| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Stupied
Joined: 14 Mar 2013
|
| Post subject: |  |
|
| ^I reckon clubs would take the punt if it didn't cost them any players/draft picks. |
|
|
|
 |
uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR
Joined: 01 Nov 2004
Location: Under negotiation
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| ^ I doubt it. |
|
|
|
|
ANNODAM 
Rebel Heart Tour - The Forum, Los Angeles 27/10/2015.
Joined: 02 Jul 2007
Location: Eltham, VIC.
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I doubt it as well.
I did hear Crameri to the WB though, how true that is, I don't know...
But imagine we get say Bellchambers on a 2 year contract & then he cops a 2 year ban, what then?
Are we still obliged to keep paying him or what?
_________________
WE WERE ROBBED, RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME, RIGHT IN FRONT OF MEEE!
N.Y METS, N.Y GIANTS, PENRITH PANTHERS & HOBART HURRICANES FAN.
WE ALL LOOK GOOD AT TRAINING, IT'S THE MATCHES THAT COUNT! |
|
|
|
|
uuuuu..... The LoneSTAR
Joined: 01 Nov 2004
Location: Under negotiation
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| ^ We are obliged to sack the person responsible. |
|
|
|
|
Piethagoras' Theorem 
the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk
Joined: 29 May 2006
|
| Post subject: | |
|
Surely the afl must come out and protect clubs by offering some sort of immunity to clubs picking up a potential asada sanctioned player. A compensation pick or something. Essendon should also be penalised retrospectively if they were to gain from a trade where they pick up a clean player for someone who is eventually sanctioned. Anything short of that would be grossly unjust.
_________________
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood. |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| I can't think of anything. You think of something. |
|
|
|
|
Member 7167 
"What Good Fortune For Governments That The People Do Not Think" - Adolf Hitler.
Joined: 18 Dec 2008
Location: The Collibran Hideout
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote: | | Surely the afl must come out and protect clubs by offering some sort of immunity to clubs picking up a potential asada sanctioned player. A compensation pick or something. Essendon should also be penalised retrospectively if they were to gain from a trade where they pick up a clean player for someone who is eventually sanctioned. Anything short of that would be grossly unjust. |
ASADA need to fast track the remainer of this process and any charges to be made should be done withing the next 3 months so that we can all move on.
How damn long do they want.
Pull their finger out or pizz off imo.
_________________
Now Retired - Every Day Is A Saturday |
|
|
|
|
Piethagoras' Theorem
the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk
Joined: 29 May 2006
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Member 7167 wrote: | | FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote: | | Surely the afl must come out and protect clubs by offering some sort of immunity to clubs picking up a potential asada sanctioned player. A compensation pick or something. Essendon should also be penalised retrospectively if they were to gain from a trade where they pick up a clean player for someone who is eventually sanctioned. Anything short of that would be grossly unjust. |
ASADA need to fast track the remainer of this process and any charges to be made should be done withing the next 3 months so that we can all move on.
How damn long do they want.
Pull their finger out or pizz off imo. |
That would be the ideal scenario. Hard to see it happening though. If nailing players with enough evidence means taking a little extra time, I'm all for it. I have no idea how their process works or at what stage they're at.
_________________
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood. |
|
|
|
|
Piethagoras' Theorem
the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk
Joined: 29 May 2006
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| HAL wrote: | | I can't think of anything. You think of something. |
hmm, something about moving metal parts and salt water dips 
_________________
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood. |
|
|
|
|
Warbler
Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Location: Tyaak Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I'm confused - is the Essendrugs fiasco finished ?
- how can the players not be penalised ?
The AFL have made an absolute dogs breakfast of this & heads should roll .
Has Hird only been pinged for bringing the game into disrepute & not as the mastermind of wholesale doping ?
It has dragged on for so long & I've been in Asia for the last 4 months - so I may have missed something , but the NRL have shown the AFL how to deal with situations like this .
Go Pies |
|
|
|
|
Warbler
Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Location: Tyaak Vic
|
| Post subject: | |
|
I'm confused - is the Essendrugs fiasco finished ?
- how can the players not be penalised ?
The AFL have made an absolute dogs breakfast of this & heads should roll .
Has Hird only been pinged for bringing the game into disrepute & not as the mastermind of wholesale doping ?
It has dragged on for so long & I've been in Asia for the last 4 months - so I may have missed something , but the NRL have shown the AFL how to deal with situations like this .
Go Pies |
|
|
|
|
Stupied
Joined: 14 Mar 2013
|
| Post subject: | |
|
^Infraction notices may still be issued, but that will depend on the outcome of the ongoing ASADA investigation.
The Essendrugs fiasco is finished on the administrative level, but there is a fair way to go until players are dealt with from the looks of it. |
|
|
|
|
MOTR
Joined: 25 Apr 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Warbler wrote: | I'm confused - is the Essendrugs fiasco finished ?
- how can the players not be penalised ?
The AFL have made an absolute dogs breakfast of this & heads should roll .
Has Hird only been pinged for bringing the game into disrepute & not as the mastermind of wholesale doping ?
It has dragged on for so long & I've been in Asia for the last 4 months - so I may have missed something , but the NRL have shown the AFL how to deal with situations like this .
Go Pies |
I can't see how players wont be banned. Their captain has openly admitted he took an S0 category substance. That's a two year ban, unless of course he has provided assistance to ASADA. 6 months is the best he can expect. There is nothing the AFL can do to speed this up.
Hird will never coach again once the consequences of his stupidity become clear. I've also little time for Watson. As the captain he should have done more to protect his players.
_________________
Be Staunch, Be Proud, Be Collingwood |
|
|
|
|
jack_spain 
Joined: 03 May 2008
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| Member 7167 wrote: | | FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote: | | Surely the afl must come out and protect clubs by offering some sort of immunity to clubs picking up a potential asada sanctioned player. A compensation pick or something. Essendon should also be penalised retrospectively if they were to gain from a trade where they pick up a clean player for someone who is eventually sanctioned. Anything short of that would be grossly unjust. |
ASADA need to fast track the remainer of this process and any charges to be made should be done withing the next 3 months so that we can all move on.
How damn long do they want.
Pull their finger out or pizz off imo. |
They are public servants. What do you expect?
Tony Abbott will put a bomb under them. They will have to prove their performance levels or get turfed. As it should be.  |
|
|
|
|
MOTR
Joined: 25 Apr 2003
|
| Post subject: | |
|
| jack_spain wrote: | | Member 7167 wrote: | | FrankieGoesToCollingwood wrote: | | Surely the afl must come out and protect clubs by offering some sort of immunity to clubs picking up a potential asada sanctioned player. A compensation pick or something. Essendon should also be penalised retrospectively if they were to gain from a trade where they pick up a clean player for someone who is eventually sanctioned. Anything short of that would be grossly unjust. |
ASADA need to fast track the remainer of this process and any charges to be made should be done withing the next 3 months so that we can all move on.
How damn long do they want.
Pull their finger out or pizz off imo. |
They are public servants. What do you expect?
Tony Abbott will put a bomb under them. They will have to prove their performance levels or get turfed. As it should be. |
There is a thing called due process, jack, which should never be sacrificed.
_________________
Be Staunch, Be Proud, Be Collingwood |
|
|
|
|
|
The Rules
FAQ
Usergroups
Calendar
Search
Log in
Register
