Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Who is our trade bait

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2015 4:37 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr Burns 17 wrote:
Kennedy has zero value. Will be delisted rather than traded. Seedsman's currency is possibly a third rounder at absolute best. Scharenberg would not get us a first rounder as he has only played two games. And to even place Karnezis as a possible trade name. Turn it up. Will be delisted.


Sadly you're probably right on most scores there Mr B, though given that Scharenberg was such an early first round draft pick, with huge raps on him from most experts, and the fact that he now appears to be over his injuries, I still think he's worth a first round pick. He's ready to step straight into a senior side, unlike most draft picks who often need a year or two in the ressies before they are ready for the seniors.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
swoop42 Virgo

Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?


Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Location: The 18

PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2015 10:49 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Scharenberg will easily fetch a first rounder between 10 to 15.

In a shallow draft don't discount a late 2nd or mid 3rd round for Kennedy or Seedsman.

_________________
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dave The Man Scorpio



Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2015 10:58 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

swoop42 wrote:
Scharenberg will easily fetch a first rounder between 10 to 15.

In a shallow draft don't discount a late 2nd or mid 3rd round for Kennedy or Seedsman.


BK is worth more then a 3rd Rounder

_________________
I am Da Man
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Warnings : 1 
inxs88 



Joined: 17 Aug 2014


PostPosted: Wed Aug 19, 2015 11:57 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr Burns 17 wrote:
Kennedy has zero value. Will be delisted rather than traded. Seedsman's currency is possibly a third rounder at absolute best. Scharenberg would not get us a first rounder as he has only played two games. And to even place Karnezis as a possible trade name. Turn it up. Will be delisted.


Off the charts with these comments:

* Kennedy is contracted and still has gravitas in the market place
* Seedsman has "alleged" traits such as kicking, height and speed that somebody would stump up a second rounder for him
* Scharenberg would command a first rounder from SA

_________________
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Mr Burns 17 



Joined: 10 May 2004


PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 1:39 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The only way any club would offer a first rounder for Scharenberg on his two game career, is if there was a sweetener. And with Kennedy, can someone name me five good games he has played (I know one against Gold Coast)? I know he is sub a lot. Cannot run out a full game obviously. Unfortunately we rate our players higher than anyone else, which is understandable and DTM I respect your opinion as you watch a lot of footy, but Ben wont be in demand and definitely not third round.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
thompsoc 



Joined: 21 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 1:58 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr Burns 17 wrote:
Kennedy has zero value. Will be delisted rather than traded. Seedsman's currency is possibly a third rounder at absolute best. Scharenberg would not get us a first rounder as he has only played two games. And to even place Karnezis as a possible trade name. Turn it up. Will be delisted.

I've watched kennedy enough in the VFL to know that he has value.
Seedsman has run and carry which is highly sort after, but I don't think he gets on with Bucks.
The Berg will easily command a first round pick... they would be lining up for him.
PK hasn't got much value but I think he can still make it.
But it is all just opinions ... so who knows.

_________________
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
thompsoc 



Joined: 21 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 2:02 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr Burns 17 wrote:
The only way any club would offer a first rounder for Scharenberg on his two game career, is if there was a sweetener. And with Kennedy, can someone name me five good games he has played (I know one against Gold Coast)? I know he is sub a lot. Cannot run out a full game obviously. Unfortunately we rate our players higher than anyone else, which is understandable and DTM I respect your opinion as you watch a lot of footy, but Ben wont be in demand and definitely not third round.

Kennedy is a real hardnut, he is a tackling machine in the VFL.
He gets the ball every few minutes.
The problem with Kennedy is his kicking but I did see see 2 long goals on the weekend which warmed my heart as I was thinking he couldn't make 35 metres anymore.

_________________
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
jackcass Cancer



Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo

PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 3:32 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr Burns 17 wrote:
The only way any club would offer a first rounder for Scharenberg on his two game career, is if there was a sweetener. And with Kennedy, can someone name me five good games he has played (I know one against Gold Coast)? I know he is sub a lot. Cannot run out a full game obviously. Unfortunately we rate our players higher than anyone else, which is understandable and DTM I respect your opinion as you watch a lot of footy, but Ben wont be in demand and definitely not third round.


I don't get this. We appropriately rate our players because we actually know something about them. We watch their VFL development, we monitor their progress, we make informed decisions about their prospects. If anything we under rate opposition players but predominantly it's done in ignorance rather than any pro-Collingwood approach.

Anyone who has watched BK play VFL realises he'll be more than handy at senior level if/when he can bring that level of performance. Some players do it in their first year, some take longer. Add the kids injury issues and I remain very confident he's a keeper so an early 2nd round pick isn't unrealistic. Ditto Shaz. He's shown steady progress this season and that combined with his injury history and his pre-draft profile would attract a late 1st round at the very least.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 3:37 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

jackcass wrote:
Mr Burns 17 wrote:
The only way any club would offer a first rounder for Scharenberg on his two game career, is if there was a sweetener. And with Kennedy, can someone name me five good games he has played (I know one against Gold Coast)? I know he is sub a lot. Cannot run out a full game obviously. Unfortunately we rate our players higher than anyone else, which is understandable and DTM I respect your opinion as you watch a lot of footy, but Ben wont be in demand and definitely not third round.


I don't get this. We appropriately rate our players because we actually know something about them. We watch their VFL development, we monitor their progress, we make informed decisions about their prospects. If anything we under rate opposition players but predominantly it's done in ignorance rather than any pro-Collingwood approach.

Anyone who has watched BK play VFL realises he'll be more than handy at senior level if/when he can bring that level of performance. Some players do it in their first year, some take longer. Add the kids injury issues and I remain very confident he's a keeper so an early 2nd round pick isn't unrealistic.


If we truly rated him as an early 2nd round draft pick, then surely we'd be keeping him on our list. If we decide to trade him it's because we don't rate him.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
inxs88 



Joined: 17 Aug 2014


PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 3:40 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

jackcass wrote:
Mr Burns 17 wrote:
The only way any club would offer a first rounder for Scharenberg on his two game career, is if there was a sweetener. And with Kennedy, can someone name me five good games he has played (I know one against Gold Coast)? I know he is sub a lot. Cannot run out a full game obviously. Unfortunately we rate our players higher than anyone else, which is understandable and DTM I respect your opinion as you watch a lot of footy, but Ben wont be in demand and definitely not third round.


I don't get this. We appropriately rate our players because we actually know something about them. We watch their VFL development, we monitor their progress, we make informed decisions about their prospects. If anything we under rate opposition players but predominantly it's done in ignorance rather than any pro-Collingwood approach.

100% agree Jackcass!!

Anyone who has watched BK play VFL realises he'll be more than handy at senior level if/when he can bring that level of performance. Some players do it in their first year, some take longer. Add the kids injury issues and I remain very confident he's a keeper so an early 2nd round pick isn't unrealistic. Ditto Shaz. He's shown steady progress this season and that combined with his injury history and his pre-draft profile would attract a late 1st round at the very least.
Very Happy Very Happy


100% agree Jackcass Very Happy

_________________
I love the Pies, hate Carlscum
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
jackcass Cancer



Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo

PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 4:10 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

RudeBoy wrote:
jackcass wrote:
Mr Burns 17 wrote:
The only way any club would offer a first rounder for Scharenberg on his two game career, is if there was a sweetener. And with Kennedy, can someone name me five good games he has played (I know one against Gold Coast)? I know he is sub a lot. Cannot run out a full game obviously. Unfortunately we rate our players higher than anyone else, which is understandable and DTM I respect your opinion as you watch a lot of footy, but Ben wont be in demand and definitely not third round.


I don't get this. We appropriately rate our players because we actually know something about them. We watch their VFL development, we monitor their progress, we make informed decisions about their prospects. If anything we under rate opposition players but predominantly it's done in ignorance rather than any pro-Collingwood approach.

Anyone who has watched BK play VFL realises he'll be more than handy at senior level if/when he can bring that level of performance. Some players do it in their first year, some take longer. Add the kids injury issues and I remain very confident he's a keeper so an early 2nd round pick isn't unrealistic.


If we truly rated him as an early 2nd round draft pick, then surely we'd be keeping him on our list. If we decide to trade him it's because we don't rate him.


Yep, don't think BK will be going anywhere.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 4:13 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I often wonder if run out a full game can.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
roar 



Joined: 01 Sep 2004


PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 4:17 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Would Sidey carry enough currency for a top 10 pick.
_________________
kill for collingwood!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
neil Sagittarius



Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Location: Queensland

PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 4:54 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

roar wrote:
Would Sidey carry enough currency for a top 10 pick.


Get more for Pendlebury and as likely to happen

_________________
Carlscum 120 years being cheating scum
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
roar 



Joined: 01 Sep 2004


PostPosted: Thu Aug 20, 2015 4:56 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

That didn't answer my question.
_________________
kill for collingwood!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 5 of 10   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group