 |
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
think positive 
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005
Location: somewhere
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| ronrat wrote: | This is a "just in case " law. It will still go on. Its just most of us are not really concerned about some bogan from Narre Warren sending this stuff but to protect the fuggin idiots who suddenly become important because they appeared on some reality show. or got a gig on neighbours.
Although "stolen" work like the Nick reiwoldt stuff just goes to show what a bloody idiot he was for evening keeping it and that Zac Dawson is possibly the stupidest person who ever played football. |
Wasn't nicks fault at all, it was taken without his consent, and then he demanded it be deleted and was told it was.
And he was the only one who stayed dignified throughout
_________________
You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
 |
1061
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| swoop42 wrote: | | stui magpie wrote: | | 1061 wrote: | | think positive wrote: | | David wrote: | | think positive wrote: | Unless it's a porno magazine or the like, should you be sharing nude or sexualised others? You wanna share your own goodies, good on you, but if you've got a naked pic of your missus on the phone, I would have thought decorum would stop you sharing it, unless of course she thinks it's cool.
I think it's a great law. Protects a hell of a lot of stupid teenagers. |
Decorum, yes. But whether that's the law's job to regulate is quite another matter.
I'm certainly a fan of a law that would prosecute the distributors of 'revenge porn'. But whether people who pass on, say, a naked photo of a celebrity (even if improperly obtained) should receive a criminal conviction is another matter.
There were, for instance, certain photos of St. Kilda footballers that people here linked to. I didn't think much of that behaviour then or now, but the idea of those posters being prosecuted and facing jail time seems way too much.
As I said, I hope that 'malicious' means what a reasonable person would assume it to mean.
On the plus side, though, this might well put a few gossip magazines out of business. |
yeah I still have those pics!! 
but I don't pass them on!!  |
and in that case lets not make a mountain out of a mole hill. |
Leave Lee Montagna out of this.  |
It was Nicky Dal.
Unless you have others. |
Oh yes there are many other photo's of aussie sports men and women in various state of undress/excitement around. Including one star almost up to his elbow in it at a Bucks Party with a hooker who months later was found dead in a laneway. No connection of course although the star is known as being one of the few high flyers who "just said no" |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw 
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Jezza wrote: | Does anyone know the name of the legislation where this prohibition has been enacted into our law system?
I'm interested in reading this further in more detail. |
It's in the Summary Offences Act. In Part 4A. The changes were introduced by the Crimes Amendment (Sexual Offences and Other Matters) Act 2014, Pages 37ff of the Amended Print Explanatory Memorandum explain how the Parliament thinks this will work.
I know that you will know where to find these things but in case anyone else is interested, all of this can be found in http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/
The current form of the Summary Offences Act can be found in "Victorian Law Today", the amending Act can be found in "Victorian Statute Book" and the EM can be found in "Parliamentary Documents". |
|
|
|
|
Jezza 
2023 PREMIERS!
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Location: Ponsford End
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Pies4shaw wrote: | | Jezza wrote: | Does anyone know the name of the legislation where this prohibition has been enacted into our law system?
I'm interested in reading this further in more detail. |
It's in the Summary Offences Act. In Part 4A. The changes were introduced by the Crimes Amendment (Sexual Offences and Other Matters) Act 2014, Pages 37ff of the Amended Print Explanatory Memorandum explain how the Parliament thinks this will work.
I know that you will know where to find these things but in case anyone else is interested, all of this can be found in http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/
The current form of the Summary Offences Act can be found in "Victorian Law Today", the amending Act can be found in "Victorian Statute Book" and the EM can be found in "Parliamentary Documents". |
Thanks for that P4S 
_________________
| 1902 | 1903 | 1910 | 1917 | 1919 | 1927 | 1928 | 1929 | 1930 | 1935 | 1936 | 1953 | 1958 | 1990 | 2010 | 2023 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
