Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Moderation of Gina Rinehart thread in VPT

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Feedback
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 10:46 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

David wrote:
No, I would have done exactly the same if Stui or Morrigu or Swoop or anyone else had posted it. I'm not 'out to get' 1061 and I'm not using other posters to do that or any of the other rubbish you're accusing me of. If her posts warrant removal, they'll be removed with no further consequences for anyone else, just like anybody else's would be.

In this case, your thread title was inappropriate and was edited accordingly. Can we move on?


I'm not saying you're out to get 1061., She does serve up stuff for you to moderate on. You simply misapplied this because you can't escape your literalism. Literalism doesn't allow for irony.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmiH7pD3-Zs

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman


Last edited by watt price tully on Mon Feb 16, 2015 10:51 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
1061 



Joined: 06 Sep 2013


PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 10:48 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

If it walks like a duck, quack waddle quack waddle quack waddle!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 10:56 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

watt price tully wrote:
David wrote:
No, I would have done exactly the same if Stui or Morrigu or Swoop or anyone else had posted it. I'm not 'out to get' 1061 and I'm not using other posters to do that or any of the other rubbish you're accusing me of. If her posts warrant removal, they'll be removed with no further consequences for anyone else, just like anybody else's would be.

In this case, your thread title was inappropriate and was edited accordingly. Can we move on?


I'm not saying you're out to get 1061., She does serve up stuff for you to moderate on. You simply misapplied this because you can't escape your literalism. Literalism doesn't allow for irony.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmiH7pD3-Zs


I'm not going to argue with you about this any more, but I just want to say that I think your accusation is unfair and incorrect. I do have a good ear for irony, context and nuance, I think, and if anything I think you're taking too much of a binary view of it.

But at the end of the day, you have to take the moderators you get; all I can give you is my promise that I'm going to continue to try my best to moderate fairly and in accordance with the rules.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Wokko Pisces

Come and take it.


Joined: 04 Oct 2005


PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 11:52 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I get a bit fed up with your anti fat shaming crusade bleeding into your moderating. It just makes me want to try and slide as many fat chick jokes or comments past you as I possibly can.

Being fat doesn't make you a protected person, and being fat is in almost all cases under the control of the fat person.

If you want to continue this devouring and defecating of free speech then I expect every Balmy bread roll joke from the last decade to be found and deleted. Laughing
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 12:12 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Wokko wrote:
being fat is in almost all cases under the control of the fat person.


Really? I'd disagree vociferously with you on that, but this is hardly the thread to do so. Perhaps we can save it for another time.

The free speech rules on Nick's are both liberal and bounded. You can express any political opinion and say whatever you like so long as you don't spam, troll, gratuitously post off-topic, use inappropriate language, profess your love for Carlton, vilify people or abuse or bully others. Those are the rules of this forum, and enforcing them is not defecating on free speech. If you want an unmoderated forum, I'm sure there are plenty out there in the cybersphere.

As for trying to slide stuff past the mods, I'd advise against it. I have pretty sharp 'ears', and there's a bit of an expectation here that you respect direct requests by moderators.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Joel Capricorn



Joined: 23 Mar 1999
Location: Mornington Peninsula

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 12:26 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The life of being a mod. Not easy, particularly when you are active on a board and you see the posts before the other mods do. You become an easy target for criticism.

Haven't read the original thread and I probably won't bother after reading this thread. Anyone that feels the need to rip into other people because they are overweight needs to get a life.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Jezza Taurus

2023 PREMIERS!


Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 5:42 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Most people appreciate your efforts as a moderator David. I certainly do and hope you can remain as one on this forum.

However constructive feedback can be helpful when necessary and if you can come across as fair and flexible towards posters more posters will approach you more confidently about different issues and concerns that may arise in the future on this forum.

I think it's great we have a platform here where people can voice their praises and concerns about the moderation of this forum and provide helpful and constructive feedback as to how to make the forum a better experience for users.

David wrote:
The free speech rules on Nick's are both liberal and bounded. You can express any political opinion and say whatever you like so long as you don't spam, troll, gratuitously post off-topic, use inappropriate language, profess your love for Carlton, vilify people or abuse or bully others. Those are the rules of this forum, and enforcing them is not defecating on free speech. If you want an unmoderated forum, I'm sure there are plenty out there in the cybersphere.

I love it David! I'm glad you snuck that one in! Laughing Laughing Laughing

_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 |
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Feedback All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group