| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
PIES4LYF
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
As a star he has been over the years, the fact that we delisted Dids there is no way we can take Chapman.
_________________
PIES IN 2015 |
|
|
|
 |
Neil Appleby 
Joined: 11 Feb 1998
Location: Melbourne
|
| Post subject: Chapman to Collingwood? | |
|
Heard on the radio tonight that Geelong is not offering Chappy a contract and that a couple of clubs are interested including Collingwood. Really Bucks? Geelong is moving him along to build its youth and we show interest.....why would we?
_________________
After the epic draw comes the decisive knockout!
Collingwood rules the world again and Mick Malthouse fulfils his destiny with the twenty ten premiership and can you hear the people sing! |
|
|
|
|
The Boy Who Cried Wolf
Joined: 26 Sep 2013
Location: We prefer free speech - you know it's right
|
| Post subject: Re: Chapman to Collingwood? | |
|
Sounds like crazy talk to me...?
_________________
All Aboard!! Choo Choo!!! |
|
|
|
|
Albert Parker
Joined: 13 Dec 2012
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Not happening when we move Didak and Jolly on. Usual lazy media - link to Collingwood
_________________
One team, one dream - the Pies and this year's premiership |
|
|
|
|
GreekLunatic
Joined: 22 Feb 2003
Location: doncaster vic australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Maybe dids had a fall out with bucks |
|
|
|
|
woftam 
I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Anything wrong with the other Chapman thread? |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw 
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
^^^ On an hypothetical (and unlikely) trade, the rule is that there have to be three basic threads and then, as each possible combination trade of players/picks is mooted, a new "I have heard ..." thread is created. Get with the program.  |
|
|
|
|
woftam
I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Pies4shaw wrote: | | ^^^ On an hypothetical (and unlikely) trade, the rule is that there have to be three basic threads and then, as each possible combination trade of players/picks is mooted, a new "I have heard ..." thread is created. Get with the program. |
Sorry my bad.  |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
