 |
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Piesnchess
piesnchess
Joined: 09 Jun 2008
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| Lone Ranger wrote: | Im giving balance!
You and Piesnchess are effectively saying sacking the coach never works. Ive given some examples where it has worked. to balance this.
Im not saying it always works. Sheesh.
Various people not wanting to change the coach have mentioned that things can turn around quickly and quote Port as an example. The Port turn around is largely due to replacing Primus with Hinkley. |
Sure as hell didn't work for the Tigers when they sacked Hafey, or for the Deees when they sacked Norm Smith. It rarely, if ever, really works ! 
_________________
Poverty exists not because we cannot feed the poor, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.
Chess and Vodka are born brothers. - Russian proverb. |
|
|
|
 |
Lone Ranger
Joined: 02 Apr 2003
Location: Macedon Ranges
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Piesnchess wrote: | | Lone Ranger wrote: | Im giving balance!
You and Piesnchess are effectively saying sacking the coach never works. Ive given some examples where it has worked. to balance this.
Im not saying it always works. Sheesh.
Various people not wanting to change the coach have mentioned that things can turn around quickly and quote Port as an example. The Port turn around is largely due to replacing Primus with Hinkley. |
Sure as hell didn't work for the Tigers when they sacked Hafey, or for the Deees when they sacked Norm Smith. It rarely, if ever, really works ! |
Except you keep contradicting yourself by saying look at Port Adelaide and how quickly things can turn. Replacing the coach is largely responsible for the turnaround at Port. |
|
|
|
|
John Wren 
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Lone Ranger wrote: | | Piesnchess wrote: | | Lone Ranger wrote: | Im giving balance!
You and Piesnchess are effectively saying sacking the coach never works. Ive given some examples where it has worked. to balance this.
Im not saying it always works. Sheesh.
Various people not wanting to change the coach have mentioned that things can turn around quickly and quote Port as an example. The Port turn around is largely due to replacing Primus with Hinkley. |
Sure as hell didn't work for the Tigers when they sacked Hafey, or for the Deees when they sacked Norm Smith. It rarely, if ever, really works ! |
Except you keep contradicting yourself by saying look at Port Adelaide and how quickly things can turn. Replacing the coach is largely responsible for the turnaround at Port. |
freo have done ok since lyon came on board.
_________________
Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
Tezza23
Joined: 16 Mar 2014
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| I think its a two step process. if you sack a coach you need to also appoint a coach who can bring something that the group was missing. Its no use just sacking a coach if another "incompetent" coach is appointed. I think this is where sides like St Kilda and Richmond have erred in the past |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
