|
|
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
What'sinaname
Joined: 29 May 2010 Location: Living rent free
|
Post subject: | |
|
Abbott is the most effective Labor Leader in decades. _________________ Fighting against the objectification of woman. |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005 Location: In flagrante delicto
|
Post subject: | |
|
What'sinaname wrote: | Abbott is the most effective Labor Leader in decades. |
He's proven to be an excellent opposition leader.
While the Libs were in opposition he did a great job, now that they're in government he's still a more effective opposition leader than Shorten. _________________ Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Wokko
Come and take it.
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
|
Post subject: | |
|
stui magpie wrote: | What'sinaname wrote: | Abbott is the most effective Labor Leader in decades. |
He's proven to be an excellent opposition leader.
While the Libs were in opposition he did a great job, now that they're in government he's still a more effective opposition leader than Shorten. |
Ha! He can't help himself... "MUST DESTROY GOVERNMENT" |
|
|
|
|
nomadjack
Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Location: Essendon
|
Post subject: | |
|
⬆very nice work that...😁😁😁 |
|
|
|
|
Lazza
Joined: 04 Feb 2003 Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
Post subject: | |
|
watt price tully wrote: | Mugwump wrote: | watt price tully wrote: | The RDNS are funded in part by the Feds, not in full. The redesign, restructure us not occurring because funding is good. The Feds have fkd over health big time as well as the lot just turfed out in Vic. RDNS is merely one example of how nasty this government is when it comes to health.
Just raise the levy another 1% it is a relatively progressive tax & will not hurt those who can least afford to pay.
Costello (read Howard) f•cked this up with the unnecessary tax cuts to the wealthy & relatively well off.
The NGO sector. & the aged sector has been rogered by these current f•ckers. Speak to people on the field & you'll find the mad monk is a mad & nasty fu•k , ideological fundamentalists.
(On my iPhone so hard to write) |
I've no idea whether that's true or not, or whether this restructure is justified. But I always wonder at the assumption that the present level of government funding can never, it seems, be reduced, and thus it is always either perfectly right where it is, or it's not enough. Maybe, in areas managed by government, our desire for services always exceeds our preparedness to pay. |
Ahem: Population growth & as I noted this isn't occurring in a vacuum, there are massive cuts to services.
Your question & points indicate that demand is static & occurs in a vacuum. The gobal picture here is cuts, cuts & more cuts in the way services are funded & provided: The points I've made are beyond dispute, they are the reality. Later when I get some time I'll detail how the funding model in aged care has impacted adversely on services & service provision merely to fit ideological outcomes. |
Exactly right. Then when you have further time, look at how disability services and accommodation services for the disabled have been cut to the bone. The only "safe" welfare area that uis protected is child protection due to its highly public profile politically. _________________ Don't confuse your current path with your final destination. Just because it's dark and stormy now doesn't meant that you aren't headed for glorious sunshine! |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Please specify location. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|