| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
John Wren 
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: Stats to date suggest we're going ok |  |
|
everyone loves a stat. they can tell us so much or not much at all. just took a look at some of the stats to date and they suggest we are not far off the good teams. we're simply not getting reward for effort.
Inside50s: 6th (behind Haw, WCE, WB, Syd, Adel)
Marks Inside50: 6th (behind Haw, WCE, NM, Adel, Rich)
Rebound50s: 6th (behind Freo, WCE, Haw, Adel, Rich)
Goals: 7th
Behinds: 4th
Tackles: 2nd (behind Syd)
Disposal efficiency: 71.8%, 3rd worst (only a 3.75% differential between us and the top team, Haw 75.5%)
Clangers: 9th worst
Centre clearances: 14th
Clearances: 9th
Frees for: 14th
Frees against: 17th (second lowest behind WCE)
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
 |
BBHS 
bbhs
Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Location: Bellarine
|
| Post subject: | |
|
The top 5 suggest we should have comfortably made finals. 
On the other hand we got heavily scored against from Centre Clearance and rebound 50s. Got Nutted! |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| On balance the averages look okay but they got inflated rounds 1-11, deflated rounds 12+ |
|
|
|
|
doriswilgus
Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Location: the great southern land
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Centre clearances(14TH)is the biggest issue in all of those stats. |
|
|
|
|
themonk
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
|
| Post subject: Re: Stats to date suggest we're going ok | |
|
| John Wren wrote: | everyone loves a stat. they can tell us so much or not much at all. just took a look at some of the stats to date and they suggest we are not far off the good teams. we're simply not getting reward for effort.
Inside50s: 6th (behind Haw, WCE, WB, Syd, Adel)
Marks Inside50: 6th (behind Haw, WCE, NM, Adel, Rich)
Rebound50s: 6th (behind Freo, WCE, Haw, Adel, Rich)
Goals: 7th
Behinds: 4th
Tackles: 2nd (behind Syd)
Disposal efficiency: 71.8%, 3rd worst (only a 3.75% differential between us and the top team, Haw 75.5%)
Clangers: 9th worst
Centre clearances: 14th
Clearances: 9th
Frees for: 14th
Frees against: 17th (second lowest behind WCE) |
So even the stats indicate we need another 1 or 2 decent midfielders, Treloar & Aish?
The cherry is obviously a KPP |
|
|
|
|
3rd degree 
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Location: John Wren's tote
|
| Post subject: | |
|
" Maybe's don't make it so" - Leo , Miller's Crossing 1990.
_________________
" Ohhh Banksy and out comes the Note Book".
www.facebook/the hybernators |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| jackcass wrote: | | On balance the averages look okay but they got inflated rounds 1-11, deflated rounds 12+ |
if we win 2-3 of those close losses we'd be sitting where the numbers suggest we should be.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
Lazza
Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| John Wren wrote: | | jackcass wrote: | | On balance the averages look okay but they got inflated rounds 1-11, deflated rounds 12+ |
if we win 2-3 of those close losses we'd be sitting where the numbers suggest we should be. |
IF 
_________________
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine! |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Lazza wrote: | | John Wren wrote: | | jackcass wrote: | | On balance the averages look okay but they got inflated rounds 1-11, deflated rounds 12+ |
if we win 2-3 of those close losses we'd be sitting where the numbers suggest we should be. |
IF |
REALLY?! well done einstein.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
qldmagpie67
Joined: 18 Dec 2008
|
| Post subject: Re: Stats to date suggest we're going ok | |
|
| John Wren wrote: | everyone loves a stat. they can tell us so much or not much at all. just took a look at some of the stats to date and they suggest we are not far off the good teams. we're simply not getting reward for effort.
Inside50s: 6th (behind Haw, WCE, WB, Syd, Adel)
Marks Inside50: 6th (behind Haw, WCE, NM, Adel, Rich)
Rebound50s: 6th (behind Freo, WCE, Haw, Adel, Rich)
Goals: 7th
Behinds: 4th
Tackles: 2nd (behind Syd)
Disposal efficiency: 71.8%, 3rd worst (only a 3.75% differential between us and the top team, Haw 75.5%)
Clangers: 9th worst
Centre clearances: 14th
Clearances: 9th
Frees for: 14th
Frees against: 17th (second lowest behind WCE) |
Stats are interesting JW for sure
I posted the other day in a thread we arent as bad as many think and posed the same thing if we had kicked a couple straight instead of misses we could be anywhere. Yes Lazza IF but we've lost 6 games by less than 2 goals win half of those and were in 6/7th spot. We're close just need better execution and be better under pressure.
I would rather our list than many of those teams around us or below us and in some cases above us. |
|
|
|
|
Lazza
Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| John Wren wrote: | | Lazza wrote: | | John Wren wrote: | | jackcass wrote: | | On balance the averages look okay but they got inflated rounds 1-11, deflated rounds 12+ |
if we win 2-3 of those close losses we'd be sitting where the numbers suggest we should be. |
IF |
REALLY?! well done einstein. |
Yes JW, IF. 
IF my aunty had balls, she would be my uncle.
IF never solves a problem, simply compounds it...... 
_________________
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine! |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Given our shocking stats for clearances, it's no wonder the club is after someone like Treloar. Given we have Pendles, Swanny, Adams, Crisp, Sidey and more recently Greenwood, I expected us to perform much better in this area. Partly, it must be due to our relatively poor ruck performances, though in terms of hitouts they haven't been too bad this year. So this confirms our top recruiting target - get a top midfielder. |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Lazza wrote: | | John Wren wrote: | | Lazza wrote: | | John Wren wrote: | | jackcass wrote: | | On balance the averages look okay but they got inflated rounds 1-11, deflated rounds 12+ |
if we win 2-3 of those close losses we'd be sitting where the numbers suggest we should be. |
IF |
REALLY?! well done einstein. |
Yes JW, IF.
IF my aunty had balls, she would be my uncle.
IF never solves a problem, simply compounds it...... |
if only jackcass never mentioned you wearing a mankini. that's an image one cannot erase easily. 
unfortunately, we are consigned to undertake retrospectives and look at hypotheticals. in spite of the results, i have been buoyant about our prospects for some time and remain so. we're not far off playing finals again, and some pundits are talking about this year as us bottoming out. if that's the case then it can only be sunshine and lollipops ahead of us.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
thompsoc
Joined: 21 Sep 2009
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Read an article the other day that mentioned specifically that a small difference in disposal efficiency made a big difference.
But given my dislike for Stats I think it is obvious to the naked eye that our kicking is poor and our clearance work is not flash.
_________________
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest. |
|
|
|
|
3rd degree
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Location: John Wren's tote
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| RudeBoy wrote: | | Given our shocking stats for clearances, it's no wonder the club is after someone like Treloar. Given we have Pendles, Swanny, Adams, Crisp, Sidey and more recently Greenwood, I expected us to perform much better in this area. Partly, it must be due to our relatively poor ruck performances, though in terms of hitouts they haven't been too bad this year. So this confirms our top recruiting target - get a top midfielder. |
Yeah I agree I thought it would turn around, but the new lads have to get used to playing together i guess! but it would be nice to see us win the clearances occasionaly
_________________
" Ohhh Banksy and out comes the Note Book".
www.facebook/the hybernators |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
