TARRANT FOR JUDD What does everyone think?

GO RUPERT 10 · Joined: 27 Apr 2001 Location: THOMASTOWN,VIC,AUSTRALIA

ive been having this argument with my boss at work
would you swap chris tarrant for chris judd?
just what an opinion

Magpie Since 1986 · Traitor Joined: 03 Aug 2002 Location: Collingwood

No. Only because good key position players are harder to get than midfielders. If it happened though I wouldnt be too upset.

Pa Marmo · Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 6:18 pm

NOT IN A HEARTBEAT

Sultan of spin · Joined: 31 Aug 2003 Location: Burnley

No, Tarrant is our most important player

GreekLunatic · Joined: 22 Feb 2003 Location: doncaster vic australia

tarrant will stay a pie for sure but i read in the sun we could get rid of 12 players isnt that over doing it a little

Cam · Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 8:52 pm

No. If you can cope without Buckley you can cope without Judd. Mighty hard to cope without Taz.

foxychick · jay Joined: 18 May 2004 Location: Melbourne

I know I may get condemed for saying this but I would take Judd! i just find that Tarrant is inconsistent...I just dislike his attitude..if he had the heart to play football then i wouldn't give him up but it sometimes feels as if he doesn't wear his heart on his sleeve!! and his kick isn't the best either but the positive side is that he does provide an option and is a great mark.

but there is no use on having forwards if there is no midfield to bring the ball there! We have a lot of tall forwards coming through..i think finding a place for them all is going to be hard! BUt i know it's harder to find key position players than midfielders..but finding a classy midfielder who can break open a game is a different story.

Dale61 · Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:17 pm

Not another Tarrant for Judd thread. This is #1483 in the series.

Cam · Posted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 11:19 pm

Our midfield got smashed last year, and kicked shit for Taz to try and mark. Remember 2003 when Taz kick 50+ goals and took the most marks in the AFL?

BBHS · bbhs Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Location: Bellarine

sourav04 · Joined: 11 May 2004 Location: Perth

No. No No NO Absolutely not. I am not sure I can emphasize it enought Noooooooooooooo. I agree with what someone else posted on this topic. We have won games without Buckly, we have not won many games without Tarrant or Rocca. Both are Untoucahble. Judd playes for West Coast, and the reason why they are and will be continous finals losers is they have no forward line. 5 Judds will not help them.

sourav04 · Joined: 11 May 2004 Location: Perth

Just in case there is any doubt to my previous post. NO. I feel very strongly about this NO.

Johnson#26 · Joined: 18 Dec 2003

No way. Keep Taz.

Brown26 · Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:55 pm

another for no - Taz is a gun, he's the best player of his type going round, bloody hard to match up on, works hard on the ground, marks well, leads well, still got a lot of years in him. We cna get another midfileder who is almost as good as Judd, we can't get another Tarrant, cause there isn't one.

- Ben

The Prototype · Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2004 12:16 am

No, as much as I would like Judd at Collingwood, Tarrant is more important.