Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Is Cloke overpaid based on his contribution to the team?

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion
 
Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SteveH67 



Joined: 18 Jul 2004
Location: Canberra, Australia

PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:38 pm
Post subject: Is Cloke overpaid based on his contribution to the team?Reply with quote

Not wanting to constantly rag on the guy, but I feel we got forced into paying him what he wanted because we had no other Key Position Forward coming through and there was nothing else out in the market.

It's meant he takes too much of a chunk, out of our Salary Cap, therefore we cannot chase another top dollar Key Position Forward who comes up in the Free Agency.

I love Clokey, I just think he isn't worth they money we have invested in him.


Last edited by SteveH67 on Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:48 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
rocketronnie 



Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Location: Reservoir

PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:43 pm
Post subject: Re: Is Cloke overpaid based on his contribution to the team?Reply with quote

SteveH67 wrote:
Not wanting to constantly rag on the guy, but I feel we got forced into paying him what he wanted because we had no other Key Forward coming through and their was nothing else out in the market.

It's meant he takes too much of chunk out of our Salary Cap, therefore we cannot chase another top dollar key forward who comes up in the Free Agency.

I love Clokey, I just think isn't worth they money we outlayed on him.


If Cloke had something like consistent and good quality delivery, and a cogent forward line plan to work in, you might be seeing different results from him and therefore not felt the need to start a thread like this.

_________________
"Only the weak believe that what they do in battle is who they are as men" - Thomas Marshall - "Ironclad".
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Wokko Pisces

Come and take it.


Joined: 04 Oct 2005


PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:46 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Cloke has three things that mess him up.

1. Piss poor midfield delivery, constantly kicking it to his feet, over his head or a dinky little lob/bomb onto his head when there are 2-3 defenders on him.

2. Playing an ineffective loose man. This leads to the opposition coach able to play their spare man on Cloke.

3. An obsession with wrestling the defender instead of leading.

When he's able to lead into space, he's unstoppable. When he's 1 on 1 and bodied up, he's great but still struggles a bit. That's my inexpert analysis anyway.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
roar 



Joined: 01 Sep 2004


PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:32 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Hasn't had it easy this year due to crappy delivery and the usual hard deal from umps, but he's been way down on form regardless. Unfortunately he ain't the only one that falls into that category.
_________________
kill for collingwood!
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
WarrenerraW 



Joined: 18 Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne

PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:37 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I actually feel sorry for him even though he's not always great in front of goal. He will always give a contest and 9/10 will mark it, but fact is the delivery to him is a national disgrace so what hope does he have when it's kicked at his feet, over his head or to his side? I would love it if he could execute a bit better but our midfield need to step up and take responsibility too. It's not all him. I can understand Cloke dropping his head and wanting to give up. He also gets a right royal shafting from the scumps too which doesn't help his cause.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
rand corp 



Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: south east asia

PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:44 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

The main problem with Travis this year has been the lack of other genuine goal kicking threats in the forward line. Seriously, no Cloke, no Elliot then no goals Collingwood.

White has been very poor

Reid can't get on the park

Trav has played deep and is not being used as the lead up forward

Blair, Goldy, Caff are defensive forwards who do not even threaten to kick bags when forward.

No genuine crumbing silk

No tall threats other than one man Cloke

Broomhead is a breath of fresh air and he and Elliot could be the makings of a formidable pair of forward flankers.

I would have liked to have seen Kennedy given more opportunity in the FP running in at the front of Cloke's feet to the contest.

Karnezis and Fasolo have not been able to reach elite fitness all year and play a hand.

Cloke has been the lone tall forward option to goal, nothing from White, nothing from Reid. Gault and Moore might be our future as the tall forwards and at the moment that looks a long way off.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
eddiesmith Taurus

Lets get ready to Rumble


Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Location: Lexus Centre

PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:59 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

But we are getting so much more value out of Dane Swan this year who is on more money...
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Prometheus Virgo



Joined: 21 May 2007


PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 9:49 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

They should try playing Cloke at Centre Half Back !
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
Big T 



Joined: 18 Oct 2003
Location: Torino, Italy

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 11:48 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I am with Eddiesmith on this one. We may have the regular stoush over Cloke and his goal kicking, Maxy and sideys value, but i would never question his pay. He took unders to stay, fact. He gets screwed by the umpires every week, fact. He does it all alone because those other talks around him are either soft or broken, fact.

Cloke is worth every cent.

Reid, on the other hand, if that boy can't get his body right, there's a huge investment that we should be worrying about.

But Eddie, why the cheap shot on one of our greatest ever players? Swanny is well above your pitiful cheap shots.

_________________
Buon Giorno
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
SuperStar Beams Gemini



Joined: 25 Sep 2009


PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:06 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

He would be getting paid about right or to me even unders.

1. Delivery to him is rubbish majority of the time never putting it into a dangerous position for him to mark it rather than to the advantage of his opponent.

2. Not having 3 talls in fwd killed him, he always had 2-3 on him, when Reid came back a fwd line of him, Reid and White made Cloke more dangerous and we saw that, kicked a cpl bags of 3.

3. He will create a contest 9/10 times when the ball comes his way, meaning if he wont mark it he will bring the ball to ground, unfortunately we dont have smart crumbers at the bottom of the pack

4. This is where he is massively underrated he is the general of our forward. He helps marshall the troops in the fwd line and when his on fire more often than not the players around him stand taller.

These are 4 things you want in a key forward, if he was at a current top 4 team he would be killing teams
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger  
Dr Pie 

Dr Pie


Joined: 08 Nov 2007


PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:29 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Just to endorse others comments. Two things in particular have undermined Travis. First, he has been our only tall forward for most of the last three seasons. In 2010 and 2011, Cloke was supported up forward by Dawes and Leroy. Dawes didn't kick a huge number of goals but he was a good mark and the opponents had to put a tall defender on him so Cloke was rarely double teamed. Then Dawes injured his hand (finger) and Bucks tried to turn him into a second ruck and one way or another Dawes' form and confidence declined and he was gone by the end of the season. Then followed the failed experiments with Lynch and White and also an attempt to Reid as a forward which would have worked if Reid could have played more than five games in a row without injury. For the last three years Cloke has been double teamed in the majority of games.

The second thing that undermined Cloke was the injuries and loss of form and ultimately delisting (Krak) and defection (Daisy) of our two best deliverers of the ball, Andrew Krakouer and Daisy Thomas. Apart from Pendlebury these two were the most reliable sources of ball to Cloke.

If we had a quality second tall forward and if some of our midfielders could improve their passing Travis would again be the weapon he used to be.

_________________
Born and raised in Black and White
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
watt price tully Scorpio



Joined: 15 May 2007


PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:44 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Dr Pie wrote:
Just to endorse others comments. Two things in particular have undermined Travis. First, he has been our only tall forward for most of the last three seasons. In 2010 and 2011, Cloke was supported up forward by Dawes and Leroy. Dawes didn't kick a huge number of goals but he was a good mark and the opponents had to put a tall defender on him so Cloke was rarely double teamed. Then Dawes injured his hand (finger) and Bucks tried to turn him into a second ruck and one way or another Dawes' form and confidence declined and he was gone by the end of the season. Then followed the failed experiments with Lynch and White and also an attempt to Reid as a forward which would have worked if Reid could have played more than five games in a row without injury. For the last three years Cloke has been double teamed in the majority of games.

The second thing that undermined Cloke was the injuries and loss of form and ultimately delisting (Krak) and defection (Daisy) of our two best deliverers of the ball, Andrew Krakouer and Daisy Thomas. Apart from Pendlebury these two were the most reliable sources of ball to Cloke.

If we had a quality second tall forward and if some of our midfielders could improve their passing Travis would again be the weapon he used to be.


Allow me to introduce you (in 2015) to:

1. Tim Broomhead
2. Ben Kennedy
3. Josh Thomas
4. Marley Williams
5. Nathan Freeman
6. Paul Seedsman & of course from the half back line
7. Adam Oxley

Most of whom are pretty good kicks

_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Dr Pie 

Dr Pie


Joined: 08 Nov 2007


PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:57 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

watt price tully wrote:
Dr Pie wrote:
Just to endorse others comments. Two things in particular have undermined Travis. First, he has been our only tall forward for most of the last three seasons. In 2010 and 2011, Cloke was supported up forward by Dawes and Leroy. Dawes didn't kick a huge number of goals but he was a good mark and the opponents had to put a tall defender on him so Cloke was rarely double teamed. Then Dawes injured his hand (finger) and Bucks tried to turn him into a second ruck and one way or another Dawes' form and confidence declined and he was gone by the end of the season. Then followed the failed experiments with Lynch and White and also an attempt to Reid as a forward which would have worked if Reid could have played more than five games in a row without injury. For the last three years Cloke has been double teamed in the majority of games.

The second thing that undermined Cloke was the injuries and loss of form and ultimately delisting (Krak) and defection (Daisy) of our two best deliverers of the ball, Andrew Krakouer and Daisy Thomas. Apart from Pendlebury these two were the most reliable sources of ball to Cloke.

If we had a quality second tall forward and if some of our midfielders could improve their passing Travis would again be the weapon he used to be.


Allow me to introduce you (in 2015) to:

1. Tim Broomhead
2. Ben Kennedy
3. Josh Thomas
4. Marley Williams
5. Nathan Freeman
6. Paul Seedsman & of course from the half back line
7. Adam Oxley

Most of whom are pretty good kicks


You are right about Broomhead and Kennedy. Despite a great game last Saturday, I have seen Josh miss quite a few targets in the past. It is only in the last two weeks that Marley has played far enough up the field to be a supplier to Cloke (and of course Cloke wasn't there at the time). Haven't seen enough of Freeman and Oxley to comment. I love Seedsman's game just as I love Heritier's game both of them are great kicks for length and speed of delivery and neither of them are particularly reliable for accuracy of delivery.

_________________
Born and raised in Black and White
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
derkd 



Joined: 29 May 2013


PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:11 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Wokko wrote:
Cloke has three things that mess him up.

1. Piss poor midfield delivery, constantly kicking it to his feet, over his head or a dinky little lob/bomb onto his head when there are 2-3 defenders on him.

2. Playing an ineffective loose man. This leads to the opposition coach able to play their spare man on Cloke.

3. An obsession with wrestling the defender instead of leading.

When he's able to lead into space, he's unstoppable. When he's 1 on 1 and bodied up, he's great but still struggles a bit. That's my inexpert analysis anyway.


4. He is not a great kick lol.....if we had a Colemen medal for the most behinds kicked, he would win.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
derkd 



Joined: 29 May 2013


PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 12:16 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

I will say this, i agree, the delivery too him has been awful. He is also now in a younge team still learning the ropes. The problem is he is now..28? even if the sides learn the ropes quick...he will be 30...almost past it. Take the emotive argum,ents aiside and look at the pure 'value' aspect. Would it be worth tradeing him while he has currency freeing up the cash/picks to go after someone who will be in the age catogry to go with the youngsters in our team?
_________________
"To know nothing of events before your birth, is to forever remain a child" - Cicero (Roman Lawyer/Senator) 46 BCE.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group