| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MagpieBat
Joined: 27 Nov 2010
Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| delcorp wrote: | | Scharenberg what is his status. |
Just quietly, but there was some chatter over on another board that he will be right to go in the VFL on or about Queen's Birthday weekend... |
|
|
|
 |
delcorp
Joined: 03 Oct 2005
Location: Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Good, What would happen to Frost then? |
|
|
|
|
MagpieBat
Joined: 27 Nov 2010
Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| delcorp wrote: | | Good, What would happen to Frost then? |
He would lose his place on the list and return to the rookie list.
However, AFL rules allow clubs to elevate a rookie mid-season, without the need for a Long Term Injury. Frost could be re-elevated to the senior list under that rule if we need him.
Given his form of late, that is almost a fait accompli... |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Edit: you mean in relation to his spot on the list. Ok, what the bat said then. We'll certainly elevate Frost at the first opportunity.
_________________
Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
swoop42 
Whatcha gonna do when he comes for you?
Joined: 02 Aug 2008
Location: The 18
|
| Post subject: | |
|
^Scharenberg wont be back until we can upgrade Frost mid season that much is sure.
_________________
He's mad. He's bad. He's MaynHARD! |
|
|
|
|
piedys 
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003
Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
So, if Lynch has a definate break to his leg, he can be placed on long-term injury list, and Martin or Frost elevated in his place?
Dyso
_________________
M I L L A N E 4 2 forever |
|
|
|
|
MagpieBat
Joined: 27 Nov 2010
Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| piedys wrote: | So, if Lynch has a definate break to his leg, he can be placed on long-term injury list, and Martin or Frost elevated in his place?
Dyso |
Correct. |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003
Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MagpieBat wrote: | | piedys wrote: | So, if Lynch has a definate break to his leg, he can be placed on long-term injury list, and Martin or Frost elevated in his place?
Dyso |
Correct. |
So if Gault is cactus too, as reported in url below, what is his status?
Is he senior or rookie list?
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-04-26/around-the-state-leagues-vickery-in-form
Despite Martin's goal haul today, Frost would take precedence due to his form i expect? |
|
|
|
|
MagpieBat
Joined: 27 Nov 2010
Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| piedys wrote: | | MagpieBat wrote: | | piedys wrote: | So, if Lynch has a definate break to his leg, he can be placed on long-term injury list, and Martin or Frost elevated in his place?
Dyso |
Correct. |
So if Gault is cactus too, as reported in url below, what is his status?
Is he senior or rookie list?
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-04-26/around-the-state-leagues-vickery-in-form
Despite Martin's goal haul today, Frost would take precedence due to his form i expect? |
Gault is rookie list. In the context of this discussion, he is irrelevant.
Frost probably would take precedence. However, in addition to being able to upgrade rookies for long term injured players, the AFL allows clubs to upgrade 1 rookie during the middle of the year without the need for a long term injury.
Put Lynch on the LTI list and you would have 2 spots open. In effect, you could upgrade both. |
|
|
|
|
AN_Inkling
Joined: 06 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Frost is currently on the senior list in replace of Scharenberg.
We also have an upgrade available mid-season (round 12?). I doubt Scharenberg will be playing seniors by then, so this can be used on Frost.
With Lynch now seemingly on the LTI, we could also promote another player. Martin, if he was considered ready to be selected.
_________________
Well done boys! |
|
|
|
|
piedys
Heeeeeeere's Dyso!!!
Joined: 04 Sep 2003
Location: Resident Forum Psychopath since 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| MagpieBat wrote: | | piedys wrote: | | MagpieBat wrote: | | piedys wrote: | So, if Lynch has a definate break to his leg, he can be placed on long-term injury list, and Martin or Frost elevated in his place?
Dyso |
Correct. |
So if Gault is cactus too, as reported in url below, what is his status?
Is he senior or rookie list?
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-04-26/around-the-state-leagues-vickery-in-form
Despite Martin's goal haul today, Frost would take precedence due to his form i expect? |
Gault is rookie list. In the context of this discussion, he is irrelevant.
Frost probably would take precedence. However, in addition to being able to upgrade rookies for long term injured players, the AFL allows clubs to upgrade 1 rookie during the middle of the year without the need for a long term injury.
Put Lynch on the LTI list and you would have 2 spots open. In effect, you could upgrade both. |
Excellent MB, glad you have got your head around it, so i can pick your brain!  I will keep a lookout for an official announcement from the Club this week, as soon as Lynchy is declared by the coroner. 
Dyso |
|
|
|
|
jackcass 
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| piedys wrote: | So, if Lynch has a definate break to his leg, he can be placed on long-term injury list, and Martin or Frost elevated in his place?
Dyso |
Would need to be assessed as an 8 week injury to warrant adding to the LTI list but could work in theory. |
|
|
|
|
MagpieBat
Joined: 27 Nov 2010
Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| piedys wrote: | | MagpieBat wrote: | | piedys wrote: | | MagpieBat wrote: | | piedys wrote: | So, if Lynch has a definate break to his leg, he can be placed on long-term injury list, and Martin or Frost elevated in his place?
Dyso |
Correct. |
So if Gault is cactus too, as reported in url below, what is his status?
Is he senior or rookie list?
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-04-26/around-the-state-leagues-vickery-in-form
Despite Martin's goal haul today, Frost would take precedence due to his form i expect? |
Gault is rookie list. In the context of this discussion, he is irrelevant.
Frost probably would take precedence. However, in addition to being able to upgrade rookies for long term injured players, the AFL allows clubs to upgrade 1 rookie during the middle of the year without the need for a long term injury.
Put Lynch on the LTI list and you would have 2 spots open. In effect, you could upgrade both. |
Excellent MB, glad you have got your head around it, so i can pick your brain! I will keep a lookout for an official announcement from the Club this week, as soon as Lynchy is declared by the coroner.
Dyso |
I'm glad I can be of use, Dyso. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
