is williams still on our list?

madman · Joined: 29 Sep 2004 Location: melbourne

i would like to think there is no way in hell we would keep williams, if people think he might be like a nick davis type he would have had to have done it this year, i think he only managed 5 games at most (this year).

Johnson#26 · Joined: 18 Dec 2003

I wouldn't mind Cranage, but he has been at two AFL clubs before (ST.K 1998-1999) and Carlton (2000-2002). I don't think we should try, but we saw what happened to Josh Mahoney so you never know...

rand corp · Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Location: south east asia

Actually I think that Mullins showed more in his brief senior appearences this year than Nixon and Shack combined.

He did run out of puff by the end of the year and fitness is a big issue however, I would think it was not Goog who we told was not required and might have been one of the other two, most probably Shack.

Cam · Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2004 2:21 pm

Agree about Mullins. Definitely more everything and less turnovers. Lack of body size could be a problem, albeit a fixable one.

d9 tank · Joined: 04 Oct 2002 Location: Victoria

Problem with Mullins is even Shacks makes him look slow and Davis looks like a good defender next to him.

Worst defensive game and slowest run I've just about ever seen.

Skills and game reading just aren't good enough to compensate for his deficiencies.

Bye Bye.

Johnson#26 · Joined: 18 Dec 2003

I like the looks of Mullins but it appears MM doesn't. Reminds me of Scooter - which may be his downfall with MM. I'd like to keep him, but he is expendable.

Rob8 · Joined: 15 Oct 2003

Mullins reminds you of Scooter!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Except for the fact Scooter was a gun from day 1 and actually got the ball.

Mullins is one paced and seems to look genuinely disinterested when he's out on the field re: v. Fremantle at TD

Johnson#26 · Joined: 18 Dec 2003

Mullins and Scooter are classy and skilled. Both get the ball. I'd still keep Mullo if we get the chance.