| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
I'm sensing we will play Witts to assist Grundy, given the 2 rucks used by the Cats. I hope this doesn't make us top heavy, but I think the use of Witts will be horses for courses this year.
Ins: Keeffe, Fasolo, Witts
Outs: Brown (inj), Sinclair (inj), Dwyer (unlucky) |
|
|
|
 |
jackcass 
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| I'm with you on the Ins, not sure if it'll be Dwyer or Goldsack who'll make way. Time will tell. |
|
|
|
|
roar
Joined: 01 Sep 2004
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Agree. Perhaps Blair. Biggest player for smallest.
_________________
kill for collingwood! |
|
|
|
|
King Malta 
RIP Flip
Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Location: Gettin' Wiggy
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Will be pretty annoyed in Dwyer went, exactly the sort of player we need at the moment; clean skills and very good under pressure. |
|
|
|
|
RudeBoy
Joined: 28 Nov 2005
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| King Malta wrote: | | Will be pretty annoyed in Dwyer went, exactly the sort of player we need at the moment; clean skills and very good under pressure. |
Personally I would drop Ball, but I can't see that happening. Goldsack probably did just enough (2 important goals) to keep his spot. Langdon will keep his spot because we can't disrupt the backline any more after losing Brown and Sinkers. Blair's in and under pressure and presence up forward should secure his spot.
So Dwyer would be unlucky, but I reckon he's the most likely to miss. |
|
|
|
|
King Malta
RIP Flip
Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Location: Gettin' Wiggy
|
| Post subject: | |
|
All fair points really. That's assuming they'll want to squeeze Witts in rather than rolling with Grundy, Keefe and White though.
I too would probably have thought about dropping Ball but his experience may be useful in this game. Even with all our injuries I don't envy the selection committee here. |
|
|
|
|
Stupied
Joined: 14 Mar 2013
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I love Bally, but he needs a spell in the twos to get his mojo back I reckon. His set shots for goals so far this season have been nothing short of horrific. Adams will be a suitable replacement for him at the bottom of the packs.
I will spew if Dwyer is dropped. Yeah he was quiet last week, but what I did see of him was quality, and he will only get better as his match fitness improves. |
|
|
|
|
neil 
Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Location: Queensland
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Is Dwyers match fitness good enough for a whole game or will he be the sub?
_________________
Carlscum 120 years being cheating scum |
|
|
|
|
Big T
Joined: 18 Oct 2003
Location: Torino, Italy
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Stupied wrote: | I love Bally, but he needs a spell in the twos to get his mojo back I reckon. His set shots for goals so far this season have been nothing short of horrific. Adams will be a suitable replacement for him at the bottom of the packs.
I will spew if Dwyer is dropped. Yeah he was quiet last week, but what I did see of him was quality, and he will only get better as his match fitness improves. |
Disagree. Just keep him away from goal or dish it off. Still critical in the clinches.
_________________
Buon Giorno |
|
|
|
|
MagpieMad
One in, All in!!
Joined: 15 Jan 2001
Location: -37.798563,144.996641
|
| Post subject: | |
|
mattys123′s Match Preview Round 3 � Collingwood vs Geelong Match Preview is up on the Site
http://www.magpies.net/nick/?p=1454
Thanks Matt
_________________
Pain heals, Chicks dig scars, Glory..... lasts forever! |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Suggested elsewhere Ball might be at risk of being dropped... just the thought though leaves a bad taste in my mouth... of all the options being bandied about though, he's the most easily covered. |
|
|
|
|
uncanny
Joined: 04 Mar 2014
Location: Castlemaine
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Yes!
Since Bucks took over we have prevailed against the cats.
When someone says he can't coach compared to mm I just remember that...
Not that I want to remember...
Didak playing injured as full forward til after the game is over then ok let's give Fas a run...
or....
no relief for an injured Reid on Hawkins and the damage is done
How could they lose after JPod went off injured?
BucKs can't coach as good as mm?? Give me a break
Our hassle and spirit has always worried the cats. No Krakouer this time but Dwyer is still out there. They were our best two last time. Someone(s) else will step in and give Sam a hand to give them a long trip home to sleepy hollow
In Keefe Fasolo
Out Brown Sinclair
go woodsmen
_________________
woodsmen rule |
|
|
|
|
Neil Appleby 
Joined: 11 Feb 1998
Location: Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| perthmagpie wrote: | Don't have to worry about stopping Motlop or Christensen as they are injured. Gotta hold Hawkins, Bartel, Johnson, Selwood and the usual suspects. My changes would be:
In: Keeefe, Fasolo
Out: Langdon, Brown.
Langdon unlucky but we seriously need to add at least one quality finisher to the side and that man is Fasolo. Other options are also bring in Thomas and Kennedy. |
What's that you say? Fasolo for Langdon? Wow. So you reckon a lazy, show-pony with no defensive mind-set is a better bet than a brave, skillful young bloke who hasn't put a foot wrong? Langdon may well lose his spot as fatigue sets in, but I doubt it will be to Fasolo and I doubt it will be this week; the boy's earned at least another run. Faz needs another month in Ben Hart's School of Defence in my opinion. I like the idea of a quality finisher on our backline and maybe Faz can be that person, but not yet.
_________________
After the epic draw comes the decisive knockout!
Collingwood rules the world again and Mick Malthouse fulfils his destiny with the twenty ten premiership and can you hear the people sing! |
|
|
|
|
watt price tully 
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Who does Caff tag this week? I'd like to see him on Bartel.
I would like to see Kennedy in, Keefe will come in for sure & I suspect they will bring in Fasolo.
The outs: (BSB) Brown, Sinclair & Ball
Ball is a difficult one because he is so good in & under, does some really tough stuff that is often overlooked. However, he's been sadly off the pace so far this year & his forward work has been so wasteful that he's becoming a liability.
_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
|
slydog81
Joined: 05 Sep 2011
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Ball out? no chance even though I agree he has been average so far but so has Swanny.
Caff must tag Selwood.
_________________
We're always up to mischief! |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
