Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Pre match. Pies v. Bombers - All comments please

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dave The Man Scorpio



Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:38 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

mattys123 wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:
mattys123 wrote:


Witts and Adams in, Patty and Gault out, let's smash em.


Would Bringing in Witts make us too Slow?

Play Moore I reckon as he can Rebound out of Defense


Playing Moore against Essendon would weaken us significantly. He's not ready for senior football yet, he probably won't be till next year, yet some want him to play against a side that beat Hawthorn 2 weeks ago?

Playing on Daniher or Carlisle up forward he'd be slaughtered, absolutely smashed, you just had to see McCartin last week to realise that.


IF Moore not being Ready for AFL. Then why is Bucks telling the Media that Moore is under real consideration to being Brought in?

Moore would not be playing as a KPD he be 3rd Tall or even better as a Loose Men in Defence where he can Provide some ReBound.

Then Moore should spend the Year in the VFL and then Build Up more over Next Pre-Season

_________________
I am Da Man
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Warnings : 1 
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:00 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

On Bomber TV,

Dr Reid was saying that Zaharakis got a knock on his knee but was moving all right & said Carlisle had a groin strain but was moving freely today.

He also said Hird was a selfish c*nt & pr*ck - but that was edited out.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Funkadelic 



Joined: 17 Feb 2010


PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 12:41 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

^haha! Very good
_________________
Tear the roof off tha sucker!!!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
swoop42 Virgo

Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?


Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Location: The 18

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:11 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

mattys123 wrote:
Dave The Man wrote:
mattys123 wrote:


Witts and Adams in, Patty and Gault out, let's smash em.


Would Bringing in Witts make us too Slow?

Play Moore I reckon as he can Rebound out of Defense


Playing Moore against Essendon would weaken us significantly. He's not ready for senior football yet, he probably won't be till next year, yet some want him to play against a side that beat Hawthorn 2 weeks ago?

Playing on Daniher or Carlisle up forward he'd be slaughtered, absolutely smashed, you just had to see McCartin last week to realise that.


Not sure why you're getting your knickers in knot.

It's not like we pick the team. Razz

I'd argue there is very little difference in playing Gault with all of his 2 game AFL experience to Moore a more highly rated junior talent.

Moore needs to play as the 3rd tall forward IMO if he comes in, less pressure and responsibility while his mobility and healthy attitude towards a contest should at least allow him to apply good defensive pressure if nothing else.

_________________
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
TimetoFly 



Joined: 14 Apr 2008


PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 2:04 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Out gault williams
In witts Adams

Toovey brown. Ramsey

Langdon. Frost. Oxley

Varcoe swan. Crisp

Karnezis cloke. Broomhead

Elliot. White witts

Foll Grundy pendels adams

Inter Blair goldsack. Dwyer seedsman

_________________
Collingwood a way of life!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Culprit Cancer



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: Port Melbourne

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 8:35 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

TimetoFly wrote:
Out gault williams
In witts Adams

Toovey brown. Ramsey

Langdon. Frost. Oxley

Varcoe swan. Crisp

Karnezis cloke. Broomhead

Elliot. White witts

Foll Grundy pendels adams

Inter Blair goldsack. Dwyer seedsman
I like the inclusion of Witts, I have not seen him play in the VFL to see if he is ready for a full AFL game yet.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
MagpieMad Leo

One in, All in!!


Joined: 15 Jan 2001
Location: -37.798563,144.996641

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 1:09 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

mattys123′s Match Preview Round 04 Collingwood vs Essendon is up on the site.

http://www.magpies.net/nick/?p=1568

thnx matt

_________________
Pain heals, Chicks dig scars, Glory..... lasts forever!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MagpieBat 



Joined: 27 Nov 2010
Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:11 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

IN: Adams, Witts
OUT: Karnezis, Gault

Sad to see Patty make way, but Adams comes straight back in and Gault makes way for our other monster kid ruckman, who really needs to be played with Grundy in the seniors as much as possible.

_________________
I am vengeance. I am the night. I am MagpieBat.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
John Wren Virgo

"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."


Joined: 15 Jul 2007


PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:27 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

do we go with a forward who can ruck a bit or a ruck who can play forward? i'm inclined to want us to retain gault and play witts when grundy needs to be managed.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Piesnchess 

piesnchess


Joined: 09 Jun 2008


PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:37 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I would not drop young Gault, he did very well. jesse White, though, may need to be looked at, just doesn't do enough yet, for mine.
_________________
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
swoop42 Virgo

Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?


Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Location: The 18

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:48 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

John Wren wrote:
do we go with a forward who can ruck a bit or a ruck who can play forward? i'm inclined to want us to retain gault and play witts when grundy needs to be managed.


Have Grundy and Witts improved enough so together they can dominate Bellchambers as the game progresses and give our mids more first opportunity around the stoppages?

Who has been playing as the relief ruck for Essendon, I've overlooked it?

_________________
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Woods Capricorn



Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Location: Melbourne

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 3:59 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Funny thing. I was just looking at the pregame thread on the Essendon board at BigFooty. There's plenty of discussion there, like here, about team selection and possible player match ups.

But in 11 pages there is not one mention of Varcoe and who should play on him. Seems he's slipped under their radar.

If Varcoe can harass like he did last game it will be a big help in preventing Essendon getting that early burst on the scoreboard that they like to achieve.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
John Wren Virgo

"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."


Joined: 15 Jul 2007


PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:02 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

swoop42 wrote:
John Wren wrote:
do we go with a forward who can ruck a bit or a ruck who can play forward? i'm inclined to want us to retain gault and play witts when grundy needs to be managed.


Have Grundy and Witts improved enough so together they can dominate Bellchambers as the game progresses and give our mids more first opportunity around the stoppages?

Who has been playing as the relief ruck for Essendon, I've overlooked it?


no one single player. they've shared it around.

_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Bob Sugar 



Joined: 11 Feb 2010
Location: Benalla

PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 8:06 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Great opportunity to debut Moore IMO, play him on Daniher and see how he goes, if he gets toweled up move him forward.

Forcast is for a absolute shit day weather wise.

_________________
Defender...........

On the day before the first, Daicos created God.

You like this.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Piesnchess 

piesnchess


Joined: 09 Jun 2008


PostPosted: Wed Apr 22, 2015 9:04 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Moore will play, lock it in folks.
_________________
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 7, 8, 9 ... 12, 13, 14  Next
Page 8 of 14   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group