cc7018e545539e32b11029385

The majority of Australians want gays to be able to marry AND they want muslim immigration to cease.... pleba what?

Forty-nine per cent of people surveyed in an Essential poll agreed that Muslims should be blocked from the country while 40 per cent disagreed with the idea. There was 60 per cent support for the ban among coalition voters, 40 per cent from Labor and a surprising 34 per cent from Greens voters.

The actual data of these results is shown in the link below.

http://www.essentialvision.com.au/ban-on-muslim-immigration

http://www.essentialvision.com.au/reasons-for-supporting-ban

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:21 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

49% isn't a majority, but it's certainly uncomfortably close to one. Very dispiriting.

(It's funny how democracy works, though, sometimes – a majority of Australians support euthanasia and likely capital punishment too, yet those issues aren't even on the table for discussion. And who knows what the figures would be for questions that pollsters haven't thought to ask like "should child molesters be tortured?" and "should the government stop taxing people?")

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace


Last edited by David on Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:26 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Deja Vu 



Joined: 20 Apr 2008


PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:23 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Bucks5 wrote:
This is what Donald Trump Jnr thinks.....



If I had a bowl of Skittles and told you there was an epidemic of skittle-related deaths, would you look to do something about it or stand by your 2nd amendment right to have skittles?

_________________
http://youtu.be/hvtdbfI1sqQ
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:27 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^ Yes, that does come to mind somewhat. Also, the rates of domestic violence within relationships or driving-related deaths. The more you look, the more potentially lethal bowls of skittles there are.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Wokko Pisces

Come and take it.


Joined: 04 Oct 2005


PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:34 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
^ Yes, that does come to mind somewhat. Also, the rates of domestic violence within relationships or driving-related deaths. The more you look, the more potentially lethal bowls of skittles there are.


Feminists used the same analogy aimed at men a few years ago.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-09-20/donald-trump-jr-s-skittles-comparison-used-to-be-a-feminist-meme

The thing is that there are Islamic terrorists embedding themselves in refugee/migrant populations to attack the west and terrorism is about more than your chance to die, it's about our whole society and culture being changed. Until we can figure out how to weed out those guys from the huge moving population of military aged men then the best thing to do is to put a stop to it.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:42 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

"Until we figure it out" is just a lame cop out without specifying exactly what needs to be figured out, how it might be done and approximately how long it will take. The way Trump and others have used it is effectively the same thing as a shrug of the shoulders. It's meaningless.

re: the skittles, I think both memes are dumb. The feminist one actually makes me angry too – it basically says that treating men with prejudice is acceptable. But it's no less dumb than the anti-refugee one. Under your logic, why shouldn't women treat all men as potential rapists and DV perpetrators until "we figure out how to stop" rape and domestic violence? Doesn't sound great, does it.

I oppose both approaches, but I'm not sure how you can think one form of profiling is OK and another isn't.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:56 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Perhaps "The American Conservative" can put it better than I can:

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/racial-profiling-is-a-bad-counterterrorism-strategy/

Quote:
Many of Trump’s proposals, including profiling Muslims and infiltrating Muslim communities, were attempted in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. The reason most of those policies were abandoned had little to do with “PC culture” and a lot more to do with the high costs and poor results of the programs. That is, law enforcement has come to discourage profiling for the same reason intelligence services have disavowed torture: it simply doesn’t work—neither in theory nor in practice. Donald Trump has been ill-served by his rogues’ gallery of national-security and law-enforcement supporters who take a contrarian stance on these issues, as would be the American people if these supporters were allowed to implement their policies.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Wokko Pisces

Come and take it.


Joined: 04 Oct 2005


PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 4:44 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

"Racial" profiling has never been discussed, the author has discredited himself and if you look at the name may just be a tad biased.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 4:46 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Where did Racial profiling get never been discussed the author has discredited himself and if you look at the name may be a tad biased?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 8:27 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
49% isn't a majority, but it's certainly uncomfortably close to one. Very dispiriting.

(It's funny how democracy works, though, sometimes – a majority of Australians support euthanasia and likely capital punishment too, yet those issues aren't even on the table for discussion. And who knows what the figures would be for questions that pollsters haven't thought to ask like "should child molesters be tortured?" and "should the government stop taxing people?")


You got a cite for those stats?

Euthanasia is a bit like the republic debate, the majority might support it in principle but disagree on how it would work. If you had a poll on euthanasia and asked the question "Do you think the government should have the right to force you to prolong your life and therefore make you suffer in pain against your will?" you'd get a 100% NO vote and therefore a 100% vote for euthanasia.

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 2:08 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Wokko wrote:
"Racial" profiling has never been discussed, the author has discredited himself and if you look at the name may just be a tad biased.


Well, actually...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/09/20/donald-trump-doesnt-call-his-position-racial-profiling-it-is/

As for his name, I wasn't aware that being from an Arabic background rendered one's views on such matters irrelevant. That's a pretty terrible ad hominem attack.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 56, 57, 58 ... 72, 73, 74  Next
Page 57 of 74   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group