Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Freedom of speech - only when you agree with the left

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 8:18 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Perzactly, HAL
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 8:22 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Enough about me, let's talk about the Pies.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 9:04 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

stui magpie wrote:
Wokko wrote:
Pies4shaw wrote:
Your entire argument is predicated upon a misunderstanding. This bunch of folks didn't have an "opinion" they wanted to share, they had a prejudice they wanted to indulge. Stopping them from doing so isn't "censorship", it's pest control.


Gentlemen! I give you exhibit A.

The prosecution rests Your Honour.


I flagged the same principle with a leftie Muso I know. His response? "Attempted censorship of hate speech? Fine with me"

No argument from me, just don't try to claim high moral ground on the subject in the future.


Random leftie musician doesn't speak for me, or necessarily for anyone else.

I get that there are views like that out there, but we all agreed on that at the beginning. It doesn't mean that all or even most left-wing people have a lack of commitment to freedom of expression. Some do, some don't.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 9:09 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
stui magpie wrote:
Wokko wrote:
Pies4shaw wrote:
Your entire argument is predicated upon a misunderstanding. This bunch of folks didn't have an "opinion" they wanted to share, they had a prejudice they wanted to indulge. Stopping them from doing so isn't "censorship", it's pest control.


Gentlemen! I give you exhibit A.

The prosecution rests Your Honour.


I flagged the same principle with a leftie Muso I know. His response? "Attempted censorship of hate speech? Fine with me"

No argument from me, just don't try to claim high moral ground on the subject in the future.


Random leftie musician doesn't speak for me, or necessarily for anyone else.

I get that there are views like that out there, but we all agreed on that at the beginning. It doesn't mean that all or even most left-wing people have a lack of commitment to freedom of expression. Some do, some don't.


I didn't say he spoke for you, neither obviously does Pies4shaw.

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Nick - Pie Man 



Joined: 04 Aug 2010


PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 9:24 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh for f-s sake. Socialist Alliance? Let me tell you about Socialist Alliance.

Fifteen years ago when I went to uni the first time around, SA were all over the place, promising revolutions and eating the babies of the rich and that sort of thing. You beauty! Bring it on! They held protests and said a lot of fine things about America, oil, Palestine, capitalists and every other thing that was responsible for all the ills of the world.

Fifteen years later, I'm back at uni. Guess what, SA are still at it with their fine rhetoric. Revolution this, America that. Blah blah fascism something something. What the actual f-. Where was the revolution they promised? Where was the stripping the assets of the rich man and moving him on with pockets empty?

Weak as piss, all talk, no balls. That's Socialist Alliance for you.

They prey on young kids who are, at best, idealistic idiots, filling their heads with meaningless rhetoric and garbage junk. Just like Islamic State, in fact. The only point of difference between the two organisations is that Islamic State have the testicular fortitude to do what they say they will do.

SA are just windbags.

In terms of comparing them to IS, I'm not sure that's a bad thing. But in every other respect, it is. They are stupid little children, gutless, cowards. All hat, no cattle.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Nick - Pie Man 



Joined: 04 Aug 2010


PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 9:25 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

They had fifteen f-ng years to deliver on their promises and they failed. Shame on you, Socialist Alliance.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:29 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

So, you and SA have some things in common then? Razz Wink
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:43 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick - Pie Man wrote:
Oh for f-s sake. Socialist Alliance? Let me tell you about Socialist Alliance.

Fifteen years ago when I went to uni the first time around, SA were all over the place, promising revolutions and eating the babies of the rich and that sort of thing. You beauty! Bring it on! They held protests and said a lot of fine things about America, oil, Palestine, capitalists and every other thing that was responsible for all the ills of the world.

Fifteen years later, I'm back at uni. Guess what, SA are still at it with their fine rhetoric. Revolution this, America that. Blah blah fascism something something. What the actual f-. Where was the revolution they promised? Where was the stripping the assets of the rich man and moving him on with pockets empty?

Weak as piss, all talk, no balls. That's Socialist Alliance for you.

They prey on young kids who are, at best, idealistic idiots, filling their heads with meaningless rhetoric and garbage junk. Just like Islamic State, in fact. The only point of difference between the two organisations is that Islamic State have the testicular fortitude to do what they say they will do.

Your post is music to my ears! The Socialist Alliance/Alternative are a joke.

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |


Last edited by Jezza on Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:48 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick, I think you'll find it's Socialist Alternative on most uni campuses. My understanding is that the Socialist Alliance are a different (older age demographic, more pro-China/USSR/Cuba) group that, unlike the Alternatives, tend to run in state, federal and council elections. The two organisations generally have stalls set up around the city in roughly equal numbers.

Now, as for the People's Front of Judea...

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
pietillidie 



Joined: 07 Jan 2005


PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:54 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Is the American Fundamentalist Free Speech Cult still seeing demons, or have sane folk finally moved in to demythologise the religion for the 28th time this year?
_________________
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
3.14159 Taurus



Joined: 12 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 12:07 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

...

Last edited by 3.14159 on Thu Apr 09, 2015 12:13 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 12:11 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem here isn't an overly fundamentalist defence of the free speech principle, IMHO—it's an elementary misunderstanding of it.

The question of whether "oppressive" speech should be censored is still a live one, as far as I'm concerned. As much as I think these protests were sinister and extraordinarily stupid, I think we'd be going down a very dangerous path if we did try to suppress them.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 12:26 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

3.14159 wrote:
...


I don't think you get this free speech thing Cool

_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
pietillidie 



Joined: 07 Jan 2005


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 12:26 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
The problem here isn't an overly fundamentalist defence of the free speech principle, IMHO—it's an elementary misunderstanding of it.

The question of whether "oppressive" speech should be censored is still a live one, as far as I'm concerned. As much as I think these protests were sinister and extraordinarily stupid, I think we'd be going down a very dangerous path if we did try to suppress them.

Even the thread title bears no relationship to the specifics of the original incident, so of course it has the same old nonsense in mind: It's okay for monied protectionists to have more speech by purchasing access to powerful decision makers and the attention of the populous, and stifling other people's critical speech with both tacit and overt legal and economic threat, but it's not okay for the unmonied and unwashed to interrupt violent, stress-causing, hate-amplifying rabid speech that wins elections for monied protectionists.

I am no fan of either group for different reasons, but that's irrelevant to the sociological reality of "speech" as actually sanctioned. The incident itself was about the angry disenfranchised on both sides finding release.

_________________
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm


Last edited by pietillidie on Thu Apr 09, 2015 12:31 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
3.14159 Taurus



Joined: 12 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Thu Apr 09, 2015 12:30 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
The question of whether "oppressive" speech should be censored is still a live one, as far as I'm concerned. As much as I think these protests were sinister and extraordinarily stupid, I think we'd be going down a very dangerous path if we did try to suppress them.


I beg to differ!
In England in 1936 it was protesters that halted Mosley's attempt to send England into alliance with Hitler's Germany.
Life isn't about siding pondering your navel while hateful thugs try and derail democracy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cable_Street

Censorship?
If you want to talk censorship and fear mongering you could worse than start with the Joseph McCarthy communist witch-hunts and black-listing of anyone even vaguely connected to anything Un-American!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Un-American_Activities_Committee


Last edited by 3.14159 on Thu Apr 09, 2015 12:42 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 6 of 9   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group