Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Hostage situation in Sydney

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern
 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 20, 21, 22  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 10:23 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I heard other people use clueless here in the strict sense - not as a sneer or an insult; pointing out that we don't know what happened we have no clues about it and won't know until the inquest if too.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
1061 



Joined: 06 Sep 2013


PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 11:15 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

nomadjack wrote:
1061 wrote:
Culprit wrote:
swoop42 wrote:
There is victims of crime compensation.
There is but they will get $1500 under that. Under the Terrorism rule you can get up to $70K.


That would explain why the authorities are so keen for this to be seen as the work of a lone madman and not a terrorist.


Do you actually believe this? Shocked


Turns out the compensation is about $15,000 not $1500.

How can anyone decide being held hostage is more traumatizing that being bashed or raped or pick your crime.

if it goes up to $70,000 that should be for everyone.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Culprit Cancer



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: Port Melbourne

PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 11:24 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

1061 wrote:
nomadjack wrote:
1061 wrote:
Culprit wrote:
swoop42 wrote:
There is victims of crime compensation.
There is but they will get $1500 under that. Under the Terrorism rule you can get up to $70K.


That would explain why the authorities are so keen for this to be seen as the work of a lone madman and not a terrorist.


Do you actually believe this? Shocked


Turns out the compensation is about $15,000 not $1500.

How can anyone decide being held hostage is more traumatizing that being bashed or raped or pick your crime.

if it goes up to $70,000 that should be for everyone.
Let's clarify no matter what the situation it is like any compensation "It's up too"? Who determines what each person gets? Is the women who wants a six figure sum for her story entitled to any compensation? And yes
Quote:
How can anyone decide being held hostage is more traumatizing that being bashed or raped or pick your crime.
My View it's Political Point scoring and nothing more.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Skids Cancer

Quitting drinking will be one of the best choices you make in your life.


Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Location: Joined 3/6/02 . Member #175

PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 12:20 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Fred Nile ....

“They should get recognition for what they suffered as hostages but I don’t think they should get bravery awards,” Nile told Fairfax Radio. “Maybe they could have done something more to protect the women.

“Normally bravery awards are given for an act of bravery – that somebody actually does something. They haven’t done anything.”

How can anyone have a go at him for that statement?

I don't know enough about the bloke, but what he said there is correct IMO.

_________________
Don't count the days, make the days count.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
1061 



Joined: 06 Sep 2013


PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 12:25 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe the comment about the only real man in the cafe being the man with the gun got people off side.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
nomadjack 



Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Location: Essendon

PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 12:33 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

1061 wrote:
nomadjack wrote:
1061 wrote:
Culprit wrote:
swoop42 wrote:
There is victims of crime compensation.
There is but they will get $1500 under that. Under the Terrorism rule you can get up to $70K.


That would explain why the authorities are so keen for this to be seen as the work of a lone madman and not a terrorist.


Do you actually believe this? Shocked


Turns out the compensation is about $15,000 not $1500.

How can anyone decide being held hostage is more traumatizing that being bashed or raped or pick your crime.

if it goes up to $70,000 that should be for everyone.


Do you actually believe though that the amount of compensation payable would influence whether government classified this as a terrorist attack? Shocked
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
1061 



Joined: 06 Sep 2013


PostPosted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 1:21 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

nomadjack wrote:
1061 wrote:
nomadjack wrote:
1061 wrote:
Culprit wrote:
swoop42 wrote:
There is victims of crime compensation.
There is but they will get $1500 under that. Under the Terrorism rule you can get up to $70K.


That would explain why the authorities are so keen for this to be seen as the work of a lone madman and not a terrorist.


Do you actually believe this? Shocked


Turns out the compensation is about $15,000 not $1500.

How can anyone decide being held hostage is more traumatizing that being bashed or raped or pick your crime.

if it goes up to $70,000 that should be for everyone.


Do you actually believe though that the amount of compensation payable would influence whether government classified this as a terrorist attack? Shocked


Well Yes!

Do you trust the Government with everything.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
3.14159 Taurus



Joined: 12 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:18 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems even the Police have questions about how the siege was handled!

wrote:
Tensions have emerged among police about the command strategy during the Lindt cafe siege and a late decision that some officers believe put hostages at greater risk.
...
It appears police had no or little direct contact with Monis. On the account of Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione during the siege, at 5.33pm he said "in fact we're not dealing directly with him".
Mr Scipione repeated that advice at 6.07pm and 7.46pm, when he said: "At this stage we do not have direct contact with the offender."
Among those to offer their services were the Grand Mufti of Australia, Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohammad, but he was not called in – neither to help negotiate nor to advise police.


http://www.smh.com.au/national/police-divided-over-strategy-during-lindt-cafe-siege-in-martin-place-sydney-20150111-12lykf.html

As to who was in over-all command (or should have been) is anyones guess!

wrote:
"The SEOCON role is held by the Deputy Commissioner, Field Operations, NSW Police Force."
The head of field operations would normally be Deputy Commissioner Nick Kaldas but Assistant Commissioner Loy was acting in his role on the day due to illness.
A statement by police said Commissioner Andrew Scipione had deployed the counter-terrorism unit under the banner of Task Force Pioneer, led by Assistant Commissioner Mark Murdoch who reports to Ms Burn.
According to the police statement, Assistant Commissioner Loy was not in the senior coordinating role during most of the siege.
"Jeff Loy was the senior officer at the State Crisis Centre late on the evening of the siege as part of the relief arrangements," police said.


http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/questions-over-martin-place-siege-command-as-joint-investigation-nears-completion-20150117-12sbjy.html

wrote:
Premier Mike Baird leapt to defend Assistant Police Commissioner Catherine Burn after the suggestion emerged she had misled ministers over whether it was police bullets, or the gunman, that had killed or injured hostages.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Bruce Gonsalves Gemini



Joined: 05 Jul 2012


PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:20 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

3.14159 wrote:
It seems even the Police have questions about how the siege was handled!

wrote:
Tensions have emerged among police about the command strategy during the Lindt cafe siege and a late decision that some officers believe put hostages at greater risk.
...
It appears police had no or little direct contact with Monis. On the account of Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione during the siege, at 5.33pm he said "in fact we're not dealing directly with him".
Mr Scipione repeated that advice at 6.07pm and 7.46pm, when he said: "At this stage we do not have direct contact with the offender."
Among those to offer their services were the Grand Mufti of Australia, Dr Ibrahim Abu Mohammad, but he was not called in – neither to help negotiate nor to advise police.


http://www.smh.com.au/national/police-divided-over-strategy-during-lindt-cafe-siege-in-martin-place-sydney-20150111-12lykf.html

As to who was in over-all command (or should have been) is anyones guess!

wrote:
"The SEOCON role is held by the Deputy Commissioner, Field Operations, NSW Police Force."
The head of field operations would normally be Deputy Commissioner Nick Kaldas but Assistant Commissioner Loy was acting in his role on the day due to illness.
A statement by police said Commissioner Andrew Scipione had deployed the counter-terrorism unit under the banner of Task Force Pioneer, led by Assistant Commissioner Mark Murdoch who reports to Ms Burn.
According to the police statement, Assistant Commissioner Loy was not in the senior coordinating role during most of the siege.
"Jeff Loy was the senior officer at the State Crisis Centre late on the evening of the siege as part of the relief arrangements," police said.


http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/questions-over-martin-place-siege-command-as-joint-investigation-nears-completion-20150117-12sbjy.html

wrote:
Premier Mike Baird leapt to defend Assistant Police Commissioner Catherine Burn after the suggestion emerged she had misled ministers over whether it was police bullets, or the gunman, that had killed or injured hostages.



May have been a better result if Christine Nixon was in charge.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Wokko Pisces

Come and take it.


Joined: 04 Oct 2005


PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2015 9:33 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Bruce Gonsalves wrote:


May have been a better result if Christine Nixon was in charge.


Laughing

She could've pissed off for lunch somewhere and been unreachable.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
ronrat 



Joined: 22 May 2006
Location: Thailand

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2015 2:49 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Wokko wrote:
Bruce Gonsalves wrote:


May have been a better result if Christine Nixon was in charge.


Laughing

She could've pissed off for lunch somewhere and been unreachable.


If she thought Lindt chocolates were at risk she would have donned a flak jacket and stormed the building. The hostages may have got out but at least 10kg of chocolates would have paid with their lives.

I wonder how many operational roles the Assistant Commissioner has held given her "we are following events on twitter" type comments.

_________________
Annoying opposition supporters since 1967.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 2:53 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

So, the score at full-time appears to have Dangerous Man with Guns 1: Police 1.

"A coronial inquest into the deaths that occurred during the siege at Sydney’s Martin Place has heard that Katrina Dawson was killed by fragments of a police bullet.

The inquest, which began today (29 January) at the Coroner’s Court in Glebe, revealed that Dawson died when six fragments of police bullets ricocheted off the walls of the Lindt café and struck a major blood vessel.

Dawson, a barrister at the nearby Eight Selborne Chambers, lost consciousness and died shortly after being hit.

Jeremy Gormly SC, counsel assisting the coroner, also revealed that gunman Man Haron Monis forced Lindt café manager Tori Johnson to kneel before shooting him in the back of the head.

Monis was shot twice in the head and at least 11 times in the body, which killed him instantly, the inquest heard.

Dawson and Johnson were among 17 hostages held for 16 hours inside the café in December 2014."


http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/news/16101-inquest-reveals-barrister-katrina-dawson-killed-by-police-bullet
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Pies4shaw Leo

pies4shaw


Joined: 08 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 2:54 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Or on reflection, Police 2.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
think positive Libra

Side By Side


Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere

PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 5:38 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Police zero, ^&*^*% 3, none of this would have happened if he didn't want his 15 min of fame
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2015 5:40 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

What's your favourite movie?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 20, 21, 22  Next
Page 21 of 22   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group