| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CarringbushCigar 
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Location: wherever I lay my beanie
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
Barrett said he has heard from his sources - his dad is 20% of the reason, the main reason is he just wants out of Collingwood.
If this is true, or close to true - its a very possible scenario.
Straight swap would be awesome - hell id even throw in Sinclair and our 3rd round pick to make it irresistible on paper. |
|
|
|
 |
King Malta 
RIP Flip
Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Location: Gettin' Wiggy
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Sinclair and our 3rd rounder?
Beams for Treloar is already fair, if they want more we can deal with Brisbane or the Gold Coast. We'd be trading them a ready made superstar for someone with the potential to be a superstar.
Current ability outweighs potential every day of the week. If they want a sweetener then I'd (if it were up to me  ) MAYBE throw in a third rounder but there's no way we should give up a player as well as Beams. |
|
|
|
|
CarringbushCigar
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Location: wherever I lay my beanie
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| He is more than a kid with potential, Laurie. |
|
|
|
|
King Malta
RIP Flip
Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Location: Gettin' Wiggy
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| CarringbushCigar wrote: | | He is more than a kid with potential, Laurie. |
Do you think he's better than Beams?
Because I sure don't, and at this point in time what that means is he only has the POTENTIAL to be better than Beams. I've rated Treloar ever since he was drafted and would love to see him at the Pies but I'm not paying overs for him when we're offering them one of the best midfielders in the comp in rerturn. |
|
|
|
|
Joel 
Joined: 23 Mar 1999
Location: Mornington Peninsula
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I'd do this:
Pick 5 + Patfull to GWS
Treloar to COLL + Pick 25 to Coll (from GWS)
Beams to BRIS |
|
|
|
|
jackcass 
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| King Malta wrote: | | CarringbushCigar wrote: | | He is more than a kid with potential, Laurie. |
Do you think he's better than Beams?
Because I sure don't, and at this point in time what that means is he only has the POTENTIAL to be better than Beams. I've rated Treloar ever since he was drafted and would love to see him at the Pies but I'm not paying overs for him when we're offering them one of the best midfielders in the comp in rerturn. |
This. Beams was = 9th in the Brownlow this season unless I'm mistaken, where did Treloar finish? |
|
|
|
|
woftam 
I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| King Malta wrote: | | CarringbushCigar wrote: | | He is more than a kid with potential, Laurie. |
Do you think he's better than Beams?
Because I sure don't, and at this point in time what that means is he only has the POTENTIAL to be better than Beams. I've rated Treloar ever since he was drafted and would love to see him at the Pies but I'm not paying overs for him when we're offering them one of the best midfielders in the comp in rerturn. |
Agree. Right now Beams is the better player. We should not be willing to throw anything else in. |
|
|
|
|
Damien 
Me Noah & Flynn @ the G
Joined: 21 Jan 1999
Location: Croydon Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Joel wrote: | I'd do this:
Pick 5 + Patfull to GWS
Treloar to COLL + Pick 25 to Coll (from GWS)
Beams to BRIS |
that seems like a win win win to me
_________________
'Collingwood are the Bradmans of Football'
The Herald - 1930 |
|
|
|
|
Joel
Joined: 23 Mar 1999
Location: Mornington Peninsula
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Damien wrote: | | Joel wrote: | I'd do this:
Pick 5 + Patfull to GWS
Treloar to COLL + Pick 25 to Coll (from GWS)
Beams to BRIS |
that seems like a win win win to me |
Only thing I'm wondering is if GWS get too much? |
|
|
|
|
CarringbushCigar
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Location: wherever I lay my beanie
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| King Malta wrote: | | CarringbushCigar wrote: | | He is more than a kid with potential, Laurie. |
Do you think he's better than Beams?
. |
Let's put it this way Id rather have Treloar on the list today than Beams.
Given that Id throw in Sinclair if it made it compelling to GWS.
I've made it no secret I have serious concerns over Sinclair
maybe 3rd round as well went too far 
Treloar on the list brings genuine positivity and excitement to this football club. |
|
|
|
|
King Malta
RIP Flip
Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Location: Gettin' Wiggy
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| CarringbushCigar wrote: | | King Malta wrote: | | CarringbushCigar wrote: | | He is more than a kid with potential, Laurie. |
Do you think he's better than Beams?
. |
Let's put it this way Id rather have Treloar on the list today than Beams.
Given that Id throw in Sinclair if it made it compelling to GWS.
I've made it no secret I have serious concerns over Sinclair
maybe 3rd round as well went too far
Treloar on the list brings genuine positivity and excitement to this football club. |
I'd rather have him on the list, but that's now taking into account that it appears Beams is a bit of dick.
I obviously rate Sinclair higher than you so we're going to disagree, but to me he's not a throwaway player we should just include into a trade. He's one of the only lads we've got who possess genuine leg speed, he's also hard at it and he's disposal has been consistently on the up.
He would certainly bring genuine positivity, I agree, but I don't want us to to give more than we have to. |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Joel wrote: | I'd do this:
Pick 5 + Patfull to GWS
Treloar to COLL + Pick 25 to Coll (from GWS)
Beams to BRIS |
Then pick 25 to the Roos for Greenwood.
So we give up Beams for Treloar and Greenwood.
It's a win, win, win in my book.  |
|
|
|
|
Raw Hammer
Joined: 11 Sep 2008
Location: The Gutter
|
| Post subject: | |
|
GWS GIANTS @GWS_Giants
Contrary to speculation, @AdamTreloar is very much a required player and will not be traded. End of story.
3:53 PM - 7 Oct 2014
_________________
Est. 2002 |
|
|
|
|
John Wren 
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| King Malta wrote: | I'd rather have him on the list, but that's now taking into account that it appears Beams is a bit of dick.
I obviously rate Sinclair higher than you so we're going to disagree, but to me he's not a throwaway player we should just include into a trade. He's one of the only lads we've got who possess genuine leg speed, he's also hard at it and he's disposal has been consistently on the up.
He would certainly bring genuine positivity, I agree, but I don't want us to to give more than we have to. |
sinclair will be a very good footballer for us. would not even come into consideration other than by supporters who see a chance to offload him.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
woftam
I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| John Wren wrote: | | King Malta wrote: | I'd rather have him on the list, but that's now taking into account that it appears Beams is a bit of dick.
I obviously rate Sinclair higher than you so we're going to disagree, but to me he's not a throwaway player we should just include into a trade. He's one of the only lads we've got who possess genuine leg speed, he's also hard at it and he's disposal has been consistently on the up.
He would certainly bring genuine positivity, I agree, but I don't want us to to give more than we have to. |
sinclair will be a very good footballer for us. would not even come into consideration other than by supporters who see a chance to offload him. |
Yep - Keep Sinkers please. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
