| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| John Wren wrote: | | roar wrote: | | inxs88 wrote: | | one short on the bench |
Crisp can be the sub. |
| RudeBoy wrote: | | IC: Adams, Crisp, Freeman, Crisp (sub) |
so, which is it? |
I've edited my post and dropped one of the Crisp twins, to make way for Broomhead.  |
|
|
|
 |
Pies4shaw 
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| ^^^ Rats, I guess that means that I'm not allowed to have a centre-line of Swan, Swan and Swan. |
|
|
|
|
Bay Pie
Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Location: QLD
|
| Post subject: | |
|
B: M.Williams J.Frost B.Sinclair
HB: T.Langdon N.Brown A. Toovey
C: S. Sidebottom D.Swan T.Varcoe
HF: J.Elliott J. White T. Goldsack
F: A.Fasolo T. Cloke C.Gault
F: Grundy S. Pendlebury T. Adams
ICH: Broomhead Crisp Blair Kennedy
_________________
Go Pies |
|
|
|
|
John Wren 
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Bay Pie wrote: | B: M.Williams J.Frost B.Sinclair
HB: T.Langdon N.Brown A. Toovey
C: S. Sidebottom D.Swan T.Varcoe
HF: J.Elliott J. White T. Goldsack
F: A.Fasolo T. Cloke C.Gault
F: Grundy S. Pendlebury T. Adams
ICH: Broomhead Crisp Blair Kennedy |
i'd have varcoe on the bench for the back rotations. crisp or broomhead/kennedy to start. one of broomhead or kennedy to be sub.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
toovmeister
Joined: 21 Sep 2010
|
| Post subject: | |
|
B: williams brown toovey
HB: langdon frost oxley
C: sidebottom swan crisp
HF: fasolo cloke blair
F: elliott white goldsack
R: grundy pendlebury adams
Int: thomas dwyer varcoe gault
close - kennedy broomhead sinclair de goey ramsay karnezis |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
i don't get how so many think sinclair is not a lock for round 1. i'll go he if he is not named for round 1, notwithstanding injury.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
leonmagic 
Joined: 16 Aug 2004
|
| Post subject: | |
|
a forward line consisting of cloke, gault, karnezis, fasolo and elliot is needed if we're any chance to kick a winning score.
completely aware it was only a practice match, but i just don't have a lot of optimism towards round 1 (and further). every year it seems other clubs bring in class and excitement (cockatoo, garlett etc) and we just bring it averageness after averageness. no spark at all in this side. |
|
|
|
|
Bay Pie
Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Location: QLD
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| John Wren wrote: | | Bay Pie wrote: | B: M.Williams J.Frost B.Sinclair
HB: T.Langdon N.Brown A. Toovey
C: S. Sidebottom D.Swan T.Varcoe
HF: J.Elliott J. White T. Goldsack
F: A.Fasolo T. Cloke C.Gault
F: Grundy S. Pendlebury T. Adams
ICH: Broomhead Crisp Blair Kennedy |
i'd have varcoe on the bench for the back rotations. crisp or broomhead/kennedy to start. one of broomhead or kennedy to be sub. |
I actually forgot about Oxley. I think he'll play round 1. Broomhead or Kennedy to miss. The other will be the sub.
_________________
Go Pies |
|
|
|
|
roar
Joined: 01 Sep 2004
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| John Wren wrote: | | i don't get how so many think sinclair is not a lock for round 1. i'll go he if he is not named for round 1, notwithstanding injury. |
He probably is a lock. As is Blair, but I posted the line up I want to see.
_________________
kill for collingwood! |
|
|
|
|
3rd degree 
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Location: John Wren's tote
|
| Post subject: | |
|
B: M.Williams J.Frost B.Sinclair
HB: T.Langdon N.Brown A. Toovey
C: S. Sidebottom D.Swan T.Varcoe
HF: J.Elliott T Cloke T. Goldsack
F: A.Fasolo J.White C.Gault
F: Grundy S. Pendlebury T. Adams
ICH: Karnesis, Crisp ,Blair, De Goey
sub: Blair
Broom Head out for mine due to form.
Kennedy stiff to miss but he is too small and De Goey is one of our only good kicks.
_________________
" Ohhh Banksy and out comes the Note Book".
www.facebook/the hybernators |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| roar wrote: | | John Wren wrote: | | i don't get how so many think sinclair is not a lock for round 1. i'll go he if he is not named for round 1, notwithstanding injury. |
He probably is a lock. As is Blair, but I posted the line up I want to see. |
yeah, i think many posters are putting up teams they'd like to see rather than what is likely to occur.
as i've said previously, i think the team should be an online member vote. and, at the end of the season we get to vote players off the island.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
Lazza
Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| John Wren wrote: | | roar wrote: | | John Wren wrote: | | i don't get how so many think sinclair is not a lock for round 1. i'll go he if he is not named for round 1, notwithstanding injury. |
He probably is a lock. As is Blair, but I posted the line up I want to see. |
yeah, i think many posters are putting up teams they'd like to see rather than what is likely to occur.
as i've said previously, i think the team should be an online member vote. and, at the end of the season we get to vote players off the island. |
Bloody hell JW, a few like Armstrong, Young and Blair will be voted off well before the end of the season!
_________________
Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine! |
|
|
|
|
3rd degree
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Location: John Wren's tote
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Lazza wrote: | | John Wren wrote: | | roar wrote: | | John Wren wrote: | | i don't get how so many think sinclair is not a lock for round 1. i'll go he if he is not named for round 1, notwithstanding injury. |
He probably is a lock. As is Blair, but I posted the line up I want to see. |
yeah, i think many posters are putting up teams they'd like to see rather than what is likely to occur.
as i've said previously, i think the team should be an online member vote. and, at the end of the season we get to vote players off the island. |
Bloody hell JW, a few like Armstrong, Young and Blair will be voted off well before the end of the season! |
Yeah Rude Boy is a massive Clinton Young Fan!
_________________
" Ohhh Banksy and out comes the Note Book".
www.facebook/the hybernators |
|
|
|
|
toovmeister
Joined: 21 Sep 2010
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| the plan was to play a team in week 3 of the nab challenge as close as possible to that which we will field in rnd 1. greenwood injury may affect that to some degree with another midfielder maybe coming into the squad - but otherwise, despite the poor effort v the dogs, i would expect the rnd 1 side to very closely resemble what we put onto etihad last sat night. there is not much love for oxley or ramsay so far in the 22's i've seen posted - both have been more than serviceable in the pre season, both played last saturday, and at least 1 or possibly even both will play in rnd 1 |
|
|
|
|
gurugeoff
Joined: 09 Oct 2013
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| John Wren wrote: | | i don't get how so many think sinclair is not a lock for round 1. i'll go he if he is not named for round 1, notwithstanding injury. |
did i miss something? Sinclair was a small forward with poor disposal, who i think became a 'defensive' forward [aka not kicking goals], who then showed a little bit at half back before being continually injured.
So, i don't think he has put together an amazing body of work in the back line that he should be considered a lock in at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
