Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Bucks and Dangerfield

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> The Draft & Trade Moot (DTM) forum
 
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kymbo5@yahoo.com.au 



Joined: 23 Mar 2014


PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:06 am
Post subject: Bucks and DangerfieldReply with quote

Many here are speculating on the possible trade re Beams and how it might get Dangerfield to Collingwood.

I don't know of course, but I doubt Buckley would want Dangerfield after he was heavily involved/responsible in the Sanderson sacking. Kinda like bringing in a 'rat pack" player?? Of course, there is the loyalty to his best mate which might play a part too, albeit it a business decision admittedly.

_________________
kymbo
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
collie dog 

RIP Shelby 11-10-13


Joined: 07 Jun 2010
Location: Shelby Christmas dog

PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:13 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

If Dangerfield helps to get rid of Buckley I'd say bring it on!
_________________
Rain or hail, I wag my tail
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
AN_Inkling 



Joined: 06 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:22 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

If Dangerfield had a big say in Sanderson being sacked (seems at odds with statements earlier in the year), then there's very little chance he'd leave. You don't get a coach sacked then move on to another club.

The hope is that the push came from others and he's not entirely comfortable with it. If that's the case we'd be some chance of working a trade.

_________________
Well done boys!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
MatthewBoydFanClub 



Joined: 12 Feb 2007
Location: Elwood

PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:15 am
Post subject: Re: Bucks and DangerfieldReply with quote

kymbo5@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Many here are speculating on the possible trade re Beams and how it might get Dangerfield to Collingwood.

I don't know of course, but I doubt Buckley would want Dangerfield after he was heavily involved/responsible in the Sanderson sacking. Kinda like bringing in a 'rat pack" player?? Of course, there is the loyalty to his best mate which might play a part too, albeit it a business decision admittedly.

I suspect that Sanderson's sacking had more to do with members on the Adelaide board, than any discontent among the Adelaide players. Adelaide will regret their decision and that's their problem. If their situation leads to unrest and motivates Dangerfield wanting to leave Adelaide then Collingwood would be a great home for Dangerfield.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Captain_MyCaptain Leo



Joined: 25 May 2006
Location: home

PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 2:16 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Ricciuto had a fair bit to do with Sanderson's sacking, so I'm told.
_________________
The window is open my friend!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Podpicken Cancer



Joined: 28 Oct 2006


PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 7:48 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Dangerfield had nothing to do with Sanderson's sacking. You're closer to the mark BucksIsFutureCoach.

Would love Dangerfield at collingwood.

_________________
Billy Picken, the great No. 25 in the sky!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
AN_Inkling 



Joined: 06 Oct 2007


PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 7:51 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

^^Let's hope you're right and that Paddy is P'd. If we could get him it would potentially be an upgrade on Beams.
_________________
Well done boys!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
kymbo5@yahoo.com.au 



Joined: 23 Mar 2014


PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 7:51 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Podpicken wrote:
Dangerfield had nothing to do with Sanderson's sacking. You're closer to the mark BucksIsFutureCoach.

Would love Dangerfield at collingwood.


I'd rather have Rockliff if there was a choice of course.

_________________
kymbo
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
makri Capricorn



Joined: 29 Oct 2005
Location: Clifton Hill

PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:41 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

If Dangerfield did have anything to do with Sanderson getting sacked it's unlikely that he would then come here and play under one of Sanderson's best mates.
_________________
Magpie Jumper Gallery:
https://www.instagram.com/magpiejumpers/
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
RudeBoy 



Joined: 28 Nov 2005


PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:03 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

makri wrote:
If Dangerfield did have anything to do with Sanderson getting sacked it's unlikely that he would then come here and play under one of Sanderson's best mates.


Especially if Sanderson is one of Buck's assistants. Wink
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
swoop42 Virgo

Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?


Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Location: The 18

PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:19 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Losing Beams and getting Dangerfield using the Beams compensation should be the first option we try.

Get him to agree to our offer and we're half way there with the implied threat that he'll leave for the pies at the end of 2015 if a trade isn't done.

Pick 4 and a player off the Brisbane list that suits there needs and one there prepared to trade would be better compensation that what they'll receive via free agency.

Replace Beams immediately with Dangerfield and our hopes in the short term suddenly don't seem so bleak.

About time Ed pulled off another Malthouse style coup.

_________________
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
kymbo5@yahoo.com.au 



Joined: 23 Mar 2014


PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:44 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

swoop42 wrote:
Losing Beams and getting Dangerfield using the Beams compensation should be the first option we try.

Get him to agree to our offer and we're half way there with the implied threat that he'll leave for the pies at the end of 2015 if a trade isn't done.

Pick 4 and a player off the Brisbane list that suits there needs and one there prepared to trade would be better compensation that what they'll receive via free agency.

Replace Beams immediately with Dangerfield and our hopes in the short term suddenly don't seem so bleak.

About time Ed pulled off another Malthouse style coup.


Adelaide's recent professionalism means they'll probably offer us former number 1 pick Richard Tambling!

_________________
kymbo
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Flashman 



Joined: 11 Aug 2007


PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:08 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

swoop42 wrote:
Losing Beams and getting Dangerfield using the Beams compensation should be the first option we try.

Get him to agree to our offer and we're half way there with the implied threat that he'll leave for the pies at the end of 2015 if a trade isn't done.

Pick 4 and a player off the Brisbane list that suits there needs and one there prepared to trade would be better compensation that what they'll receive via free agency.

Replace Beams immediately with Dangerfield and our hopes in the short term suddenly don't seem so bleak.

About time Ed pulled off another Malthouse style coup.

I know I pooh poohed us ever getting Dangerfield in another thread but with the Beams situation arising the notion isn't as far fetched as it once was.

I doubt it will happen but if the club don't at least throw an offer out there re orchestrating a 3 way trade then I'd be surprised.

As great as getting Dangerfield the player is, in light of the year we've had on field and the discontent festering off, it would almost be as much of a coup for the clubs public relations.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
doriswilgus 



Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Location: the great southern land

PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:17 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Is Dangerfield a Victorian?I don't know much about him,except that he's a damn good player.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Beast 



Joined: 26 Oct 2011


PostPosted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Bucks and DangerfieldReply with quote

kymbo5@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Many here are speculating on the possible trade re Beams and how it might get Dangerfield to Collingwood.

I don't know of course, but I doubt Buckley would want Dangerfield after he was heavily involved/responsible in the Sanderson sacking. Kinda like bringing in a 'rat pack" player?? Of course, there is the loyalty to his best mate which might play a part too, albeit it a business decision admittedly.

Why not, makes as much sense as bringing in Clark who by all reports (I'm led to believe his depression is only a part of the whole picture) is exactly the sort Bucks should stay away from.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Warnings : 1 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> The Draft & Trade Moot (DTM) forum All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group