| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SteveH67
Joined: 18 Jul 2004
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
| Post subject: Re: Goldsack to remain a Pie after meeting with Bucks |  |
|
Which "perceptive fellow" would they be?
Goldy is a popular player at the Pies, I doubt more than a handful of fans would have wanted him to leave.
Goldy will be a Pies player for life!
 |
|
|
|
 |
stui magpie 
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| skaman wrote: | Surely this cant be so. Arnt all the players unhappy at Collingwood and disillusioned with Bucks as coach?
Onya Sack!  |
Snap. Love the Sack, have done since day 1. Manic Cnut who gives 100% every time.
Guess not everyone hates Bucks. 
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
September Zeros
Joined: 04 Oct 2012
Location: Behind you
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Defender wrote: | | "perceptive fellow" aren't anti Goldsack. |
"perceptive fellow" missed the point......again.
_________________
No Pressure, No Diamonds
They used to be a happy team at hawthorn.
________________ |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| September Zeros wrote: | | Defender wrote: | | "perceptive fellow" aren't anti Goldsack. |
"perceptive fellow" missed the point......again. |
Err no... we didn't. We still go for the Pies.. just like people still want to play for the Pies... regardless of management...
_________________
All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!! |
|
|
|
|
SteveH67
Joined: 18 Jul 2004
Location: Canberra, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Just got this on my facebook feed.
Free agent, Tyson Goldack has signed a three-year deal with Collingwood, that'll keep him at the Pies util at least 2018. |
|
|
|
|
Magpietothemax 
magpietothemax
Joined: 28 Apr 2013
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Really stoked to hear that Goldie is staying. He is a a great asset to our team, and I am so happy to hear that he wants to play a major role in providing leadership for our young players. |
|
|
|
|
rocketronnie
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Location: Reservoir
|
| Post subject: | |
|
The meeting with Buckley would be to only announce the agreement reached between the club's negotiators and Tyson's management. Given that its a bit rich lauding a "triumph for Bucks" lol. Buckley would have little to do with the negotiation process apart from the final announcement to Goldsack.
_________________
"Only the weak believe that what they do in battle is who they are as men" - Thomas Marshall - "Ironclad". |
|
|
|
|
Albert Parker
Joined: 13 Dec 2012
|
| Post subject: | |
|
^ I think it is naive to believe that Buckley's influence doesn't extend to having a chat with players, letting them know when they are required, how he sees their careers moving forward as part of the contract extension process.
Senior coaches have a heavy influence on football clubs from list management, team selection, training and match day. I am sure Buck's role is not as heavy as Grant Thomas' was reputedly, but he would no doubt get involved in the process of retaining a required player.
Surely it is logical that if the club is trying to retain someone that a word from the club coach to tell them of his plans and how player X fits in forms a part?
Or does Bucks only get involved when he tells Chris Dawes that he can't guarantee him a game and Luke Ball that he should think about retiring and going out with a final game in front of home fans?
Bucks will be a lot more hands on than Mick, who got his assistants to tell a player his first game was coming up that week while he went off to the hair dressers.
_________________
One team, one dream - the Pies and this year's premiership |
|
|
|
|
woftam
I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| rocketronnie wrote: | | The meeting with Buckley would be to only announce the agreement reached between the club's negotiators and Tyson's management. Given that its a bit rich lauding a "triumph for Bucks" lol. Buckley would have little to do with the negotiation process apart from the final announcement to Goldsack. |
That's not right. Bucks would need to reassure players that they are part of the team moving forward. Bucks has given Goldy every chance to blossom. Even to the angst of some of the so called "perceptive fellow" that thought he should be dropped. If Bucks did not want him to be part of the team he wouldn't be signing a 3 year deal. At least try to be fair. |
|
|
|
|
yin-YANG
Joined: 03 Oct 2011
|
| Post subject: | |
|
His efforts are fantastic - certainly a leader at our club - great versatility which may be very handy next year and beyond!
I would like to see him go back more next year - especially if Reid and Cloke and White are up forward. I think his experience and tenacity are needed in the backline somewhere... He even covered Kennedy well when needed in the game against WC so he can play a role on KP backs if required.
I also think Goldy is our best bet at the kick-outs - atm I prefer him to Keefe and seemingly no-one else down back seems to want to do the kick-out duties!
_________________
Love us or Hate us... we are Collingwood - you can't ignore the Mighty Magpies!!! |
|
|
|
|
E
Joined: 05 May 2010
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| rocketronnie wrote: | | The meeting with Buckley would be to only announce the agreement reached between the club's negotiators and Tyson's management. Given that its a bit rich lauding a "triumph for Bucks" lol. Buckley would have little to do with the negotiation process apart from the final announcement to Goldsack. |
but its 100% buckleys fault when a player leaves. I think i get your logic here.......
_________________
Ohhh, the Premiership's a cakewalk ....... |
|
|
|
|
nomadjack
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Location: Essendon
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| rocketronnie wrote: | | The meeting with Buckley would be to only announce the agreement reached between the club's negotiators and Tyson's management. Given that its a bit rich lauding a "triumph for Bucks" lol. Buckley would have little to do with the negotiation process apart from the final announcement to Goldsack. |
Ah ok. So Buckley carries the shitcan for supposedly mismanaging Jolly's departure and for being at the heart of player unrest but gets no kudos for convincing Goldsack to stay or for three other of our emerging stars signing on...Nice work you... |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| E wrote: | | rocketronnie wrote: | | The meeting with Buckley would be to only announce the agreement reached between the club's negotiators and Tyson's management. Given that its a bit rich lauding a "triumph for Bucks" lol. Buckley would have little to do with the negotiation process apart from the final announcement to Goldsack. |
but its 100% buckleys fault when a player leaves. I think i get your logic here....... |
The good old have cake and eat it too logic.
_________________
Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
the fuzz
Fuzz loves Bruzz
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Yes! The SACK!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| rocketronnie wrote: | | The meeting with Buckley would be to only announce the agreement reached between the club's negotiators and Tyson's management. Given that its a bit rich lauding a "triumph for Bucks" lol. Buckley would have little to do with the negotiation process apart from the final announcement to Goldsack. |
So let me get this right. When players decide to leave it's because they hate Bucks, but when a player commits to stay at Collingwood after a meeting with Bucks, it's got nothing to do with Bucks??? Ummm.....whatever.  |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
