| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
| Post subject: Channel 7 Game Day chat |  |
|
Whilst discussing the Scum,s potential draft picks pick one appears assured.
And a point made that Kruzer being put up for trade would most likely give
them pick two.
If we wanted Kruzer have we a pick to offer
_________________
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
 |
BBHS 
bbhs
Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Location: Bellarine
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I assumed it was if he left via free agency and they got a first round compo pick
Last edited by BBHS on Sun Sep 06, 2015 12:54 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
BazBoy
Joined: 11 Sep 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I guess the free agent thing--to be honest dont know how it works.
Sure some one will advise.
_________________
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right |
|
|
|
|
BBHS
bbhs
Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Location: Bellarine
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Yeah same as us with Daisy. Will depend on the coin he gets which will then dictate the compo pick Carlton receive. The blues have already low balled him so I guess they are hoping he leaves. |
|
|
|
|
themonk
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| I wouldn't be surprised if we picked up Kruezer as a free agent. |
|
|
|
|
Deja Vu
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
The system is flawed. Kruezer gets pick 2? Frawley got pick 3 last year?
Meanwhile Adelaide will get pick 12 for Danger and the Hawks got 18 for Buddy.
Compensation picks should be 5, 15, 25, 35. Not after your first round pick which could be anywhere from 1 - 18.
Under this system Adelaide would get 5 for Danger, Blues would get 15 for Kruezer. Much fairer
_________________
http://youtu.be/hvtdbfI1sqQ |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
^^It's not supposed to be fair, it's part of equalisation. Agree that it's probably not right.
For real free agency though, there shouldn't be any compo pick at all.
_________________
Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| AN_Inkling wrote: | ^^It's not supposed to be fair, it's part of equalisation. Agree that it's probably not right.
For real free agency though, there shouldn't be any compo pick at all. |
I tend to agree but do think top 4 teams should be excluded as destination clubs. |
|
|
|
|
Rexy17
Joined: 09 Oct 2006
Location: Ballarat
|
| Post subject: | |
|
why not have the compo pick in the same spot of the club the player goes to.
_________________
B.U.M.S ROCK...That's Ballarat United Magpies Supporters.....Long trip but even longer hangovers! |
|
|
|
|
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Rexy17 wrote: | | why not have the compo pick in the same spot of the club the player goes to. |
In most US professional sports, you get your picks at the end of the first round.
_________________
Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk ....... |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
