 |
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
The Prototype 
Paint my face with a good-for-nothin smile.
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
|
|
|
 |
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
Sam Grimley fits a need for us as well in KPF depth ... might be worth a look.
_________________
All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
Woods Of Ypres
Joined: 27 May 2003
Location: Yugoslavia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MightyMagpie wrote: | | Sam Grimley fits a need for us as well in KPF depth ... might be worth a look. |
agree lets get the Reaper! |
|
|
|
|
Dave The Man 
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MightyMagpie wrote: | | Sam Grimley fits a need for us as well in KPF depth ... might be worth a look. |
As well with Mason Shaw and Mitchell Harvey
_________________
I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
Dave The Man
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Was Great to Finally Land Big Fish in Trade Week
_________________
I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
think positive 
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Dave The Man wrote: | | Was Great to Finally Land Big Fish in Trade Week |
Spot on Dave, can you believe it? We got everything we wanted, and didn't get taken to the cleaners in the process, gotta be happy with that!
Maybe Karma is swinging our way for a change, cheers mate, keep the updates coming ,
Hope your mouth has recovered xx
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
The Prototype
Paint my face with a good-for-nothin smile.
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
|
|
|
|
Domesticated_Ape 
Joined: 01 Oct 2012
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MJ23 wrote: | | Domesticated_Ape wrote: | | AN_Inkling wrote: | This is what we thought the year we drafted Langdon and Marsh. Dekka had said the depth of the draft was ordinary and we likely wouldn't use late picks  .
Agree though, seems more than likely we use those picks to upgrade a couple of rookies than bring in a draftee, but wouldn't rule out a Hine special. |
I reckon it depends on how high some of these academy bids are because there's a chance that our late picks could move up the order quite a bit.
With a bit of luck 66 could become 52, 77-60, 83-65 and 84-66. Looking at the draft order, the picks between 33 and 44 are mostly going to points.
Not sure if that will change Hine's thinking, but it's worth noting. |
Read what a few have said we may do.
Not sure Abbott and Gault will be elevated - frost will you'd think. I love Abbott but think they might hold off for now.
We've lost 8 senior players and brought in 3 with one Maybe two rookie upgrades.
We Would use our first draft pick youd think, then rookie up to the list number we are aiming for.
I have a feeling though we may bring in one more senior player. Might be a current delisted player onto the senior list,however I get a feeling we could run with a VFL player as a rookie.
Really wouldn't mind Still or young Pendleberry from our VFL side. |
I dunno, wouldn't put it past Hine to have one or two up his sleeve as late picks, I could see us drafting 3 new players, potentially.
Wouldn't mind if Ryan Pendlebury was one of them actually. Haven't seen enough of Still, but you do hear good things from regular VFL watchers. |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MJ23 wrote: | | Domesticated_Ape wrote: | | AN_Inkling wrote: | This is what we thought the year we drafted Langdon and Marsh. Dekka had said the depth of the draft was ordinary and we likely wouldn't use late picks .
Agree though, seems more than likely we use those picks to upgrade a couple of rookies than bring in a draftee, but wouldn't rule out a Hine special. |
I reckon it depends on how high some of these academy bids are because there's a chance that our late picks could move up the order quite a bit.
With a bit of luck 66 could become 52, 77-60, 83-65 and 84-66. Looking at the draft order, the picks between 33 and 44 are mostly going to points.
Not sure if that will change Hine's thinking, but it's worth noting. |
Read what a few have said we may do.
Not sure Abbott and Gault will be elevated - frost will you'd think. I love Abbott but think they might hold off for now.
We've lost 8 senior players and brought in 3 with one Maybe two rookie upgrades.
We Would use our first draft pick youd think, then rookie up to the list number we are aiming for.
I have a feeling though we may bring in one more senior player. Might be a current delisted player onto the senior list,however I get a feeling we could run with a VFL player as a rookie.
Really wouldn't mind Still or young Pendleberry from our VFL side. |
You can't "rookie up to the list number we are aiming for". The primary list is separate from the rookie list and the primary list is 38-40. From here we can sign delisted FAs, promote existing rookies or draft new players in the national draft. Anyway, we need to get to a minimum of 38 so in the absence of signing delisted FAs we will be promoting rookies or using late draft picks to make the 38.
_________________
All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| What was the question again? |
|
|
|
|
MJ23
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Location: Sydney
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MightyMagpie wrote: | | MJ23 wrote: | | Domesticated_Ape wrote: | | AN_Inkling wrote: | This is what we thought the year we drafted Langdon and Marsh. Dekka had said the depth of the draft was ordinary and we likely wouldn't use late picks .
Agree though, seems more than likely we use those picks to upgrade a couple of rookies than bring in a draftee, but wouldn't rule out a Hine special. |
I reckon it depends on how high some of these academy bids are because there's a chance that our late picks could move up the order quite a bit.
With a bit of luck 66 could become 52, 77-60, 83-65 and 84-66. Looking at the draft order, the picks between 33 and 44 are mostly going to points.
Not sure if that will change Hine's thinking, but it's worth noting. |
Read what a few have said we may do.
Not sure Abbott and Gault will be elevated - frost will you'd think. I love Abbott but think they might hold off for now.
We've lost 8 senior players and brought in 3 with one Maybe two rookie upgrades.
We Would use our first draft pick youd think, then rookie up to the list number we are aiming for.
I have a feeling though we may bring in one more senior player. Might be a current delisted player onto the senior list,however I get a feeling we could run with a VFL player as a rookie.
Really wouldn't mind Still or young Pendleberry from our VFL side. |
You can't "rookie up to the list number we are aiming for". The primary list is separate from the rookie list and the primary list is 38-40. From here we can sign delisted FAs, promote existing rookies or draft new players in the national draft. Anyway, we need to get to a minimum of 38 so in the absence of signing delisted FAs we will be promoting rookies or using late draft picks to make the 38. |
Choice of words aside, that's what I meant.
Our senior list number could be 40 plus 4 rookies, or we could increase the number of rookies and "rookie up" to 38 or 39 only senior listed players.
Rookie up meaning if we keep the senior list at 38 we can use the additional 2 spots on rookies carrying 6 instead of just the 4.
This could open the door to our own or other state level players.
I really think we will use two picks on players max 3.
_________________
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MJ23 wrote: | | MightyMagpie wrote: | | MJ23 wrote: | | Domesticated_Ape wrote: | | AN_Inkling wrote: | This is what we thought the year we drafted Langdon and Marsh. Dekka had said the depth of the draft was ordinary and we likely wouldn't use late picks .
Agree though, seems more than likely we use those picks to upgrade a couple of rookies than bring in a draftee, but wouldn't rule out a Hine special. |
I reckon it depends on how high some of these academy bids are because there's a chance that our late picks could move up the order quite a bit.
With a bit of luck 66 could become 52, 77-60, 83-65 and 84-66. Looking at the draft order, the picks between 33 and 44 are mostly going to points.
Not sure if that will change Hine's thinking, but it's worth noting. |
Read what a few have said we may do.
Not sure Abbott and Gault will be elevated - frost will you'd think. I love Abbott but think they might hold off for now.
We've lost 8 senior players and brought in 3 with one Maybe two rookie upgrades.
We Would use our first draft pick youd think, then rookie up to the list number we are aiming for.
I have a feeling though we may bring in one more senior player. Might be a current delisted player onto the senior list,however I get a feeling we could run with a VFL player as a rookie.
Really wouldn't mind Still or young Pendleberry from our VFL side. |
You can't "rookie up to the list number we are aiming for". The primary list is separate from the rookie list and the primary list is 38-40. From here we can sign delisted FAs, promote existing rookies or draft new players in the national draft. Anyway, we need to get to a minimum of 38 so in the absence of signing delisted FAs we will be promoting rookies or using late draft picks to make the 38. |
Choice of words aside, that's what I meant.
Our senior list number could be 40 plus 4 rookies, or we could increase the number of rookies and "rookie up" to 38 or 39 only senior listed players.
Rookie up meaning if we keep the senior list at 38 we can use the additional 2 spots on rookies carrying 6 instead of just the 4.
This could open the door to our own or other state level players.
I really think we will use two picks on players max 3. |
ok well we have 4 spots to fill to get to 38.
_________________
All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
MJ23
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Location: Sydney
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MightyMagpie wrote: | | MJ23 wrote: | | MightyMagpie wrote: | | MJ23 wrote: | | Domesticated_Ape wrote: | | AN_Inkling wrote: | This is what we thought the year we drafted Langdon and Marsh. Dekka had said the depth of the draft was ordinary and we likely wouldn't use late picks .
Agree though, seems more than likely we use those picks to upgrade a couple of rookies than bring in a draftee, but wouldn't rule out a Hine special. |
I reckon it depends on how high some of these academy bids are because there's a chance that our late picks could move up the order quite a bit.
With a bit of luck 66 could become 52, 77-60, 83-65 and 84-66. Looking at the draft order, the picks between 33 and 44 are mostly going to points.
Not sure if that will change Hine's thinking, but it's worth noting. |
Read what a few have said we may do.
Not sure Abbott and Gault will be elevated - frost will you'd think. I love Abbott but think they might hold off for now.
We've lost 8 senior players and brought in 3 with one Maybe two rookie upgrades.
We Would use our first draft pick youd think, then rookie up to the list number we are aiming for.
I have a feeling though we may bring in one more senior player. Might be a current delisted player onto the senior list,however I get a feeling we could run with a VFL player as a rookie.
Really wouldn't mind Still or young Pendleberry from our VFL side. |
You can't "rookie up to the list number we are aiming for". The primary list is separate from the rookie list and the primary list is 38-40. From here we can sign delisted FAs, promote existing rookies or draft new players in the national draft. Anyway, we need to get to a minimum of 38 so in the absence of signing delisted FAs we will be promoting rookies or using late draft picks to make the 38. |
Choice of words aside, that's what I meant.
Our senior list number could be 40 plus 4 rookies, or we could increase the number of rookies and "rookie up" to 38 or 39 only senior listed players.
Rookie up meaning if we keep the senior list at 38 we can use the additional 2 spots on rookies carrying 6 instead of just the 4.
This could open the door to our own or other state level players.
I really think we will use two picks on players max 3. |
ok well we have 4 spots to fill to get to 38. |
Yep. Upgrade frost draft in three or upgrade frost plus either Abbott or Gault and draft in two.
_________________
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan |
|
|
|
|
MightyMagpie
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MJ23 wrote: | | MightyMagpie wrote: | | MJ23 wrote: | | MightyMagpie wrote: | | MJ23 wrote: | | Domesticated_Ape wrote: | | AN_Inkling wrote: | This is what we thought the year we drafted Langdon and Marsh. Dekka had said the depth of the draft was ordinary and we likely wouldn't use late picks .
Agree though, seems more than likely we use those picks to upgrade a couple of rookies than bring in a draftee, but wouldn't rule out a Hine special. |
I reckon it depends on how high some of these academy bids are because there's a chance that our late picks could move up the order quite a bit.
With a bit of luck 66 could become 52, 77-60, 83-65 and 84-66. Looking at the draft order, the picks between 33 and 44 are mostly going to points.
Not sure if that will change Hine's thinking, but it's worth noting. |
Read what a few have said we may do.
Not sure Abbott and Gault will be elevated - frost will you'd think. I love Abbott but think they might hold off for now.
We've lost 8 senior players and brought in 3 with one Maybe two rookie upgrades.
We Would use our first draft pick youd think, then rookie up to the list number we are aiming for.
I have a feeling though we may bring in one more senior player. Might be a current delisted player onto the senior list,however I get a feeling we could run with a VFL player as a rookie.
Really wouldn't mind Still or young Pendleberry from our VFL side. |
You can't "rookie up to the list number we are aiming for". The primary list is separate from the rookie list and the primary list is 38-40. From here we can sign delisted FAs, promote existing rookies or draft new players in the national draft. Anyway, we need to get to a minimum of 38 so in the absence of signing delisted FAs we will be promoting rookies or using late draft picks to make the 38. |
Choice of words aside, that's what I meant.
Our senior list number could be 40 plus 4 rookies, or we could increase the number of rookies and "rookie up" to 38 or 39 only senior listed players.
Rookie up meaning if we keep the senior list at 38 we can use the additional 2 spots on rookies carrying 6 instead of just the 4.
This could open the door to our own or other state level players.
I really think we will use two picks on players max 3. |
ok well we have 4 spots to fill to get to 38. |
Yep. Upgrade frost draft in three or upgrade frost plus either Abbott or Gault and draft in two. |
I think we are on the same page. As per my earlier post:
| MightyMagpie wrote: | Assuming 38 on primary list then:
#27
if #66 > Abbott/Cox, then #66, else promote Abbott/Cox
if #77 > Gault, then #77, else promote Gault
if #83 > Frost, then #83, else promote Frost (pretty much certain this will be Frost)
Assuming 39 on primary list then:
#27
#66
if #77 > Abbott/Cox, then #77, else promote Abbott/Cox
if #83 > Gault, then #83, else promote Gault
if #84 > Frost, then #84, else promote Frost (pretty much certain this will be Frost)
Assuming 40 on primary list then:
#27
#66
#77
if #83 > Abbott/Cox, then #83, else promote Abbott/Cox
if #84 > Gault, then #84, else promote Gault
if #101 > Frost, then #101, else promote Frost (pretty much certain this will be Frost) |
_________________
All We Can Be |
|
|
|
|
The Prototype
Paint my face with a good-for-nothin smile.
Joined: 23 Apr 2003
Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
