 |
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Pies4shaw 
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| Pies4shaw wrote: | | Paine ... crashed the packs, clunked some marks and kicked well. |
| jackcass wrote: | | Paine ... crashed a lot of packs, clunked some very good marks, and kicking was good. |
Snap!  |
|
|
|
 |
Dave The Man 
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Location: Someville, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Oxley was awsome in final QTR taking a few Contested Marks deep in Defense
_________________
I am Da Man |
|
|
|
|
Skids 
Quitting drinking will be one of the best choices you make in your life.
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
Location: Joined 3/6/02 . Member #175
|
| Post subject: | |
|
How did Dids go? Is he in the mix for a call up?
_________________
Don't count the days, make the days count. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| No. His skills were great, of course, but he really couldn't get his own ball and generally couldn't impact the contest. I really want to see him in the seniors but he really shouldn't be brought up after that game. |
|
|
|
|
Rick 
Joined: 11 May 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Collingwood 3.5, 9.9, 14.10, 18.12
Geelong 4.5, 9.7, 14.9, 16.11
Goals - Collingwood: Paine 5, Allan 3, Didak 3, Broomhead, Hellier, Richmond, Moloney, Martin, Yagmoor, Mooney
Geelong: Brown 4, Kersten 3, Murdoch 2, Bathie, Vardy, Corrigan, McFarlane, Burbury, Hartman, Gibbs
Best - Collingwood: Moloney, Paine, Hudson, Oxley, Didak, Heagney-Steart
Geelong: Sully, Corrigan, Brown, Murdoch, Gleeson, Simpson
So Martin had 35 possies and kicked a goal but wasn't in the best?!
Bucks said something interesting during a post match interview with Ch 7 that defensive efforts being rewarded with senior selection. That kinda makes sense with Sinclairs continual selection except for the last couple of weeks. While Sinclair does chase and harass, I don't see the rewards that we've gotten from similar types in Elliott and Dwyer. Sinclair to me is a cattle dog rounding up sheep and most times I think we may as well have a kelpie out there.
My point is, has Martin been as Pendles put it "a cheater"? I haven't watched any VFL games yet this year so I can't comment. Could this be the reason he hasn't been elevated yet? Could our VFL regulars shed some light... |
|
|
|
|
watt price tully
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Dave The Man wrote: | | Oxley was awsome in final QTR taking a few Contested Marks deep in Defense |
Saw the last qtr & a bit.
Oxley, wow can he mark under pressure. Highly impressive.
Sinclair intercepted a few & is a good mark for his size.
Paine like a few bigger guys after a mark takes too much time walking backwards on the mark & then looking for options - by this time he has missed leads etc. Needs more awareness IMO. (didn't see the first 2.5 qtrs).
Team looked good & combined well.
_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
|
woftam 
I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Rick wrote: | Collingwood 3.5, 9.9, 14.10, 18.12
Geelong 4.5, 9.7, 14.9, 16.11
Goals - Collingwood: Paine 5, Allan 3, Didak 3, Broomhead, Hellier, Richmond, Moloney, Martin, Yagmoor, Mooney
Geelong: Brown 4, Kersten 3, Murdoch 2, Bathie, Vardy, Corrigan, McFarlane, Burbury, Hartman, Gibbs
Best - Collingwood: Moloney, Paine, Hudson, Oxley, Didak, Heagney-Steart
Geelong: Sully, Corrigan, Brown, Murdoch, Gleeson, Simpson
So Martin had 35 possies and kicked a goal but wasn't in the best?!
Bucks said something interesting during a post match interview with Ch 7 that defensive efforts being rewarded with senior selection. That kinda makes sense with Sinclairs continual selection except for the last couple of weeks. While Sinclair does chase and harass, I don't see the rewards that we've gotten from similar types in Elliott and Dwyer. Sinclair to me is a cattle dog rounding up sheep and most times I think we may as well have a kelpie out there.
My point is, has Martin been as Pendles put it "a cheater"? I haven't watched any VFL games yet this year so I can't comment. Could this be the reason he hasn't been elevated yet? Could our VFL regulars shed some light... |
I don't know where they were getting the best players from. Didak wasn't one of the best despite 3 goals. Martin Moloney & Hudson were our 3 best by a mile. Oxley next despite Brown kicking a few on him. He fought back well in the last quarter. Paine was good as well with 5 goals & clunked a few good grabs. Rick I thought all our mids were pushing back to help the defenders. They played well. |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Rick wrote: | Collingwood 3.5, 9.9, 14.10, 18.12
Geelong 4.5, 9.7, 14.9, 16.11
Goals - Collingwood: Paine 5, Allan 3, Didak 3, Broomhead, Hellier, Richmond, Moloney, Martin, Yagmoor, Mooney
Geelong: Brown 4, Kersten 3, Murdoch 2, Bathie, Vardy, Corrigan, McFarlane, Burbury, Hartman, Gibbs
Best - Collingwood: Moloney, Paine, Hudson, Oxley, Didak, Heagney-Steart
Geelong: Sully, Corrigan, Brown, Murdoch, Gleeson, Simpson
So Martin had 35 possies and kicked a goal but wasn't in the best?!
Bucks said something interesting during a post match interview with Ch 7 that defensive efforts being rewarded with senior selection. That kinda makes sense with Sinclairs continual selection except for the last couple of weeks. While Sinclair does chase and harass, I don't see the rewards that we've gotten from similar types in Elliott and Dwyer. Sinclair to me is a cattle dog rounding up sheep and most times I think we may as well have a kelpie out there.
My point is, has Martin been as Pendles put it "a cheater"? I haven't watched any VFL games yet this year so I can't comment. Could this be the reason he hasn't been elevated yet? Could our VFL regulars shed some light... |
Most of Martins work was done at the coalface in tight congested areas. He's relentless in his pursuit of the footy, clean with his disposal and appears to have good vision. Must be close to promotion you'd think. |
|
|
|
|
slydog81
Joined: 05 Sep 2011
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Martin will get the mid season upgrade surely, although oxley is in a position where we have some issues and has been playing well.
From what I saw on the weekend Paine should be close and dids has to get a game surely.
_________________
We're always up to mischief! |
|
|
|
|
slydog81
Joined: 05 Sep 2011
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Martin will get the mid season upgrade surely, although oxley is in a position where we have some issues and has been playing well.
From what I saw on the weekend Paine should be close and dids has to get a game surely.
_________________
We're always up to mischief! |
|
|
|
|
Lazza
Joined: 04 Feb 2003
Location: Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| slydog81 wrote: | Martin will get the mid season upgrade surely, although oxley is in a position where we have some issues and has been playing well.
From what I saw on the weekend Paine should be close and dids has to get a game surely. |
I'm amazed that BJ wasn't listed among the best players... 
He should be a walk up start for the seniors this week. |
|
|
|
|
Ev5Magpies 
Ev5Magpies
Joined: 05 Feb 2003
Location: Aspendale, Victoria
|
| Post subject: | |
|
What are people's thoughts on Tim Allan (No. 57 I think)?
Only playing as a top up player, but he is a good size & athletic.
Potential rookie list spot 2014?
_________________
Ohhhh the premierships a cakewalk for the good old COLLINGWOOD |
|
|
|
|
jackcass
Joined: 01 Mar 2005
Location: Bendigo
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Ev5Magpies wrote: | What are people's thoughts on Tim Allan (No. 57 I think)?
Only playing as a top up player, but he is a good size & athletic.
Potential rookie list spot 2014? |
Would be looking at Ferguson, Hellier, and Wallace before him. All midgets though. |
|
|
|
|
woftam
I used to be undecided, but now I'm not so sure.
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Location: Carum Downs, Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| jackcass wrote: | | Ev5Magpies wrote: | What are people's thoughts on Tim Allan (No. 57 I think)?
Only playing as a top up player, but he is a good size & athletic.
Potential rookie list spot 2014? |
Would be looking at Ferguson, Hellier, and Wallace before him. All midgets though. |
Would be looking at Moloney first I would have thought? |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| jackcass wrote: | | Ev5Magpies wrote: | What are people's thoughts on Tim Allan (No. 57 I think)?
Only playing as a top up player, but he is a good size & athletic.
Potential rookie list spot 2014? |
Would be looking at Ferguson, Hellier, and Wallace before him. All midgets though. |
Wallace had a cracking game, and Hellier can play too.
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
