View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
inxs88
Joined: 17 Aug 2014
|
Post subject: Ahmad Saad NO! | |
|
Please don't even go near him in either the National or rookie draft. One trick pony and annoying one at that (re goal kicking run up) _________________ I love the Pies, hate Carlscum |
|
|
|
|
Dave The Man
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
Well I have Read we have Gurnateed him we pick him at Pick 48 _________________ I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
swoop42
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008 Location: The 18
|
Post subject: | |
|
Dave The Man wrote: | Well I have Read we have Gurnateed him we pick him at Pick 48 |
Read where?
Provide link.
I know there are some rumours of us selecting him over at bigfooty but I can't imagine we'd need to use pick 48 to get him.
More a pick 85/rookie selection at best.
Personally I hope zero interest in him and do not want. _________________ He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
Dave The Man
Joined: 01 Apr 2005 Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
swoop42 wrote: | Dave The Man wrote: | Well I have Read we have Gurnateed him we pick him at Pick 48 |
Read where?
Provide link.
I know there are some rumours of us selecting him over at bigfooty but I can't imagine we'd need to use pick 48 to get him.
More a pick 85/rookie selection at best.
Personally I hope zero interest in him and do not want. |
In the Draft Rumor Thread. Someone said We have told him we pick at 48 _________________ I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
Podpicken
Joined: 28 Oct 2006
|
Post subject: | |
|
I'd be disappointed with that. I think rookie at best, all depending on whether we've met that particular requirement with this draft. Not sure he's the answer when having a choice of a top 50 kid in the land or him. _________________ Billy Picken, the great No. 25 in the sky! |
|
|
|
|
winpies
Joined: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Perth, Western Australia
|
|
|
|
|
duggieboy
Joined: 12 Jan 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
I'm with you inxs - saw him play in Wellington and feel we could do much better with the upside that a newby will bring - but stranger things have happened! |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
Dave The Man wrote: | swoop42 wrote: | Dave The Man wrote: | Well I have Read we have Gurnateed him we pick him at Pick 48 |
Read where?
Provide link.
I know there are some rumours of us selecting him over at bigfooty but I can't imagine we'd need to use pick 48 to get him.
More a pick 85/rookie selection at best.
Personally I hope zero interest in him and do not want. |
In the Draft Rumor Thread. Someone said We have told him we pick at 48 |
you wouldn't want to offer anything other than a late round pick or a rookie spot. his goal kicking is around 63% (not including oob). _________________ Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
inxs88
Joined: 17 Aug 2014
|
Post subject: | |
|
we would have been better off selecting jeff garlett (if we are pursuing this type of recruit) even though he is a jib _________________ I love the Pies, hate Carlscum |
|
|
|
|
watt price tully
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
inxs88 wrote: | we would have been better off selecting jeff garlett (if we are pursuing this type of recruit) even though he is a jib |
Does jib mean squib?
Or is it a derivation from Gip, i.e. Gypsy or more accurately for him an Egyptian, both parents I thought were Olympic representatives from Egypt or some such thing _________________ âI even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didnât keep âem under long enoughâ Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
|
Jezza
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010 Location: Ponsford End
|
Post subject: | |
|
Strange rumour. I would have thought Hine and Rendall would look at a young kid who hasn't been through the AFL system lately instead of Saad but they must think he's worth looking at.
Admittedly we do we need a small forward though and looking at his stats from 2012 and 2013, Saad can find the goals but he doesn't get a lot of the ball and can go missing quite often.
Just read the article and it says we could take him in the rookie draft. That's not so bad and we wouldn't lose too much if it fails. _________________ | 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
King Malta
RIP Flip
Joined: 24 Mar 2008 Location: Gettin' Wiggy
|
Post subject: | |
|
Got no issues with taking him in the Rookie Draft if the club deems he fills a need in our team (and like Jezza said, another small forward is on that needs list). |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Location: Bendigo
|
Post subject: | |
|
Would rather the club look at a McLean or Langdon type in the draft to fill the small forward void. They'd definitely have more upside |
|
|
|
|
roar
Joined: 01 Sep 2004
|
Post subject: | |
|
I'd be super disappointed if that rumour turned out to be true. Reckon it's total BS, though. _________________ kill for collingwood! |
|
|
|
|
Presti35
Dick Lee for Legend Status
Joined: 05 Oct 2001 Location: London, England
|
Post subject: | |
|
As a rookie selection, I say take him. _________________ A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned! |
|
|
|
|
|