Death Penalty?
Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Death Penalty |
| Yes |
|
41% |
[ 13 ] |
| No |
|
45% |
[ 14 ] |
| Not Sure |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
| I really wanna spank the Monkey |
|
9% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 31 |
|
| Author |
Message |
David 
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| Doc63 wrote: | | think positive wrote: | | How does every one feel about the Paris killers? Death penalty? |
Yes, very slowly, very painfully and then uploaded to You Tube. |
Terrific idea. Let's become just as barbaric as they are.
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
 |
1061
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| David wrote: | | Doc63 wrote: | | think positive wrote: | | How does every one feel about the Paris killers? Death penalty? |
Yes, very slowly, very painfully and then uploaded to You Tube. |
Terrific idea. Let's become just as barbaric as they are. |
Well the Bible does say an eye for an eye! |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere
|
| Post subject: | |
|
true, but the jihad one says 25 pairs of eyes, 26 tongues, 48 right hands for an eye!!
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| 1061 wrote: | | David wrote: | | Doc63 wrote: | | think positive wrote: | | How does every one feel about the Paris killers? Death penalty? |
Yes, very slowly, very painfully and then uploaded to You Tube. |
Terrific idea. Let's become just as barbaric as they are. |
Well the Bible does say an eye for an eye! |
Indeed it does. Thank God we don't live in a theocratic society, hey!
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
1061
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| David wrote: | | 1061 wrote: | | David wrote: | | Doc63 wrote: | | think positive wrote: | | How does every one feel about the Paris killers? Death penalty? |
Yes, very slowly, very painfully and then uploaded to You Tube. |
Terrific idea. Let's become just as barbaric as they are. |
Well the Bible does say an eye for an eye! |
Indeed it does. Thank God we don't live in a theocratic society, hey! |
Thank God indeed that we have the NEW TESTAMENT that pretty much superseded the old one. |
|
|
|
|
David
I dare you to try
Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda
|
| Post subject: | |
|
And the enlightenment!
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace |
|
|
|
|
Doc63
Joined: 06 May 2004
Location: Newport
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| David wrote: | | Doc63 wrote: | | think positive wrote: | | How does every one feel about the Paris killers? Death penalty? |
Yes, very slowly, very painfully and then uploaded to You Tube. |
Terrific idea. Let's become just as barbaric as they are. |
These dirt-bagging peddlers of misery know exactly what the penalties are when they carry drugs in some of these countries, but when they get caught, they expect the Federal Government, to get them out of it.
Of course, the death penalty is way over the top for the crime, but they know & accept the risk when they enter these countries.
Not one cent of taxpayers money should be spent trying to save them.
And don't get me started on the Boogie Board <snip>.
_________________
I hold a cup of wisdom, but there is nothing within. |
|
|
|
|
laird
Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Location: Perth
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| David wrote: | | And the enlightenment! |
Sadly, not all do.
_________________
" Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye" ? |
|
|
|
|
Tannin 
Can't remember
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| 1061 wrote: | | David wrote: | | 1061 wrote: |
Well the Bible does say an eye for an eye! |
Indeed it does. Thank God we don't live in a theocratic society, hey! |
Thank God indeed that we have the NEW TESTAMENT that pretty much superseded the old one. |
So this would be the new one that is only 2000 years out of date, as opposed to the superseded old one that is now 2500 years out of date?
Or are we talking something quite advanced and modern which superseded both of them, such as the Koran, which is only 1400 years out of date?
But that too has been superseded by the Book of Mormon, which is a mere couple of centuries out of date.
However on reflection, since we really want the latest and best information, like 8 million others around the world, we had better consult the Kitáb-i-Aqdas, which superseded all of the above and and is only 140 years out of date. So far as religious books to replace all religious books go, it practically still has the ink wet.
_________________
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives! |
|
|
|
|
Wokko 
Come and take it.
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Quibbling about Old and New Testaments is a bit silly, I don't see Jews still following every letter of the Laws of Moses. Not sure how religious people of an Abrahamic bent (Jews, Christians and Muslims) manage to reconcile picking and choosing between immutable laws of God, but I'll save that for another thread. |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie 
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Tannin wrote: | | 1061 wrote: | | David wrote: | | 1061 wrote: |
Well the Bible does say an eye for an eye! |
Indeed it does. Thank God we don't live in a theocratic society, hey! |
Thank God indeed that we have the NEW TESTAMENT that pretty much superseded the old one. |
So this would be the new one that is only 2000 years out of date, as opposed to the superseded old one that is now 2500 years out of date?
Or are we talking something quite advanced and modern which superseded both of them, such as the Koran, which is only 1400 years out of date?
But that too has been superseded by the Book of Mormon, which is a mere couple of centuries out of date.
However on reflection, since we really want the latest and best information, like 8 million others around the world, we had better consult the Kitáb-i-Aqdas, which superseded all of the above and and is only 140 years out of date. So far as religious books to replace all religious books go, it practically still has the ink wet. |
or just consult the masters apprentices.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKE2hmgzUgo
Do what you wanna do .......................
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Wokko
Come and take it.
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Tannin wrote: | | 1061 wrote: | | David wrote: | | 1061 wrote: |
Well the Bible does say an eye for an eye! |
Indeed it does. Thank God we don't live in a theocratic society, hey! |
Thank God indeed that we have the NEW TESTAMENT that pretty much superseded the old one. |
So this would be the new one that is only 2000 years out of date, as opposed to the superseded old one that is now 2500 years out of date?
Or are we talking something quite advanced and modern which superseded both of them, such as the Koran, which is only 1400 years out of date?
But that too has been superseded by the Book of Mormon, which is a mere couple of centuries out of date.
However on reflection, since we really want the latest and best information, like 8 million others around the world, we had better consult the Kitáb-i-Aqdas, which superseded all of the above and and is only 140 years out of date. So far as religious books to replace all religious books go, it practically still has the ink wet. |
L.Ron Hubbard begs to differ. |
|
|
|
|
Doc63
Joined: 06 May 2004
Location: Newport
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Wokko wrote: | | Quibbling about Old and New Testaments is a bit silly, I don't see Jews still following every letter of the Laws of Moses. Not sure how religious people of an Abrahamic bent (Jews, Christians and Muslims) manage to reconcile picking and choosing between immutable laws of God, but I'll save that for another thread. |
They just pick the ones that suit them. Everything else, they ignore.
_________________
I hold a cup of wisdom, but there is nothing within. |
|
|
|
|
Tannin
Can't remember
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Wokko wrote: | | Tannin wrote: | | 1061 wrote: | | David wrote: | | 1061 wrote: |
Well the Bible does say an eye for an eye! |
Indeed it does. Thank God we don't live in a theocratic society, hey! |
Thank God indeed that we have the NEW TESTAMENT that pretty much superseded the old one. |
So this would be the new one that is only 2000 years out of date, as opposed to the superseded old one that is now 2500 years out of date?
Or are we talking something quite advanced and modern which superseded both of them, such as the Koran, which is only 1400 years out of date?
But that too has been superseded by the Book of Mormon, which is a mere couple of centuries out of date.
However on reflection, since we really want the latest and best information, like 8 million others around the world, we had better consult the Kitáb-i-Aqdas, which superseded all of the above and and is only 140 years out of date. So far as religious books to replace all religious books go, it practically still has the ink wet. |
L.Ron Hubbard begs to differ. |
Not so.
The others I mentioned are actual religions, whereas L.Ron Hubbard's Scientology is just a clever trick to take over the minds of, and with any luck benefit from, the credulous and not-so-bright ....
... er .....
Sorry.
As you were.
_________________
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives! |
|
|
|
|
Tannin
Can't remember
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Wokko wrote: | | L.Ron Hubbard begs to differ. |
Sorry.  I actually thought of mentioning him at one point, but then I forgot.
His novels, by the way, back before he (got religion/thought of a better scam), were pretty amazing. I have quite a few of them. They are like Twisties or McDonalds hamburgers. You know perfectly well they aren't food, you feel a bit guilty about encouraging the bastards by giving them money, and sometimes you consume a few of them anyway for no good reason you can possibly think of - becoming more and more convinced that they are not food with every mouthful as, in the back of your mind, that little part of you which watches everything and thinks more deeply tries to figure out why you are still eating and what the secret recipe is that makes you do it.
(In my defence, I hasten to point out that I took care not to buy any of LRH's books new in case any of my money went to his estate and, via that, to some cruel ripoff of the dopes his "religion" targets. I bought them second-hand. At one time there were zillions of mint copies available second-hand 'coz, frankly, they are rubbish and no-one who bought them thought they were worth keeping.)
(Thus far, I haven't tried second-hand Twisties or McDonalds hamburgers, though I should imagine that used ones taste much the same as fresh ones, differing only by being slightly more nutritious.)
_________________
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
