| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
watt price tully 
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| swoop42 wrote: | | I'd prefer to spend my money on prostitutes. |
I prefer to spend your money on prostitutes too 
_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
 |
stui magpie 
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Bruno wrote: |
Sorry Stui, could you please just re-write your second paragraph? I don't quite understand what you are saying. |
What David said.
Suspending someone pending an investigation doesn't presume guilt,it's neutral but presumes that it would be inappropriate or prejudicial to allow the employee to continue in their job while the investigation is being conducted.
On the other hand, I have personally been involved in terminating employment while criminal charges are being investigated, based on the results of an internal investigation. Never based on allegations only.
And Swoop42, is it your shout at Gotham City? 
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
Bruno
Joined: 19 Sep 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| stui magpie wrote: | | Bruno wrote: |
Sorry Stui, could you please just re-write your second paragraph? I don't quite understand what you are saying. |
What David said.
Suspending someone pending an investigation doesn't presume guilt,it's neutral but presumes that it would be inappropriate or prejudicial to allow the employee to continue in their job while the investigation is being conducted.
On the other hand, I have personally been involved in terminating employment while criminal charges are being investigated, based on the results of an internal investigation. Never based on allegations only.
And Swoop42, is it your shout at Gotham City? |
Hi Stui, I think common sense needs to prevail. If they were just basless allegations you would have more of a point (although I would still disagree), however Thomson has been charged with I think 150 offences.
Also to David ... you presented his time as a union official as if it was some sort of former life. I don't think this is really the case. No doubt it was his time in the union movement which directly led to his pre-selection by Labor. So his conduct as a union official is very relevent to him being in Parliament. I doubt he would have won the seat had he contested it as an Independent.
I just don't want MP standards to drop further because expectations bar is set too low. Confidence in our MP's is low enough as it is. What happens if Gillards in-action on this one sets a new even lower standard going forward?
Either way, thank you both for being willing to debate rather then just insult.
Cheers. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw 
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I'm not sure how you could possibly think that the fact there are charges in respect of "150 offences" could somehow remove the possibility that these are "baseless allegations". I can think of one matter from the year before last (not a party-political issue) where there were about 250 charges which had been on foot for a couple of years and which were, nevertheless, all dropped by the police shortly before trial.
And no, Bruno, I'm not defending this bloke (about whom - and whose predicament - I could care not one jot) - I am, once again, just taking specific issue with the lack of logic underlying your proposition.
But then, of course, you're the lawyer, so I guess you'd know much more about the legal process than I do. |
|
|
|
|
stui magpie
Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.
Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Bruno wrote: |
Hi Stui, I think common sense needs to prevail. If they were just basless allegations you would have more of a point (although I would still disagree), however Thomson has been charged with I think 150 offences.
|
The number of charges is irrelevant, whether they're baseless or not will only be determined later.
I personally have a very low opinion of this individual, but that also is irrelevant.
The process needs to be:
1. He's been charged by the Police with what would constitute serious misconduct if proven.
2. Are we able to conduct our own investigation to determine guilt or innocence? If yes, do so, if no wait for the outcome of police investigation /court proceedings
3. While the investigation / court proceedings are being conducted would it be prejudicial to the investigation or otherwise inappropriate for the person to continue in their current role? If no, leave them there, if yes either suspend on pay or move to a different role.
It's a simple process, you can't assume allegations are baseless or not based on the volume.
_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down. |
|
|
|
|
What'sinaname 
Joined: 29 May 2010
Location: Living rent free
|
| Post subject: | |
|
haw haw
_________________
Fighting against the objectification of woman. |
|
|
|
|
CP
Joined: 05 Feb 2003
Location: Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Bruno wrote: | | nomadjack wrote: | | nomadjack wrote: | | Bruno wrote: | | What I do know is the VPT Left have been vociferous defenders of him. |
Put up or shut up dickhead. Where's the posts supporting him? |
Still nothing? What a surprise   |
Nope. Still not good enough. I have said I don't need to trawl through past threads. The fact nobody in this current thread has had a bad word to say is enough.
I wonder if you would show alleged pedophile priests the same benefit of the doubt. I mean, taking Labor's argument, surely the Catholic Church was right to leave Priests where they were given accused Priests had not yet been tried let alone found guilty in a court of law. Surely, as David argues, until the long slow drawn out legal process takes it's course Priests indeed should have been allowed to remain in charge of and alone with children. |
Game. Set. Match. Tournament. Grand Slam. Throw whatever else in.
Sept 15 can't come soon enough.
Smash the ALP. Smash the Greens. Get adults back in charge. |
|
|
|
|
Member 7167
"What Good Fortune For Governments That The People Do Not Think" - Adolf Hitler.
Joined: 18 Dec 2008
Location: The Collibran Hideout
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| CP wrote: | | Bruno wrote: | | nomadjack wrote: | | nomadjack wrote: | | Bruno wrote: | | What I do know is the VPT Left have been vociferous defenders of him. |
Put up or shut up dickhead. Where's the posts supporting him? |
Still nothing? What a surprise |
Nope. Still not good enough. I have said I don't need to trawl through past threads. The fact nobody in this current thread has had a bad word to say is enough.
I wonder if you would show alleged pedophile priests the same benefit of the doubt. I mean, taking Labor's argument, surely the Catholic Church was right to leave Priests where they were given accused Priests had not yet been tried let alone found guilty in a court of law. Surely, as David argues, until the long slow drawn out legal process takes it's course Priests indeed should have been allowed to remain in charge of and alone with children. |
Game. Set. Match. Tournament. Grand Slam. Throw whatever else in.
Sept 15 can't come soon enough.
Smash the ALP. Smash the Greens. Get adults back in charge. |
It cannot come soon enough.
_________________
Now Retired - Every Day Is A Saturday |
|
|
|
|
Culprit 
Joined: 06 Feb 2003
Location: Port Melbourne
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Once the election passes and his vote is not needed you will not hear about him. Same goes for Peter Slipper. |
|
|
|
|
Pies4shaw
pies4shaw
Joined: 08 Oct 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Say, where is Bruno, anyway? Not that I'm pining or anything. |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| In any case, where is Bruno |
|
|
|
|
Tannin 
Can't remember
Joined: 06 Aug 2006
Location: Huon Valley Tasmania
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Yes, a much improved atmosphere and standard of discussion here of late. It's been great.
_________________
�Let's eat Grandma.� Commas save lives! |
|
|
|
|
watt price tully
Joined: 15 May 2007
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| CP wrote: | | Bruno wrote: | | nomadjack wrote: | | nomadjack wrote: | | Bruno wrote: | | What I do know is the VPT Left have been vociferous defenders of him. |
Put up or shut up dickhead. Where's the posts supporting him? |
Still nothing? What a surprise |
Nope. Still not good enough. I have said I don't need to trawl through past threads. The fact nobody in this current thread has had a bad word to say is enough.
I wonder if you would show alleged pedophile priests the same benefit of the doubt. I mean, taking Labor's argument, surely the Catholic Church was right to leave Priests where they were given accused Priests had not yet been tried let alone found guilty in a court of law. Surely, as David argues, until the long slow drawn out legal process takes it's course Priests indeed should have been allowed to remain in charge of and alone with children. |
Game. Set. Match. Tournament. Grand Slam. Throw whatever else in.
Sept 15 can't come soon enough.
Smash the ALP. Smash the Greens. Get adults back in charge. |
Everyone is entitled to mindless chants. But get your threads right. Try the great big election thread.
What is it about the extreme right wing & the absence of clear thinking? 
_________________
“I even went as far as becoming a Southern Baptist until I realised they didn’t keep ‘em under long enough” Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Difficile dire, watt price tully. |
|
|
|
|
3.14159 
Joined: 12 Sep 2009
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Pies4shaw wrote: |
where is Bruno, anyway?
|
Last edited by 3.14159 on Mon May 20, 2013 10:39 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
