View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
roar
Joined: 01 Sep 2004
|
Post subject: | |
|
SuperStar Beams wrote: | Sinclair was good for us and moving to him to the backline was the best choice for him. He is best 22 for us even with Williams. I would imagine our back line looking like this
FB: Sinclair Brown Toovey
HB: Williams Keefe Reid/Young/Seedsman
|
4 of your back 6 have poor to average disposal, which isn't good enough, IMO. _________________ kill for collingwood! |
|
|
|
|
King Malta
RIP Flip
Joined: 24 Mar 2008 Location: Gettin' Wiggy
|
Post subject: | |
|
Always been a big fan of Sinkers and was impressed with him on Friday, busted his ass for the stripes and was one of the only players who could hold his head somewhat high on the night.
I also don't understand the flogging of his disposal, he was disposing of it at around 75% last season, nothing wrong with that. |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 Location: Bendigo
|
Post subject: | |
|
King Malta wrote: | Always been a big fan of Sinkers and was impressed with him on Friday, busted his ass for the stripes and was one of the only players who could hold his head somewhat high on the night.
I also don't understand the flogging of his disposal, he was disposing of it at around 75% last season, nothing wrong with that. |
Missed a couple of goals early in his career and some people just can't move on. |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
jackcass wrote: | King Malta wrote: | Always been a big fan of Sinkers and was impressed with him on Friday, busted his ass for the stripes and was one of the only players who could hold his head somewhat high on the night.
I also don't understand the flogging of his disposal, he was disposing of it at around 75% last season, nothing wrong with that. |
Missed a couple of goals early in his career and some people just can't move on. |
Yep yep yep yep yep yep
Glad his names not cloke _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
MagpieBat wrote: | He's best 22 so long as Marley is out, but ideally he's not in our best 30 players. |
you are going to be stuck with watching him for a while. he is best 22. he reads the play well. he knows where the footy is, how to get the footy and to keep it moving forward. he will get better and better as his body continues to grow. _________________ Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
MagpieBat
Joined: 27 Nov 2010 Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
|
Post subject: | |
|
John Wren wrote: | MagpieBat wrote: | He's best 22 so long as Marley is out, but ideally he's not in our best 30 players. |
you are going to be stuck with watching him for a while. he is best 22. he reads the play well. he knows where the footy is, how to get the footy and to keep it moving forward. he will get better and better as his body continues to grow. |
So long as Buckley is coach, yeah he is, particularly with Marley absent.
But I stand by my contention that he is not a best 22 player with everyone available. |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Is that what you think? |
|
|
|
|
MagpieBat
Joined: 27 Nov 2010 Location: Brooding in a cave... somewhere... maybe...
|
Post subject: | |
|
roar wrote: | SuperStar Beams wrote: | Sinclair was good for us and moving to him to the backline was the best choice for him. He is best 22 for us even with Williams. I would imagine our back line looking like this
FB: Sinclair Brown Toovey
HB: Williams Keefe Reid/Young/Seedsman
|
4 of your back 6 have poor to average disposal, which isn't good enough, IMO. |
This.
Particularly given the brand of football Buckley wants us to play.
Ideally you'd have Sinclair out of there for another defensive small with better kicking prowess (maybe Ramsay or Broomhead). Or perhaps for a Scharenberg and have Toovey play smaller. You'd definitely have Reid there, especially as a spare man, which would require us to abandon this notion of sending the +1 to the contest.
That way, you would have 3 or 4 reliable outlets by foot (Keeffe, Seedsman, Reid, Scharenberg/Ramsay/Broomhead). A wingman like Young dropping back makes it as many as 5. |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
SuperStar Beams wrote: | Sinclair was good for us and moving to him to the backline was the best choice for him. He is best 22 for us even with Williams. I would imagine our back line looking like this
FB: Sinclair Brown Toovey
HB: Williams Keefe Reid/Young/Seedsman
While Williams cant play it will be Young/Seedsman/Reid and Maxwell in those final 2 spots |
i'd be running young/seedsman off the half back flank or wing. fasolo to move back forward eventually.
the back half would consist of sinclair, brown, williams, toovey, keeffe, young, seedsman and harryl plus a midfielder or two for cover. _________________ Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
djjim
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
|
Post subject: | |
|
Lolvu guys must all be brain dead sinclear is the biggest dud playing afl the most basic skill is 2 kick and he cant if use think he is our future thats why we got smashed rd 1 and many more 2 come big discrase wearing the black and white |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Or what? |
|
|
|
|
Breadcrawl
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
One of the reasons we will suddenly turn into a seriously good football team as the year progresses and he starts to realise that he is a fair dinkum AFL player _________________ they can smell what we're cookin' |
|
|
|
|
John Wren
"Look after the game. It means so much to so many."
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
djjim wrote: | Lolvu guys must all be brain dead sinclear is the biggest dud playing afl the most basic skill is 2 kick and he cant if use think he is our future thats why we got smashed rd 1 and many more 2 come big discrase wearing the black and white |
come back when you have learned to write english. this appears to be on a par of where you rate sinclair. _________________ Purveyor of sanctimonious twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
Piethagoras' Theorem
the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk
Joined: 29 May 2006
|
Post subject: | |
|
I agree with Sonic Animation, re djays _________________ Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood. |
|
|
|
|
think positive
Side By Side
Joined: 30 Jun 2005 Location: somewhere
|
Post subject: | |
|
djjim wrote: | Lolvu guys must all be brain dead sinclear is the biggest dud playing afl the most basic skill is 2 kick and he cant if use think he is our future thats why we got smashed rd 1 and many more 2 come big discrase wearing the black and white |
Wholly f&ck, I thought I was drinking early _________________ You cant fix stupid, turns out you cant quarantine it either! |
|
|
|
|
|