Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
A round 1 ,2 & 3 Draft selection

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> The Draft & Trade Moot (DTM) forum
 
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BazBoy 



Joined: 11 Sep 2014


PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 8:08 am
Post subject: A round 1 ,2 & 3 Draft selectionReply with quote

Round one we have #5
" " two " " #30
" " three " #48
Then nothing till round 5 (an 80 something)
A good #5 Scott Pendelbury
And a #65 Tom Langdon
" " # 63 Tyson Goldsack
" " #41 Jack Frost
So deeper in there are good,uns
Be thorough DH and pluck a pearler

_________________
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MJ23 



Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Location: Sydney

PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 8:12 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

doubt we will use any pick past 48 with the players we brought in
_________________
"Even when Im old and gray, I wont be able to play but Ill still love the game"
Michael Jordan
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
BazBoy 



Joined: 11 Sep 2014


PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 8:21 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Deka said as much and in fact primarily 5 was as far as he projected
But he is a shrewdy
Our trades should bolster parts of 2014 team

_________________
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:28 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

barrybc41 wrote:
Deka said as much and in fact primarily 5 was as far as he projected
But he is a shrewdy
Our trades should bolster parts of 2014 team


We can't draft to too many pistons because we are near capacity as it is.

The only way we could draft beyond 5, 30 & 48 is to rookie list others, promote others, not promote rookies & de-list or some combination of the those options.

The word pass will be used on draft day quite a bit I reckon by Hine & co.

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:30 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

How much is that?
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
BazBoy 



Joined: 11 Sep 2014


PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 3:43 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Just lookin at AFL draft clips and see #48 which happens to be our pick in Round 3
A kid called Dylan Hodge & brother of Luke --looked good
Hey!! Tell me i,m dreamin

_________________
I'm not arguing--just explaining why i am right
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Stupied 



Joined: 14 Mar 2013


PostPosted: Thu Oct 23, 2014 6:37 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

We won't use past 48. As it is, we still need to delist at least one player to get past 30.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
magpieazza 

magpieazza


Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Location: Griffith N.S.W

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 1:36 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Just read an article about Mckernan, who was just delisted from the crows, saying his best football is in front of him and at age 25 years I would agree.

A fullforward / ruckman doesn't come by easy and he looks cherry ripe to take perhaps in the rookie draft.

He wants to play and if he plays at the expense of Witts and/or Grundy, it would be because he has earned it. Im not worried about taking away game time from the youngsters especially Witts, because he has had chances. I do suspect Witts will come into his own next year but we need competition for spots on the list.

Who is with me?

I was never a big fan of SM but he could thrive at a new club. Its not like we are strong in the ruck/forward department.

_________________
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 1:42 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

magpieazza wrote:
Just read an article about Mckernan, who was just delisted from the crows, saying his best football is in front of him and at age 25 years I would agree.

A fullforward / ruckman doesn't come by easy and he looks cherry ripe to take perhaps in the rookie draft.

He wants to play and if he plays at the expense of Witts and/or Grundy, it would be because he has earned it. Im not worried about taking away game time from the youngsters especially Witts, because he has had chances. I do suspect Witts will come into his own next year but we need competition for spots on the list.

Who is with me?

I was never a big fan of SM but he could thrive at a new club. Its not like we are strong in the ruck/forward department.


I really don't think we need another ruckman. White will be our reserve ruckman in the off-chance both Witts and Grundy get injured. Otherwise we need both Witts and Grundy to get as much senior games time as possible.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
iamsam Scorpio



Joined: 12 May 2006
Location: sunbury

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 2:15 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I think he would be worthy of a rookie spot as backup. When he was delisted they said on SEN that Matt Rendell was a big fan of his.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
35forever 

"I feel sick - dada dada dada da"


Joined: 23 Feb 2005
Location: Physical=Sunshine Coast -- Mental=Vic Park

PostPosted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:04 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd love to see us grab McKernan, his bro was a gun and he has a lovely big hoof. Take him as backup/pressure for the tall forwards. At the opposite end of the scale what number is Jack Lonie likely to go? The kid is small but he has an incredible foot, just like his two cousins who were among the best kicks of a footy I've ever seen. He could turn out to be a devastating small forward, check out his TAC form. And he's a Dandenong boy like myself and Pants!
_________________
"If at first you dont succeed...
... oh who cares, we did it!!!!!"

-me, 2010
"The pies are going to the big dance!"-P.Daicos 2010
Visit My Website!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
magpieazza 

magpieazza


Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Location: Griffith N.S.W

PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:18 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

RudeBoy wrote:
magpieazza wrote:
Just read an article about Mckernan, who was just delisted from the crows, saying his best football is in front of him and at age 25 years I would agree.

A fullforward / ruckman doesn't come by easy and he looks cherry ripe to take perhaps in the rookie draft.

He wants to play and if he plays at the expense of Witts and/or Grundy, it would be because he has earned it. Im not worried about taking away game time from the youngsters especially Witts, because he has had chances. I do suspect Witts will come into his own next year but we need competition for spots on the list.

Who is with me?

I was never a big fan of SM but he could thrive at a new club. Its not like we are strong in the ruck/forward department.


I really don't think we need another ruckman. White will be our reserve ruckman in the off-chance both Witts and Grundy get injured. Otherwise we need both Witts and Grundy to get as much senior games time as possible.


Im happy to see Witts/ Grundy as first choice rucks but remember Mckernan is actually not a bad forward option, which I think may give us an edge. Neither Grundy or Witts have the experience under their belts to dominate an established key position backman.... Im thinking when the big blockbusters come around against the top two or three teams, we will need nous and experience.

_________________
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Sat Oct 25, 2014 2:06 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

magpieazza wrote:
RudeBoy wrote:
magpieazza wrote:
Just read an article about Mckernan, who was just delisted from the crows, saying his best football is in front of him and at age 25 years I would agree.

A fullforward / ruckman doesn't come by easy and he looks cherry ripe to take perhaps in the rookie draft.

He wants to play and if he plays at the expense of Witts and/or Grundy, it would be because he has earned it. Im not worried about taking away game time from the youngsters especially Witts, because he has had chances. I do suspect Witts will come into his own next year but we need competition for spots on the list.

Who is with me?

I was never a big fan of SM but he could thrive at a new club. Its not like we are strong in the ruck/forward department.


I really don't think we need another ruckman. White will be our reserve ruckman in the off-chance both Witts and Grundy get injured. Otherwise we need both Witts and Grundy to get as much senior games time as possible.


Im happy to see Witts/ Grundy as first choice rucks but remember Mckernan is actually not a bad forward option, which I think may give us an edge. Neither Grundy or Witts have the experience under their belts to dominate an established key position backman.... Im thinking when the big blockbusters come around against the top two or three teams, we will need nous and experience.


You might be right magpieazza, but I expect both Witts and Grundy to really step up a notch or two next year. I also think Moore will play senior footy and if the rumors are true there's a 211 cm monster called Mason Cox who may just force his way into the team late in the season. If we were to rookie a mature ruckman, purely for insurance, then I would be hoping they never got to play for the seniors.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> The Draft & Trade Moot (DTM) forum All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Page 1 of 1   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group