Moore or less?
Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dave The Man 
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| ad4eva wrote: | Despite two poor kicks from White, he has been quite solid the last month, he has provided a contest and hit the scoreboard which is all we can ask.
Moore offers a point of difference and i think we give him 3-4 weeks to see what dividends that pays, which then allows us to make a decision on what set up we take into finals (assuming we're a player).
Im still not sold on the Witts/Grundy combination. I like both individually, but we can look slow with the pair and I'm yet to see us dominate a ruck dual. |
Agree - Give him a few more games at AFL Level to see what he can do.
I think he would work well with Both Witts and Grundy in the Side
_________________
I am Da Man |
|
|
|
 |
jackcass 
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Dave The Man wrote: | | ad4eva wrote: | Despite two poor kicks from White, he has been quite solid the last month, he has provided a contest and hit the scoreboard which is all we can ask.
Moore offers a point of difference and i think we give him 3-4 weeks to see what dividends that pays, which then allows us to make a decision on what set up we take into finals (assuming we're a player).
Im still not sold on the Witts/Grundy combination. I like both individually, but we can look slow with the pair and I'm yet to see us dominate a ruck dual. |
Agree - Give him a few more games at AFL Level to see what he can do.
I think he would work well with Both Witts and Grundy in the Side |
So you want to have Cloke, White, Moore, and Witts/Grundy in the F50 |
|
|
|
|
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| jackcass wrote: | | Dave The Man wrote: | | ad4eva wrote: | Despite two poor kicks from White, he has been quite solid the last month, he has provided a contest and hit the scoreboard which is all we can ask.
Moore offers a point of difference and i think we give him 3-4 weeks to see what dividends that pays, which then allows us to make a decision on what set up we take into finals (assuming we're a player).
Im still not sold on the Witts/Grundy combination. I like both individually, but we can look slow with the pair and I'm yet to see us dominate a ruck dual. |
Agree - Give him a few more games at AFL Level to see what he can do.
I think he would work well with Both Witts and Grundy in the Side |
So you want to have Cloke, White, Moore, and Witts/Grundy in the F50 |
I would also put Reid and Big Mason Cox in there as well.
_________________
Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk ....... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
