Collingwood vrs Richmond match-ups

BUCKS · Joined: 06 Sep 2001 Location: VICTORIA

SNR

F: Rogers-----Richardson----Tivendale
B: LOCKYER---PRESTIGIACOMO---CLEMENT

HF: Pettifer---A.Kellaway----Hilton
HB: BURNS-------WAKELIN-----FREEBORN

C: Chaffey------Knights------Bowden
C: LICURIA------O'BREE-----STEINFORT

HB: Cameron-----Holland------Torney
HF: RINTOUL------ROCCA-------N.DAVIS

B: Sziller--------Hall--------Gaspar
F: L.DAVIS------CUMMINGS-----TARRANT

FL: Ottens-------Campbell-----C.King
FL: RICHARDSON---BUCKLEY------HOLLAND

IN: Krakouer Fiora Poyas Vardy
IN: McKEE DIDAK ADKINS FRASER

What do you think?

[This message has been edited by BUCKS (edited 19 March 2002).]

[This message has been edited by BUCKS (edited 19 March 2002).]

MAGPIRA · Joined: 08 May 2001

Will Gaspar be back by round 1? I thought he was out for 6? Oh well...better to beat them with a full side so as they have no excuses

bwphantom · Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2002 2:31 pm

Wakelin worries me at CHB. I would like to see Rocca play back there( I know I will get assed kicked for suggesting this). Play Tarrant CHF and let him roam. Wakelin on Tivendale and allow Clement to run free on the HFF or HBF. I would like to see Cummin's being given some room and I just see Tarrant and Cummin's fighting for room to move.

GO PIES

Presti35 · Posted: Wed Mar 20, 2002 6:38 pm

Watch out Mathew Richadson!!
Because Your Candy-A$$ is Next!!
If you smell what Presti's cookin!!

Who loves ya Presti?
WE DO!

Brown26 · Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2002 7:20 am

If Fraser's fit he will not be on the bench.

Richo will be at CHB at least to start with, perhaps swap obree and holland, cloke doesn't get a run on HBF?

(I know richo at CHB mean, oh no, Stunner will be in ruck! - even Dr Alf will be able to count those hit outs!)

Pies for Premiers 2002, 3, 4, 5, 6....

BUCKS · Joined: 06 Sep 2001 Location: VICTORIA

On the match ups that some of you have been talking about I'll give you a few of my reasons why I placed them in such positions.

Josh Fraser - He might make it across the line to play Richmond..but he aint going to be fit enough to play a whole game. Thats why I put him on the bench, I think the most he will be able to contribute that night will be as a burst forward coming off the bench. So lets hope we get a goal or two out of him.

Shane Wakelin - I dont know why you question my move on playing Shane Centre half back. For in the preason he has been great in holding his own down there. And has been in the best a few times aswell. I'm more than confident he will continue to play well in that position if left there.

Mark Richardson - Some of you say, "To play Mark at Centre Half Back." But I purposley placed him in the ruck to pretty much follow Ottens around the ground as a tagging big man. And if Ottens does move to Centre Half Forward it wont be out of Mark Richardson's depth to a least compete with him. He has done this role before. And if Mark does tire from this role Steve McKee will have to cover.

[This message has been edited by BUCKS (edited 20 March 2002).]

WhyPhilWhy? · Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2002 8:56 am

What chance Wakelin following Ottens where ever he goes?

Didn't I read somewhere that MM tried Wakes in the ruck on Saturday? Perhaps that's what he's thinking.

Any year we beat Carlton is a good year

BUCKS · Joined: 06 Sep 2001 Location: VICTORIA

I dont think Wakelin will do that well in following Brad Ottens around the ground. Due to the fact that Ottens is more a ruckman than a Centre Half Forward. He only plays in the forward line because he is that good a player, to be able to exploit small defences.

Wakelin is your good average key backman. Mark Richardson on the other hand has had experience in ruck duals, so therefore would at least give Ottens a contest when in ruck and around the ground. And if Ottens drops forward Mark Richardson still would be able to at least handle him.

Shane Wakelin should be left to handle the more genuine Centre half forwards like Grant, Lucas and Holland. Mark Richardson should handle the forward Ruckmen like Ottens and Everitt.

DaicosForever · Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2002 3:13 pm

Bucks 5. I am thinking your side is pretty much on the mark I only question the inclusion of Adkins and Didak both played for Willy in the two's on the weekend rather then the firsts.Given their potential height in the forward line I tend to think Mark Richo might make an appearance and I'am with Brown26 in thinking Clokey might get rewarded for a fine preseason possibly being one of our best in an ordinary pre season overall. Mickey loves blooding youth in these types of games and hell a young cloke debuting against the tigers...I see some irony in that!!!!

If you do get a start Good luck to ya Clokey!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Show Bitchmond exactly what they missed out on!!!!!!!!!!

Louis

mark stokes · Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2002 4:20 pm

BUCKS YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN ABOUT GREG STAFFORD PLAYING FOR RICHMOND
SO THE MATCH UPS MAY CHANGE
F.F RICHARDSON-PRESTI
H.F. OTTENS-RICHO
RUCK STAFFORD-FRASER/MCKEE
COLL FOWARD SETUP
H.F. ROCCA-HOLLAND
TARRANT-GASPAR
CUMMINGS-KELLAWAY
IF ONE OF THE COLLINGWOOD TALLS GETS THE LESSER DEFENDER
THEY COULD HAVE A GOOD NIGHT.MOLLOY WOULD HAVE STRETCHED THE TIGERS DEFENCE

couldabeen

cobood · Posted: Thu Mar 21, 2002 5:43 pm

Hey Mark,

Please dont shout..... we're not blind

BE LOUD...BE PROUD
(September.... we WILL be there)

BUCKS · Joined: 06 Sep 2001 Location: VICTORIA

You maybe right DaicosForever on playing Jason Cloke instead of Damien Adkins. He would help in the tall department. And knowing the way Jason plays he would fire up for the occasion, seeing its Richmond we are playing (One of his dads old clubs).

Bring on Jason Cloke!
Have red hot go son!

On the Stafford comment...I thought he was injuried?
Thats why he is not in my lineup.