View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
5150
Joined: 31 Aug 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
3rd degree wrote: | Darkstranger wrote: | I'd take Lobbe, not getting a game at Port because of the mercenary Ryder, so can we? |
Yeah Lobbe would be handy , he can kick goals and is harder at it than Mark Seaby! |
He is no Tom Derickxxx |
|
|
|
|
Magpie-Pep
Joined: 25 Jun 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
forward to 2017.....
"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....
FULL STOP.. _________________ Are we ready for another tilt... |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
Magpie-Pep wrote: | forward to 2017.....
"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....
FULL STOP.. |
The potential is definitely there. A lot will need to go right however. They are already doing OK in the hitouts department. Mainly I just want to see them holding a few more marks, so they can have some impact around the ground. |
|
|
|
|
woftam
I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.
Joined: 28 Jul 2008 Location: Carum Downs, Vic
|
Post subject: | |
|
RudeBoy wrote: | Magpie-Pep wrote: | forward to 2017.....
"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....
FULL STOP.. |
The potential is definitely there. A lot will need to go right however. They are already doing OK in the hitouts department. Mainly I just want to see them holding a few more marks, so they can have some impact around the ground. |
It will come Rudeboy. In a couple of years we will be reaping the benefit of giving them so much senior experience. |
|
|
|
|
neil
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 Location: Queensland
|
Post subject: | |
|
woftam wrote: | RudeBoy wrote: | Magpie-Pep wrote: | forward to 2017.....
"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....
FULL STOP.. |
The potential is definitely there. A lot will need to go right however. They are already doing OK in the hitouts department. Mainly I just want to see them holding a few more marks, so they can have some impact around the ground. |
It will come Rudeboy. In a couple of years we will be reaping the benefit of giving them so much senior experience. |
This is why any talk of trading Witts is insane
You trade from areas you have extra players not a shortage.
Trade Witts and then recruit a ruckman is a no win situation _________________ Carlscum 120 years being cheating scum |
|
|
|
|
Darkstranger
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
|
Post subject: | |
|
You must be watching another game, Grundy & Wiits have never taken a mark overhead let alone a pack mark. _________________ There is Collingwood and then the rest. |
|
|
|
|
ronrat
Joined: 22 May 2006 Location: Thailand
|
Post subject: | |
|
What do you mean 'we'?[/quote]
nick's. i thought 'we' were onto something with the open letters.[/quote]
I smell a rat.[/quote]
I am in Thailand and shower up to 3 times a day.And use deoorant. _________________ Annoying opposition supporters since 1967. |
|
|
|
|
Piethagoras' Theorem
the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk
Joined: 29 May 2006
|
Post subject: | |
|
Magpie-Pep wrote: | forward to 2017.....
"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....
FULL STOP.. |
I'll go with that! _________________ Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood. |
|
|
|
|
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Location: The 18
|
Post subject: | |
|
neil wrote: | woftam wrote: | RudeBoy wrote: | Magpie-Pep wrote: | forward to 2017.....
"grundy and witts are best 1-2 ruck combination in the comp".....
FULL STOP.. |
The potential is definitely there. A lot will need to go right however. They are already doing OK in the hitouts department. Mainly I just want to see them holding a few more marks, so they can have some impact around the ground. |
It will come Rudeboy. In a couple of years we will be reaping the benefit of giving them so much senior experience. |
This is why any talk of trading Witts is insane
You trade from areas you have extra players not a shortage.
Trade Witts and then recruit a ruckman is a no win situation |
It could easily be under the right circumstances.
Witts for Carlisle as an example.
Kreuzer for nothing via F/A.
A rapidly developing Cox in reserve.
Our side would be stronger next year IMO if that was to occur. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
The more I think about it the more it makes sense.
Kreuzer is a ready made top line ruckman and at a club like ours a clear match winner. Grundy is a future top ruckman. Meanwhile Cox is progressing faster than expected. That leaves Witts as possible trade bait.
I like it. |
|
|
|
|
roar
Joined: 01 Sep 2004
|
Post subject: | |
|
The kid can play but I'd be worried about his body not holding up to the rigours of afl. _________________ kill for collingwood! |
|
|
|
|
Deja Vu
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
|
Post subject: | |
|
Any chance we could use free agency to nab a good player, rather than a broken down fragile hack?
Young. Lynch. Now Kruezer?
Are we trying to repay the Blues for taking Daisy off our hands?
Please... _________________ http://youtu.be/hvtdbfI1sqQ |
|
|
|
|
Dangles
Balmey Army
Joined: 14 May 2015
|
Post subject: | |
|
They obviously want to bring Kruezer in to replace Toovey. |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003 Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
roar wrote: | The kid can play but I'd be worried about his body not holding up to the rigours of afl. |
This is my concern too...
We don't want a karmic-Karlton pay-back for Thoma$, with a renown injured player on big money sitting in the stands watching the seniors, for extended periods of time. _________________ M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
|