Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index
 The RulesThe Rules FAQFAQ
   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch 
Log inLog in RegisterRegister
 
Literally

Users browsing this topic:0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 0 Guests
Registered Users: None

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern
 
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 4:48 pm
Post subject: LiterallyReply with quote

I don't know who else has noticed this word being used in entirely the wrong context. The worst thing is, the main offenders are newspaper writers, who should really know better Razz

The annoying thing is I've seen it misused on many occasions in the Herald Sun and at the moment can't think of one quote that backs this up. So I'll just link to a webpage I found that has some good examples (from elsewhere):
http://literally.barelyfitz.com/
By the way, I can't believe someone devoted an entire blog to it Razz

For those who don't know, literally means it is actually the case, usually when referring to metaphors. So if you say a football player is literally a star, you are saying he is a big ball of gas in outer space.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Pa Marmo 

Side by Side


Joined: 16 Jun 2003
Location: Nicks BB member #617

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 5:49 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David you will also see them using "an" before a "h" that isn’t silent. Seeing they can’t be truthfully correct they should be at least grammatically correct.
_________________
Genesis 1:1
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Piethagoras' Theorem Taurus

the hypotenuse, is always a cakewalk


Joined: 29 May 2006


PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 5:53 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, very annoying DFC. Twisted Evil I also find these 'americanisms' creeping into our language very annoying such as stop it 'already' or the word 'period' being used to describe an ending or full stop.

A little off topic here but annoying nonetheless and the one that bugs me most with the Yanks (fortunately not used here) is the use of 'I am too' or 'you are too' instead of 'I am so' or 'you are so' Twisted Evil

_________________
Formally frankiboy and FrankieGoesToCollingwood.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Robert Walls (not really) 



Joined: 26 Jun 2006


PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:27 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

how about "like"

"like, you know, like"
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Banned 
Cathalyst 



Joined: 22 Jul 2006


PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 pm
Post subject: Re: LiterallyReply with quote

David from Canberra wrote:


For those who don't know, literally means it is actually the case, usually when referring to metaphors. So if you say a football player is literally a star, you are saying he is a big ball of gas in outer space.

Wrong! Star has more than one meaning and therefore is a seperate word to a sun, so your example is quite "literally".... flawed
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Banned 
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:10 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

There is only one sun Cathalyst. True, the word star has almost come to mean something different, but if you say someone is "literally a star" then you could only really mean one thing. The funny thing is I don't even know if anyone has ever used that expression Confused
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Cathalyst 



Joined: 22 Jul 2006


PostPosted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:35 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

David from Canberra wrote:
There is only one sun Cathalyst. True, the word star has almost come to mean something different, but if you say someone is "literally a star" then you could only really mean one thing. The funny thing is I don't even know if anyone has ever used that expression Confused
There's no "almost" about it, star has several meanings ansd therefore is several different words

And there are many suns, just not in this little backwater solar system
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Banned 
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:04 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I was under the impression that the Sun is only our Sun because it is the star around which OUR solar system revolves. Every other star, is a star.

By the way I think it's silly for people to refer to our solar system as a "backwater" or use terms like that. From the way we look at it, it's the most important solar system in the universe, obviously, just as Earth is the most important planet in the solar system, to us.

As for star having different meanings, the reason I said it only means one thing is because star in the sense of a sports player derives from the word star, and is used in a metaphorical sense. A word that truly has several meanings is "like", which can be a synonym for "to enjoy" or "similar to"

Sorry if I'm starting to sound like a wank*r Razz but this stuff interests me for some reason.

_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Cathalyst 



Joined: 22 Jul 2006


PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:13 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

Wrong again, stars are suns, has nothing to do with just being ours.
And backwater is a very accurate representation of where we are in the galaxy, hidden away in a very insignificant corner of it in relation to the giant black hole at the centre of it, thats the view of astronomers, not mine
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Banned 
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:29 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. Astronomers would say that because they're looking at it in context of everything in the universe. All I'm saying is, from our point of view (our = every human being who has ever lived) it is the most important solar system there is Razz so unless we can go and trade it for a bigger better solar system we should be happy with what we've got Wink
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
Cathalyst 



Joined: 22 Jul 2006


PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:50 am
Post subject: Reply with quote

David from Canberra wrote:
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. Astronomers would say that because they're looking at it in context of everything in the universe. All I'm saying is, from our point of view (our = every human being who has ever lived) it is the most important solar system there is Razz so unless we can go and trade it for a bigger better solar system we should be happy with what we've got Wink

Astronomically we are in a particularly uninteresting part of the galaxy, thats an objective fact, you are speaking about a subjective emotional call, the christians used to think the earth was the centre of the universe, but it didn't make it true
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Banned 
pica 



Joined: 09 Aug 2004


PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 11:22 am
Post subject: Re: LiterallyReply with quote

Cathalyst wrote:
Wrong! Star has more than one meaning and therefore is a seperate word to a sun, so your example is quite "literally".... flawed


Just like your spelling is flawed. It's "separate"
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message  
Cathalyst 



Joined: 22 Jul 2006


PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 3:58 pm
Post subject: Re: LiterallyReply with quote

pica wrote:


Just like your spelling is flawed. It's "separate"

No, your presumption is flawed, it was a typo, thats what ya get for being a nit pica Smile
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Banned 
David Libra

I dare you to try


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Location: Andromeda

PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 4:34 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

To be honest I can never get seperate/separate right. But the word that bugs me the most is necessary. Seriously that one is a nightmare. I automatically spell it nesseccary and have to correct myself each time. I think if you look through some of my older posts you'll also see "critiscism" appear a fair bit. The first S shouldn't be there Razz
_________________
All watched over by machines of loving grace
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger  
HAL 

Please don't shout at me - I can't help it.


Joined: 17 Mar 2003


PostPosted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 4:36 pm
Post subject: Reply with quote

You are a good speller.
Back to top  
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Nick's Collingwood Bulletin Board Forum Index -> Victoria Park Tavern All times are GMT + 11 Hours

Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3   

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Privacy Policy

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group