Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Freedom of speech - only when you agree with the left

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
3.14159 Taurus



Joined: 12 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 12:33 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

think positive wrote:
3.14159 wrote:
...


I don't think you get this free speech thing Cool


It's a 3 speech think.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Wokko Pisces

Come and take it.


Joined: 04 Oct 2005


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 12:51 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

3.14159 wrote:
David wrote:
The question of whether "oppressive" speech should be censored is still a live one, as far as I'm concerned. As much as I think these protests were sinister and extraordinarily stupid, I think we'd be going down a very dangerous path if we did try to suppress them.


I beg to differ!
In England in 1936 it was protesters that halted Mosley's attempt to send England into alliance with Hitler's Germany.
Life isn't about siding pondering your navel while hateful thugs try and derail democracy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cable_Street

Censorship?
If you want to talk censorship and fear mongering you could worse than start with the Joseph McCarthy communist witch-hunts and black-listing of anyone even vaguely connected to anything Un-American!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Un-American_Activities_Committee


Except McCarthy wasn't involved with the Un-American activities commitee, he wasn't involved in exposing leftists in Hollywood and he was proven right in almost every case.

http://www.wnd.com/2000/02/4020/

At least read the links you post too:

from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Un-American_Activities_Committee

"The committee's anti-Communist investigations are often compared with those of Senator Joseph McCarthy. McCarthy, as a U.S. Senator, had no direct involvement with this House committee"
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 1:14 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Jezza wrote:
Nick - Pie Man wrote:
Oh for f-s sake. Socialist Alliance? Let me tell you about Socialist Alliance.

Fifteen years ago when I went to uni the first time around, SA were all over the place, promising revolutions and eating the babies of the rich and that sort of thing. You beauty! Bring it on! They held protests and said a lot of fine things about America, oil, Palestine, capitalists and every other thing that was responsible for all the ills of the world.

Fifteen years later, I'm back at uni. Guess what, SA are still at it with their fine rhetoric. Revolution this, America that. Blah blah fascism something something. What the actual f-. Where was the revolution they promised? Where was the stripping the assets of the rich man and moving him on with pockets empty?

Weak as piss, all talk, no balls. That's Socialist Alliance for you.

They prey on young kids who are, at best, idealistic idiots, filling their heads with meaningless rhetoric and garbage junk. Just like Islamic State, in fact. The only point of difference between the two organisations is that Islamic State have the testicular fortitude to do what they say they will do.

Your post is music to my ears! The Socialist Alliance/Alternative are a joke.


What NTPM didn't mention Jezza is that the Young Libs are far worse than SA Wink

Apart from the smell of dog shit on the bottom of my shoe that I dragged into the car, I can't think of anything worse than young libs. Hell, they're even more conservative than my cat & that's saying something.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Wokko Pisces

Come and take it.


Joined: 04 Oct 2005


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 1:20 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

The Young Liberals I saw on campus would sit quietly in their booth, hand out leaflets and stickers to people who came up to them and engage in polite discourse.

The SA would get in your face, shout at and abuse people, shove propaganda at you until you took it and yell at people who threw it away. They caused disruption to classes and property damage when something got their goat and caused lockdowns of campus with their antics.

The Young Libs might be boring, ultra coservative geeks, but thats the worst you can say about them.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
pietillidie 



Joined: 07 Jan 2005


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 1:35 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

^Not this fantasy again. Monied protectionists use public relations, hate groups, access to power, the threat of using economic leverage over people's liveswhat good are vocal street protests to them, particularly when they've managed to constrain protests so much through legislative control?

When it comes to the obvious, you pretend to be dumb. When it comes to nebulous macro constructs such as inflation and the group psychiatry of diverse cultures in other lands you will never visit, you pretend to be enlightened.

It's much like Stui's union obsession: Agreed; annoying, unlikable, interfering thugs, but they're the counter of monied protectionist thugs, so you either propose a grand bargain to de-escalate both, or you're just feigning concern with one party because it benefits you, either actually, or as imagined.

_________________
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Wokko Pisces

Come and take it.


Joined: 04 Oct 2005


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 3:46 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

If you begin a point by choosing to insult someone, even in an arrogant, passive aggressive way, then they wont pay any attention to anything else you write because they're either already angry and decided you're a dick or they dismiss you. Possibly both.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
pietillidie 



Joined: 07 Jan 2005


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 5:08 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

^There's nothing passive about it; it's active irritation! The fact is, this thread is repeating the same old stuff, despite people already knowing limits to speech exist, and that no one in their right mind would accept costly violation of the sort dished out to random Muslim folk unless they were living in fear. If the same were directed at middlish-class brown shoe wearers, there would be mobs tearing the place to bits in retaliation.

You also know the protesters on either side represent neither the mainstream left, nor the business and aspirational right. The unions and working left are more prone to racist talk than the business right (hence the racist kowtowing from the ALP), so these are just old culture war generalisationsrehashed without boredom, apparently.

And surely, for the 129th time, it's pretty obvious why the Glibs, young or otherwise, have a different political modus operandi than the fringe and even organised labour. Yet you make such a glib observation without even a hint of irony, as if you're disappointed at the naughty kids in the class for not tucking their shirts in and reciting the 23rd Psalm. I mean, seriously; do you think political negotiation ought to be a case of Oliver Twist asking for more from Fagin? Because without counter-weight to power incumbency of some kind, that's exactly what it would be like.

Just because I like mixing with people doesn't mean I like reading the same old political stuff and playing the same old ping pong without advancement. The last whatever period of incessant proclamations about Muslims by people who don't know a single Muslimlet alone a single Muslim group, as if they've spent half their lives living in Turkmenistanhas been a pathetic low-point of conversation. We might as well go back to discussing the cranial shapes of the unsaved in the colonies.

True, I have to take my share of the blame for not introducing new ideas and simply playing ping pong. That much I accept.

Ever sat up for hours scouring the web on your tablet or phone hoping to find new and interesting ideas? Welcome to my last couple of months. In my defense, the brain-eating racist zombie virus is significantly to blame for the decline in quality of mainstream output society-wideand you can't say folks weren't warned that's what happens when the virus takes over.

_________________
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 8:41 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Wokko wrote:
The Young Liberals I saw on campus would sit quietly in their booth, hand out leaflets and stickers to people who came up to them and engage in polite discourse.

The SA would get in your face, shout at and abuse people, shove propaganda at you until you took it and yell at people who threw it away. They caused disruption to classes and property damage when something got their goat and caused lockdowns of campus with their antics.

The Young Libs might be boring, ultra coservative geeks, but thats the worst you can say about them.


When I first went to Uni the Libs were basically underground (LaTrobe - mid 1970's)
When I went back they were much bigger at Melbourne Uni.
Now My youngest tells me there are 2 political groups that are in your face & basically similar in their capacity to piss most people of most of the time & they are the young Lbs & SA.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Nick - Pie Man 



Joined: 04 Aug 2010


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:53 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

watt price tully wrote:

What NTPM didn't mention Jezza is that the Young Libs are far worse than SA Wink

Apart from the smell of dog shit on the bottom of my shoe that I dragged into the car, I can't think of anything worse than young libs. Hell, they're even more conservative than my cat & that's saying something.


This is very true. Young Labor too (I've done hard time with both groups). There are many groups I could name that are full of young people and (coincidentally I'm sure) full of wankers too. The fact that I went off at SA in particular doesn't mean that there aren't other groups equally worthy of derision.

The young libs are smug assholes. SA are rude assholes. Match made in heaven.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 1:42 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Perhaps we should just agree that a certain degree of narcissism and obnoxiousness are necessary conditions for getting involved in student politics of any sort.

Did anyone read that article about the National Union of Students I posted a few days ago? Jesus Christ, it was like reading Lord of the Flies.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
nomadjack 



Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Location: Essendon

PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:18 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Student politics these days is a complete cesspit (has it ever been any different?) which is reflected in the fact that about 5% of students bother to vote. It's made up of fundamentalist socialist wanks, rightwing ALP wannabees, and smug, smarmy young lib arseholes. Groups like SA are embarrassingly earnest and naive in equal measure while both mainstream parties are notorious for dirty politics and graft. It's kindergarten politics at its worst.

As far as the Reclaim Australia rally and those attempting to disrupt it goes, give me a break on the free speech angle please Rolling Eyes

Hate speech has never been free and you are kidding yourself if you believe there is anything else but sinister motives behind those organising the rallies. I've been tracking the emergence of these kinds of movements and groups in Australia and overseas for decades. They are far from new and their game is about furthering their own political goals by preying on and amplifying the base fears of difference that many people in society hold. If you scratch the surface you'll find many of the same names and faces involved since the 1970s and 1980s, with the cause celeb moving from Jews to Asian refugees to immigration in general, to African immigration and now to Islam.

I'm all for the free exchange of ideas and debate on the merits of immigration and how modern Islam (whatever that is) might fit with Australian values (whatever they are) but since when has blatant bigotry had a legitimate place in rational debate?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 7:40 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
Perhaps we should just agree that a certain degree of narcissism and obnoxiousness are necessary conditions for getting involved in student politics of any sort.

Did anyone read that article about the National Union of Students I posted a few days ago? Jesus Christ, it was like reading Lord of the Flies.


If you really want to have some fun, look back on some of the names involved when the Melbourne Uni student union went belly up, then look up some of those names and track where they've been and what they've been doing since.

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 7:53 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Some extensive film footage of the event has been located: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktmNEWwH69s

Note the ineffective and inarticulate members of Socialist Action being kept at bay by the police. The resolution of the confrontation is, of course, a reasonably straight-forward one.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 8:15 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Pies4shaw wrote:
Some extensive film footage of the event has been located: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktmNEWwH69s

Note the ineffective and inarticulate members of Socialist Action being kept at bay by the police. The resolution of the confrontation is, of course, a reasonably straight-forward one.


Laughing Laughing with a hint of John Lee Hooker. I like it.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Wokko Pisces

Come and take it.


Joined: 04 Oct 2005


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 8:49 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

nomadjack wrote:
Student politics these days is a complete cesspit (has it ever been any different?) which is reflected in the fact that about 5% of students bother to vote. It's made up of fundamentalist socialist wanks, rightwing ALP wannabees, and smug, smarmy young lib arseholes. Groups like SA are embarrassingly earnest and naive in equal measure while both mainstream parties are notorious for dirty politics and graft. It's kindergarten politics at its worst.

As far as the Reclaim Australia rally and those attempting to disrupt it goes, give me a break on the free speech angle please Rolling Eyes

Hate speech has never been free and you are kidding yourself if you believe there is anything else but sinister motives behind those organising the rallies. I've been tracking the emergence of these kinds of movements and groups in Australia and overseas for decades. They are far from new and their game is about furthering their own political goals by preying on and amplifying the base fears of difference that many people in society hold. If you scratch the surface you'll find many of the same names and faces involved since the 1970s and 1980s, with the cause celeb moving from Jews to Asian refugees to immigration in general, to African immigration and now to Islam.

I'm all for the free exchange of ideas and debate on the merits of immigration and how modern Islam (whatever that is) might fit with Australian values (whatever they are) but since when has blatant bigotry had a legitimate place in rational debate?


So who is it deciding what is unlawful speech? Who is it who decided what is too bigoted or racist or hateful to say? Because in every era there are people willing to silence their critics and it is far better to have all speech be free than risk censorious regimes and groups from silencing dissent.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 7 of 9   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group