Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
A Close look

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:41 pm
Post subject: A Close lookReply with quote

Watching half the VFL game on TV yesterday I was mightily impressed by our full forward, Close, who is a great mark, very mobile, a smart footballer and is 199 cms. He's already 23 yrs and apparently works at our club in some capacity. Given our terrible shortage of decent forwards I wondered if we might look at drafting or at least rookieing this kid.

I'm absolutely sick of the same looking forward line of ours, dished up year in year out built around a fast declining Cloke. I'd be trading Cloke now and build a new forward line around Moore, Abbott, Cox and maybe a mobile tall like Close.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
thompsoc 



Joined: 21 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:46 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes Yes Yes!!!!!
I have said in a few other posts that I liked the look of him.
199 cm and 23 years of age and he works for Collingwood!
Reminded me of Darcy Moore.
Great leap and a good contested mark.
Keep a rookie spot warm please!

_________________
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MightyMagpie 



Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA

PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:50 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Michael Still (194cm I think) is another one who was doing well in VFL before injury.

Close has had some decent hauls (I haven't seen him play), but the 88kg listing suggests he might be a bit underweight for a KPF. He may have put on weight this season.

I asked MagpieBat about these two's draft prospects a few weeks back and he suggested that there was likely to be some interest from other club's and possibly Collingwood.

_________________
All We Can Be
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:52 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Get a grip, RB. You don't plan a forward line around a child who has played one good game, two rookies who have never played senior football and may never be up to it and a guy that you think might be able to be a key forward, even though he hsn't yet even made it onto a senior list. Cox, eg, kicked 5 goals yesterday - but they were the 18th through 22nd goals of a game the side won by 12.

Also, just stop bagging Cloke. Losing 23 goals to 7 is not the KPF's fault. We're all frustrated by his kicking but until we find someone else who can play the position, we can't just let him go (unless, of course, we enjoy watching the team beaten by 15 goals most weeks).
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dave The Man Scorpio



Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia

PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 4:11 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

MightyMagpie wrote:
Michael Still (194cm I think) is another one who was doing well in VFL before injury.

Close has had some decent hauls (I haven't seen him play), but the 88kg listing suggests he might be a bit underweight for a KPF. He may have put on weight this season.

I asked MagpieBat about these two's draft prospects a few weeks back and he suggested that there was likely to be some interest from other club's and possibly Collingwood.


Agree the 88kg for Close is a Worry but He just been Playing Local Footy up to this year. At 23 is here much Development in his Body Left?

Funny how Still’s Injury Forced Moore Forward and That worked out very well Very Happy

I reckon Both be good Rookie Picks and Forwards is something we lack depth in

_________________
I am Da Man
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Warnings : 1 
thompsoc 



Joined: 21 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 4:15 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Send him to KFC ( kids fattening centre ) to get some more weight on him.
_________________
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MightyMagpie 



Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA

PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 4:18 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

thompsoc wrote:
Send him to KFC ( kids fattening centre ) to get some more weight on him.


He can just room with Swanny ...

_________________
All We Can Be
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
qldmagpie67 



Joined: 18 Dec 2008


PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 4:59 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been thinking about forward lines recently and now disjunction all ours is.
Are we missing the new style of forward lines ?
Hybrid style with 1 tall + a resting ruckman at times 2 mid range mobile types 2 small goal sneaks who are great crumbers and readers of the ball off packs.
Look at Hawks Bulldogs Tigers for instance they seem to have this system down pat.
Is our structure to regimental and same ole ?
How would a forward line of Moore, Grundy/Cox, Langdon, Elliott, DeGoey, Pendles do ?
If we pick up Aish & Treloar we have the luxury of using Pendles more forward and he can still hit the mid field giving others a break along with DeGoey. For mine Elliott should be a forward only not a mid as well.
Langdon is a elite reader of play and a very good mark and better than average kick (in our team)
Grundy has shown he has decent hands and he could play forward better than Witts and Cox has shown he can kick goals in the seconds.

Play Cloke on a wing aka Richo style with a never enter the forward 50 edict. Use his booming boot to get the ball deep and quick.
I've also noted how many clubs rotate more players through there forward line. Ours other than a resting mid never changes.

Interested in other views
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
thompsoc 



Joined: 21 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 5:09 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Langdon is a poor kick and is slow to get
ball to foot.
Grundy so far has been a failure in the forward line.
And he doesn't take a pack mark.
If you watch Cox in the VFL you will see his forward work
is superior to Grundy already.
Watch how Cox leads compared to Grundy.
But you are right something needs to happen
big time in our forward line.
But you also forgot the Hobbit!

_________________
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MightyMagpie 



Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Location: WA

PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 5:11 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

qldmagpie67 wrote:
I've been thinking about forward lines recently and now disjunction all ours is.
Are we missing the new style of forward lines ?
Hybrid style with 1 tall + a resting ruckman at times 2 mid range mobile types 2 small goal sneaks who are great crumbers and readers of the ball off packs.
Look at Hawks Bulldogs Tigers for instance they seem to have this system down pat.
Is our structure to regimental and same ole ?
How would a forward line of Moore, Grundy/Cox, Langdon, Elliott, DeGoey, Pendles do ?
If we pick up Aish & Treloar we have the luxury of using Pendles more forward and he can still hit the mid field giving others a break along with DeGoey. For mine Elliott should be a forward only not a mid as well.
Langdon is a elite reader of play and a very good mark and better than average kick (in our team)
Grundy has shown he has decent hands and he could play forward better than Witts and Cox has shown he can kick goals in the seconds.

Play Cloke on a wing aka Richo style with a never enter the forward 50 edict. Use his booming boot to get the ball deep and quick.
I've also noted how many clubs rotate more players through there forward line. Ours other than a resting mid never changes.

Interested in other views


Our resting rucks just haven't looked good forward. Moore is the only one who has shown much and he is raw. Too hard to assess Cox yet.

If sub rule goes then ruck strategies (and forward setups) may change.

I agree Cloke looks best playing up the ground and providing the let out target from defence and long quick kick inside 50, but I see him doing this from CHF rather than a wing.

At the risk of being lampooned, Goldsack and Blair both rate as two of the better forward pressure players in the competition and I see a role for them (Goldsack and Reid can swap as needed between forward and defence to mix things up).

What we miss is one or two elite finishers to get reward for the grunt work - as I've suggested elsewhere, Bennell and Stevie J would be my targets.

Elliott, Fasolo (inconsistent), DeGoey and Broomhead all have the potential to be above average in forward roles. Swan is bound to spend more time forward as he ages.

Some of the HBF types will need to be tried forward at some stage to get a game - Langdon as you suggest (midfield has been suggested previously) and the one I like (if we keep him) is Oxley who can mark and kick long.

_________________
All We Can Be
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
thompsoc 



Joined: 21 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 5:13 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Grundy 17 games for 7 goals at 0.4 rate in 2015.
Worse than the Hobbit.

_________________
we don't eat our own at collingwood we just allow them to foul our nest.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dangles 

Balmey Army


Joined: 14 May 2015


PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 11:59 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The three tall forwards is something we need to move on from. We've been doing it forever. Time for a rejig.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
AN_Inkling 



Joined: 06 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 12:53 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

The idea of moving Cloke on isn't completely crazy (though not far from, he is one of the better KPFs in the comp and they are extremely difficult to come by. Just look at the difficulty we've had in replacing Leigh Brown!). But building a forward line around a teenager (Moore), two players who will likely never make it at AFL level (Close, Abbott) and an American ruckman, is one of the craziest suggestions I've seen in a while, so kudos for being imaginative.

I thought you were of the opinion that we are not far from competing? A change like this would set us back 3-4 years, given you did not even suggest trading in a quality tall to replace Cloke. Building a spine is the longest and most difficult part of a rebuild. We have one in place if Reid can keep fit and we're not about to throw it away.

_________________
Well done boys!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Page 1 of 1   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group