Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Work(NO)choices.....Fairness test not up to old standard.

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern
 
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
member34258 



Joined: 05 Nov 2006


PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 12:56 am
Post subject: Work(NO)choices.....Fairness test not up to old standard.Reply with quote

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=272092

Quote:
It (fairness test) doesn't apply to all agreements.

"It doesn't apply to all conditions."

Ms Burrow said the test would not address paid maternity leave and excludes 2.5 million workers employed under state awards.


Quote:
It (fairness test) has no review and of course, as we have already pointed out, that it's just a very bad joke to suggest that to get any kind of review working people would have to go to the High Court.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
stui magpie Gemini

Prepare for the worst, hope for the best.


Joined: 03 May 2005
Location: In flagrante delicto

PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:42 pm
Post subject: Re: Work(NO)choices.....Fairness test not up to old standardReply with quote

member34258 wrote:
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=272092

Quote:
It (fairness test) doesn't apply to all agreements.

"It doesn't apply to all conditions."

Ms Burrow said the test would not address paid maternity leave and excludes 2.5 million workers employed under state awards.


Quote:
It (fairness test) has no review and of course, as we have already pointed out, that it's just a very bad joke to suggest that to get any kind of review working people would have to go to the High Court.


LOL. Laughing Do you actually know anything about the legislation or just post articles that agree with your point of view?

The previous no disadvantage test didn't address Mat leave or anything else specifically.

The previous no disadvantage test was a holistic test, not a line by line examination, that said if the overall terms and conditions of an AWA were less than the overall T's and C's provided by the Award, then it wouldn't be accepted by the OEA. There were no protected conditions such as overtime (which there is now).

The only part I'll agree with is that if their is no one applying the no disadvantage test other than the high court, then that's an issue but I'll check that and get back to you. Wink

_________________
Every dead body on Mt Everest was once a highly motivated person, so maybe just calm the **** down.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Page 1 of 1   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group