Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Freedom of speech - only when you agree with the left

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 8:43 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, to actual human beings, they do.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Skids Cancer

Quitting drinking will be one of the best choices you make in your life.


Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Location: Joined 3/6/02 . Member #175

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 8:54 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Topic title is spot on.
_________________
Don't count the days, make the days count.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:18 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Wokko wrote:
Those on the right who are for free speech (Libertarians/Anarcho-Capitalists) are for free speech without reservation and those against it (Nationalists/Neo-Conservatives) are not against 'free speech' per se but have hang ups about patriotism/security in much the same way as the liberal left and their 'hate speech'.


So, you've listed four different kinds of right-wingers with varying views of freedom of speech but continue to sweep everyone else into a homogenous group called "the left". Can you at least acknowledge that there's a range of differing opinions held by anarchists, left-liberals, left-libertarians, social democrats, environmentalists, Trotskyite socialists and old school Stalinists, and that views on freedom of expression and censorship vary accordingly?

Ayn Rand didn't invent freedom of speech, you know. It's a right that's been fought for by disadvantaged groups, progressives, reformers and socialists for centuries against right-wing authoritarianism, a fight that's continued today by mostly left-wing groups like the ACLU in America and progressive civil libertarians here and elsewhere. Seeing it as a purely right-wing concern is fantastical thinking.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:24 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/rsl-fury-over-sickening-flag-burning-at-reclaim-australia-protests/story-fni0cx12-1227292409151

Well, I'm glad they found something to be outraged about here.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2015 11:58 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

watt price tully wrote:
Personally, I think that people who believe that Halal leads to sharia leads to funding terrorists should be jailed; not for their views but for their ignorance in holding those views in the first place!!(alarmist nonsense) We need to expose such stupidity

At the same time, religious extremism & killers, that is conspicuous in the form of fundamentalist Islam needs to be monitored & surveilled. That is quite a right & proper thing to do.

I'm not sure if you're serious or not but if you are then no they shouldn't be jailed. Because you think their opinions are 'stupid' does not give you any right or encourage others to jail people for such opinions. The best way to disagree with these people is to form your own opinions and justify why your viewpoint is correct in contrast to them.

Your spot on with your second point about fundamentalist Islam needing to be monitored and surveilled.

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:09 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Jezza wrote:
watt price tully wrote:
Personally, I think that people who believe that Halal leads to sharia leads to funding terrorists should be jailed; not for their views but for their ignorance in holding those views in the first place!!(alarmist nonsense) We need to expose such stupidity

At the same time, religious extremism & killers, that is conspicuous in the form of fundamentalist Islam needs to be monitored & surveilled. That is quite a right & proper thing to do.

I'm not sure if you're serious or not but if you are then no they shouldn't be jailed. Because you think their opinions are 'stupid' does not give you any right or encourage others to jail people for such opinions. The best way to disagree with these people is to form your own opinions and justify why your viewpoint is correct in contrast to them.

Your spot on with your second point about fundamentalist Islam needing to be monitored and surveilled.


Right, you're next. jail now. Wink

Nah, just frustration at such obvious stupidity such as Obama is a secret Muslim coz I saw it on youtube. Same shit different day.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:11 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

watt price tully wrote:
Jezza wrote:
watt price tully wrote:
Personally, I think that people who believe that Halal leads to sharia leads to funding terrorists should be jailed; not for their views but for their ignorance in holding those views in the first place!!(alarmist nonsense) We need to expose such stupidity

At the same time, religious extremism & killers, that is conspicuous in the form of fundamentalist Islam needs to be monitored & surveilled. That is quite a right & proper thing to do.

I'm not sure if you're serious or not but if you are then no they shouldn't be jailed. Because you think their opinions are 'stupid' does not give you any right or encourage others to jail people for such opinions. The best way to disagree with these people is to form your own opinions and justify why your viewpoint is correct in contrast to them.

Your spot on with your second point about fundamentalist Islam needing to be monitored and surveilled.


Right, you're next. jail now. Wink

Nah, just frustration at such obvious stupidity such as Obama is a secret Muslim coz I saw it on youtube. Same shit different day.

LOL hopefully the sentence isn't lengthy Laughing

Thanks for clarifying mate.

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 12:19 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Skids wrote:
Topic title is spot on.


Nah Skids, it applies to both sides if you want to split things into the left & right. It would be far truer to say that some elements of the left & some elements of the right would like to ban free speech. When you face such sweeping generalizations like the title then you know it to be wrong. That should be pretty self evident.

It's like saying all religious people are nutters when we know that actually not all are Razz Wink

Mind you I did try to become a right wing moral majority Southern Baptist once till I realized they didn't hold under long enough Wink

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
pietillidie 



Joined: 07 Jan 2005


PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:52 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Fringe posturing all 'round, surely?

Once again, of course, the Muslim family down the road wears the only serious insult concerned.

_________________
In the end the rain comes down, washes clean the streets of a blue sky town.
Help Nick's: http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/fundraising.htm
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 1:05 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

watt price tully wrote:
Jezza wrote:
watt price tully wrote:
Personally, I think that people who believe that Halal leads to sharia leads to funding terrorists should be jailed; not for their views but for their ignorance in holding those views in the first place!!(alarmist nonsense) We need to expose such stupidity

At the same time, religious extremism & killers, that is conspicuous in the form of fundamentalist Islam needs to be monitored & surveilled. That is quite a right & proper thing to do.

I'm not sure if you're serious or not but if you are then no they shouldn't be jailed. Because you think their opinions are 'stupid' does not give you any right or encourage others to jail people for such opinions. The best way to disagree with these people is to form your own opinions and justify why your viewpoint is correct in contrast to them.

Your spot on with your second point about fundamentalist Islam needing to be monitored and surveilled.


Right, you're next. jail now. Wink

Nah, just frustration at such obvious stupidity such as Obama is a secret Muslim coz I saw it on youtube. Same shit different day.


You're right about the stupidity, there's actually a growing intolerance that I'm finding disturbing. Comments that I see and hear from people (usually young) who I don't consider to be stupid or racist, yet the disparaging remarks about muslims and/or Asians are both.

Actions like these "counter protests" are actually counter productive yet the zealous petals who participate are utterly oblivious to their own hypocrisy.

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:36 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

How and when do you think we should respond to that ignorance, then? Because as far as I can tell, these sentiments are only growing, and if the debates on here are indicative of anything, people have no interest in listening to reason.

If you don't support counter-protests, what else do you suggest? How can we show the "Reclaim Australia" protestors that they don't speak for us, and how do we show Australian Muslims that they're not on their own?

As much as I share your displeasure with some of the tactics used by protestors on the weekend, I would imagine that many Muslims took heart from seeing non-Muslim Australians stand up for them.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace


Last edited by David on Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:41 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 2:40 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the information. They do their own thing.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 3:01 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
How and when do you think we should respond to that ignorance, then? Because as far as I can tell, these sentiments are only growing, and if the debates on here are indicative of anything, people have no interest in listening to reason.

If you don't support counter-protests, what else do you suggest? How can we show the "Reclaim Australia" protestors that they don't speak for us, and how do we show Australian Muslims that they're not on their own?

As much as I share your displeasure with some of the tactics used by protestors on the weekend, I would imagine that many Muslims took heart from seeing non-Muslim Australians stand up for them.


People have interest in listening to reason, they no interest in having views shoved down their throat. I'd argue that while your motives are good in defending the average muslim person, the manner you often do it is what elicits the kind of response that you really don't want.

" How can we show the "Reclaim Australia" protestors that they don't speak for us"? Good question. Do you need to? How do I show the Occupy protestors they didn't speak for me? The G20 protestors??

Leaving aside for a minute my observation of the counter protest being designed deliberately to disrupt, there are plenty of positive things that can be done.

Firstly, my suggestion is stay away from the reclaim Australia mob if they want to rally, don't give their cause oxygen or publicity. If you want to show muslims that those nutters aren't the majority, stage a positive rally rather than a protest one. March in support of something instead of against something, make it a positive event on a separate day.

I doubt very much that many muslims took anything positive from the events, the overly combatative and overzealous counter protesters were much more interested in seems in picking a blue with the reclaim australia nuffies than in sending out any positive message.

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 6:18 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
How and when do you think we should respond to that ignorance, then?....


1. Re-education camps;
2. Disenfranchisement - if you're that thick then you lose the privilege to vote;
3. Get Port Arthur back to it's original purpose & translocate;
4. Be locked up with Miranda Divine reading you lullabies for the term of your natural life;
5. Be forced to eat Gina Rineharts iron ore; and,
6. Go to a vegan restaurant with Clive Palmer

Not that hard really.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dave The Man Scorpio



Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2015 6:29 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

3.14159 wrote:
One step beyond...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yaChekWmuY


Lucky I did not go up that way after the VFL Game on Saturday

_________________
I am Da Man
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Warnings : 1 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 4 of 9   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group