View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
By the way, do you mind if I ask you a personal question? |
|
|
|
|
Dragme
Screaming.
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
|
Post subject: | |
|
3: Swan
2: Thomas
1: Tooves _________________ Born, Live and Die a Magpie |
|
|
|
|
luvlicca
Oh Nicky your so fine, your so fine you blow my mind!!!!!!
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Location: Rockingham
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Tarkyn Lockyer
2. Dane Swan
1. Paul Licuria _________________ - Thanks for the memories Licca - I'm gonna miss you!!! - Bring on 2008 - Nick Maxwell has my vote for Captain - |
|
|
|
|
Magpie Since 1986
Traitor
Joined: 03 Aug 2002 Location: Collingwood
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. S Burns
2. A Rocca
1. T Lockyer |
|
|
|
|
Piethagoras' Theorem
the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk
Joined: 29 May 2006
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Lockyer (outstanding 4 qtr effort)
2. Burns (driving force out of the middle)
1. Thomas (explosive, relentless, creative) _________________ Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood. |
|
|
|
|
Presti35
Dick Lee for Legend Status
Joined: 05 Oct 2001 Location: London, England
|
Post subject: | |
|
Neil Appleby wrote: | You are referring to the people giving Leon votes right?
Incomprehensible, bewildering and very bothering! |
Sure he didnt get 40 possesions but a couple of good goals, good marks, good tackles and most important... 1%ers I just think he had a great night and deserved a vote. (also he kicked that ripper right infront of me which could have helped ). _________________ A Goal Saved Is 2 Goals Earned! |
|
|
|
|
cloggie
Joined: 23 Mar 2004 Location: Camberwell, Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
3 Votes: Lockyer
2 Votes: Swan
1 Vote: R Shaw _________________ I get up an hour early just so I can hate Carlscum an hour longer |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
Just three? |
|
|
|
|
prowdy12
Joined: 15 Oct 2004 Location: darwin
|
Post subject: votes | |
|
great second half from Rocca but my votes go to
3 Lockyer
2 Swan
1 D Thomas
S burns was Awesome and could easy be the 3 votes but i just love the spark of Thomas. Lockyer was great and swan with 36 toches i think was very good _________________ from the top |
|
|
|
|
DaVe86
Man of Steele
Joined: 08 Oct 2004 Location: Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Swan
2. Rocca
1. Burns
Rocca was by far the most influential, Swan with his leather poisoning was the bog, and burns setup so many goals and layed that many tackles it was not funny.
Thomas, O'bree, Lockyer etc were all great but did not have the same sort of influence as these guys _________________ There's more to life than footy.........just not much more. |
|
|
|
|
Snoop Dog
Joined: 04 Oct 2004
|
Post subject: | |
|
3 Lockyer
2 Burns
1 Swan _________________ 'You da man' |
|
|
|
|
Neil Appleby
Joined: 11 Feb 1998 Location: Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
HAL I hope you are toting these up.
BTW, do we get a round by round total? |
|
|
|
|
HAL
Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.
Joined: 17 Mar 2003
|
Post subject: | |
|
OK. I'm sorry, Neil Appleby, I don't have enough information. What is it to you? |
|
|
|
|
Babylove
Joined: 15 Oct 2003 Location: Victoria
|
Post subject: | |
|
3. Swan
2. Lockyer
1. Pendlebury |
|
|
|
|
DaVe86
Man of Steele
Joined: 08 Oct 2004 Location: Melbourne
|
Post subject: | |
|
struggling to see how Rocca is not regularly getting into these votes. Thought he was by far the most influential player on the ground. Swan to me was clear bog...but rocca was the guy that got the ball turning.
If Rocca wasnt there, we would not have won. If Rocca had a poor 2nd half, Swan wouldve still got 36 touches, and we wouldve lost. It was Rocca's 2nd half which won us the game. Surely he should be featuring for atleast the 1 vote. This isnt a stats contest. _________________ There's more to life than footy.........just not much more. |
|
|
|
|
|